Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dima Kogan
* Package name: libpdl-linearalgebra-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Grégory Vanuxem
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~ellipse/PDL-LinearAlgebra-0.06/LinearAlgebra.pm
* License : Artistic
Programming L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dima Kogan
* Package name: libconst-fast-perl
Version : 0.013
Upstream Author : Leon Timmermans
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~leont/Const-Fast-0.013/lib/Const/Fast.pm
* License : GPL or Artistic
Programming Lang: Pe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dima Kogan
* Package name: libmath-quaternion-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Jonathan Chin,
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~jchin/Math-Quaternion-0.03/lib/Math/Quaternion.pm
* License : GPL or Artistic
Programm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dima Kogan
* Package name: libfile-tee-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Salvador Fandiño
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~salva/File-Tee-0.07/lib/File/Tee.pm
* License : GPL or Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl
De
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dima Kogan
* Package name: libalgorithm-lbfgs-perl
Version : 0.16
Upstream Author : Laye Suen
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/~laye/Algorithm-LBFGS-0.16/lib/Algorithm/LBFGS.pm
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Perl
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dima Kogan
* Package name: libdogleg
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Dima Kogan
* URL : https://github.com/Oblong/libdogleg
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Powell's dog-leg optimization routin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dima Kogan
* Package name: sglib
Version : 1.0.4
Upstream Author : Martin Vittek
* URL : http://sglib.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL or any OSI-approved license
Programming Lang: C
Description : Header-only conta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ross Glover
* Package name: trac-includemacro
Version : 3.0.0~r12030-1
Upstream Author : Ryan J Ollos
* URL : https://trac-hacks.org/wiki/IncludeMacro
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Includ
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 489 (new: 19)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 136 (new: 2)
Total number of packages reques
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 06:41:24PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Maybe an example will help get us on the same page. Russ seems to
>> have the impression that my proposal is somehow a license to push
>> unwanted changes at a maintainer. Tha
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 06:41:24PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Maybe an example will help get us on the same page. Russ seems to
> have the impression that my proposal is somehow a license to push
> unwanted changes at a maintainer. That is not true.
>
> Let's consider mlocate as a hypotheti
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 04:30:51PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> > You're still making the maintainer take explicit action to stop
>> > something that he already said they didn't want to happen.
>>
>> For a time, this is how regular nmu
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 04:30:51PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > You're still making the maintainer take explicit action to stop
> > something that he already said they didn't want to happen.
>
> For a time, this is how regular nmus were greeted, but as a project,
> we've gotten over that unwa
Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Michael Gilbert writes:
>>> Not if the nmu has a sufficient delay (DELAYED/10 or DELAYED/30 or
>>> whatever would be agreed on). The maintainer can cancel things that
>>> he doesn't like before they get uploaded.
]] Michael Gilbert
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >> > The new upstream release did not include any particularly compelling
> >> > changes for wheezy, which is why I did not update to the newer
> >> > upstream version.
> >>
> >> It may not have include changes interest
Michael Gilbert writes:
> Not if the nmu has a sufficient delay (DELAYED/10 or DELAYED/30 or
> whatever would be agreed on). The maintainer can cancel things that he
> doesn't like before they get uploaded.
You're still making the maintainer take explicit action to stop something
that he alread
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> That's where nmus help. Someone that does care and does have the time
>> can go ahead and get the features interesting them (and likely many
>> other users) to work.
>
> That's only true if you're happy with all of the changes being reverted
Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> «For wheezy» is operative in my statement. hurd is not a wheezy
>> release architecture, and it's actually not even part of Debian any
>> longer any more than HPPA or AVR32 is. Making changes for such
>> archite
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> > The new upstream release did not include any particularly compelling
>> > changes for wheezy, which is why I did not update to the newer
>> > upstream version.
>>
>> It may not have include changes interesting to you, but there was
>> cert
]] Michael Gilbert
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
[...]
> > The new upstream release did not include any particularly compelling
> > changes for wheezy, which is why I did not update to the newer
> > upstream version.
>
> It may not have include changes interesting to
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
>> wine: http://bugs.debian.org/585409 (new upstream pushed via nmu)
>
> This is a good example where talking helped to gather all views on all aspects
> from all involved people. My impression is that finally the maintainer
> allowed
> new co-m
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Michael Gilbert
>
>> mlocate: http://bugs.debian.org/669368 (new upstream could have been
>> pushed via nmu before the freeze, but it was prepared too late)
>>
>
> The suggested NMU that does random changes like changing the packaging
> t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med group
* Package name: python-csb
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Michael Habeck
* URL : http://csb.codeplex.com/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python framework for structural
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Pitt
* Package name: python-dbusmock
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Martin Pitt
* URL : https://launchpad.net/python-dbusmock
* License : LGPL 3+
Programming Lang: Python 3
Description : Mock D-Bus obje
On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 08:48 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:16:56PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:32:40AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > >> How to solve the following problem: Assume
]] Michael Gilbert
> mlocate: http://bugs.debian.org/669368 (new upstream could have been
> pushed via nmu before the freeze, but it was prepared too late)
>
The suggested NMU that does random changes like changing the packaging
to 3.0 (quilt) and adding an uploader? Is that even a serious
sug
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:16:56PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:32:40AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> >> How to solve the following problem: Assume a package with wishlist bugs
> >> filed lagging behind upstream
27 matches
Mail list logo
