On Tue, 09 Oct 2012, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Imagine for a minute that we have 2 implementation of the same service.
> Lets say, for this example, MariaDB and MySQL (this is *not* a real world
> example, since last time I checked, we don't have MariaDB in Debian but
> it well could be a real proble
On 10/09/2012 02:15 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The thing is that it really does no harm if a package actually does
this; although it is pretty pointless since those files will be gone
after reboot. So, even though policy says "must not", it's not really
a problem in practice, so important is pr
2012/9/18 Jon Dowland wrote:
>> There's no need to walk through the minefield, it's already done.
>> Fedora lost more than half of the user base with the Fedora 15
>> release (GNOME3 and systemd).
>
> [citation-needed]
Good point.
Initially it was a personal feeling. Many fedora users I know hav
When unbound is installed, the root key is at /var/lib/unbound/root.key.
The init script updates it, if requsted, by way of unbound-anchor(8).
Ideally there would be a separate package each dnssec-aware package
could depend on which would maintain the root.key file.
For comparison, gentoo has a
Hi!
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:02:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 08.10.2012 20:15, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> "Packages must not include files or directories under /run,
> >> or under the older /var/run and /var/lock paths."
> >
> > Th
On 08.10.2012 20:15, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> "Packages must not include files or directories under /run,
>> or under the older /var/run and /var/lock paths."
>
> The thing is that it really does no harm if a package actually does
> this; al
* Michael Gilbert , 2012-10-08, 14:15:
"Packages must not include files or directories under /run, or under
the older /var/run and /var/lock paths."
The thing is that it really does no harm if a package actually does
this
Given that /var/lock is world-writable in Debian, and that dpkg follows
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 01:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> Would it be appropriate to file RC bugs against all the packages
>>> shipping anything in /var/run, /var/lock or /run?
>>>
>> No, there's nothing wrong with that.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Julien
>
> Li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com>
* Package name: sweethome3d-furniture-editor
Version : 1.8
Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret, eTeks
* URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Java
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
> I have a question. Since maintainers of LXDE are extremely busy last
Perhaps you would like to join the LXDE package maintainers team and
help them out? They don't appear to be using the pkg-lxde group on
alioth though, so best con
Andrej N. Gritsenko wrote:
[new LXDE]
>So question is - may it be possible to upload them into experimental
> or I have still to bother maintainers? I feel sorry to do that again.
Hello,
an upload to experimental needs to be signed by a Debian Developer[1],
there is no real difference to upl
Hello!
I have a question. Since maintainers of LXDE are extremely busy last
few months I would like to find a way to upload latest upstream version
of libfm and pcmanfm into experimental repository. I feel sorry that I
constantly bug the maintainers with the same question and I think they
Jakub Wilk writes ("Re: assumptions about the build environment."):
> More questions about build env assumptions:
My answers:
> Can you assume that /sbin and /usr/sbin are within PATH?
No. Package builds are supposed to be done as the user; the rootness
of the "install" target is just for file
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Asias He
* Package name: ibus-libpinyin
Version : 1.4.92
Upstream Author : Peng Huang
BYVoid
Peng Wu
* URL : https://github.com/libpinyin/ibus-libpinyin
* License : GPL2
Progra
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sascha Steinbiss
* Package name: ltrsift
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Sascha Steinbiss
* URL : http://www.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/LTRsift
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : postprocessing and class
I am posting this on -devel because I think that it rather belongs here than
in the context of #681834 and the discussion in -ctte
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:41 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 05 octobre 2012 à 22:07 -0600, Bdale Garbee a écrit :
> > I personally believe that metapac
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dominique Dumont
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libpithub-perl
Version : 0.1016
Upstream Author : Johannes Plunien
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Pithub/
* License
On 08/10/2012 12:33, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 01:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 23:16:05 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I haven't made a detailed analysis, yet, and cannot say how many
>>> packages would be affected. Right now I have about
On 10/08/2012 01:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 23:16:05 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
I haven't made a detailed analysis, yet, and cannot say how many
packages would be affected. Right now I have about 100 candidate
piuparts logs that should cover /var/run and /var/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessandro Ghedini
* Package name: libserver-starter-perl
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Kazuho Oku
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Server-Starter/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Descript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessandro Ghedini
* Package name: libproc-wait3-perl
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Curt Tilmes
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Proc-Wait3/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
21 matches
Mail list logo
