Re: mass bug filing about packages manipulating/deleting shipped files

2012-10-04 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-09-18 13:15, Agustin Martin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> ilithuanian_1.2.1-3 >> /var/lib/ispell/lietuviu.hash >> /var/lib/ispell/lietuviu.compat >> aspell-kk_0.2-1 >> /var/lib/aspell/kk.compat >> /var/lib/aspell/kk.rws > > I guess th

Re: where is the DNSSEC root key?

2012-10-04 Thread Ivan Shmakov
> Philipp Kern writes: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 03:10:01PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Last I looked into this [which has admittedly been a while], Bind 9 >> was the only DNS server that had actually implemented DNSSEC, and >> the others I looked at (PowerDNS, djbdns, tinydns) had s

Work-needing packages report for Oct 5, 2012

2012-10-04 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 470 (new: 1) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 136 (new: 0) Total number of packages request

Re: Out of Date Package and Maintainer Absence

2012-10-04 Thread Vincent W. Chen
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:27:22PM -0700, Vincent W. Chen wrote: >> I am willing to co-maintain the package with Manoj, or even maintain >> it by myself if he's no longer interested in dealing with it. But >> since there has been no reply from

Re: where is the DNSSEC root key?

2012-10-04 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 03:10:01PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > Last I looked into this [which has admittedly been a while], Bind 9 was the > only DNS server that had actually implemented DNSSEC, and the others I looked > at (PowerDNS, djbdns, tinydns) had stated (IIRC) that they were /not/ going

Re: where is the DNSSEC root key?

2012-10-04 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 10/04/2012 09:10 PM, Chris Knadle wrote: > Last I looked into this [which has admittedly been a while], Bind 9 was the > only DNS server that had actually implemented DNSSEC, and the others I looked > at (PowerDNS, djbdns, tinydns) had stated (IIRC) that they were /not/ going > to > be impl

Re: where is the DNSSEC root key?

2012-10-04 Thread Chris Knadle
On Thursday, October 04, 2012 06:42:08, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Hello, > I've started working with DNSSEC and I noticed a quite important > issue. The DNSSEC libraries ask for the root key, but where this file > is located is system specific (meaning no fixed location). Where is > this ke

Bug#689636: ITP: slic3r -- STL-to-GCODE translator for RepRap printers

2012-10-04 Thread Bas Wijnen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Bas Wijnen * Package name: slic3r Version : 0.9.3 Upstream Author : Alessandro Ranellucci * URL : http://slic3r.org/ * License : AGPL-3 Programming Lang: Perl, C++ Description : STL-to-GCODE translator for 3D pri

Re: Out of Date Package and Maintainer Absence

2012-10-04 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 09:54:05AM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > It is very unlikely they would unblock a package with major changes such > as a new upstream version. Not to say Vincent should not work on it, but > it won't be in time for Wheezy. Yes, agreed. There is the small-print reason that the e

Re: symlink vs. directory "conflicts"

2012-10-04 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 01:53:56 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Andreas Beckmann writes: > > So what is the general recommendation about packages that ship files > > over symlinked directories? Should this be forbidden because it opens > > cans of worms? > > Yes. Right. > This sort of thing: > > >

Re: symlink vs. directory "conflicts"

2012-10-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Beckmann writes: > There are also more complicated^Wmessed up cases like sendmail that has > maintainer scripts that try to setup /u/s/doc/sendmail-foo -> sendmail > symlinks while at the same time shipping /u/s/doc/sendmail-foo/README > etc. where several packages are overwriting each ot

Re: [Pkg-dia-team] Bug#689293: dia menu entry should use /usr/bin/dia not /usr/bin/dia-normal

2012-10-04 Thread Andre Naujoks
On 04.10.2012 09:57, schrieb Roland Stigge: > Hi! > > On 10/04/2012 09:07 AM, Andre Naujoks wrote: >>> On 01/10/12 10:30, Andre Naujoks wrote: The installation of dia should add a menu entry to start dia with the link in /usr/bin/dia, so the choice of the alternatives system is taken >>>

Re: symlink vs. directory "conflicts"

2012-10-04 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 03/10/2012 23:24, Andreas Beckmann a écrit : > > So what is the general recommendation about packages that ship > files over symlinked directories? Should this be forbidden because > it opens cans of worms? I don't think that this should be

Re: [Pkg-dia-team] Bug#689293: dia menu entry should use /usr/bin/dia not /usr/bin/dia-normal

2012-10-04 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi! On 10/04/2012 09:07 AM, Andre Naujoks wrote: >> On 01/10/12 10:30, Andre Naujoks wrote: >>> The installation of dia should add a menu entry to start dia with the >>> link in /usr/bin/dia, so the choice of the alternatives system is taken >>> into account. >>> >>> Currently /usr/bin/dia-normal

Re: Out of Date Package and Maintainer Absence

2012-10-04 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 04.10.2012 08:53, Jon Dowland wrote: > As for getting it into wheezy: I don't think odds are particularly high, but > the release team will need to see a newer version of the package in order to > decide whether to grant a freeze exception or not. It is very unlikely they would unblock a p

Re: [Pkg-dia-team] Bug#689293: dia menu entry should use /usr/bin/dia not /usr/bin/dia-normal

2012-10-04 Thread Andre Naujoks
On 03.10.2012 12:38, schrieb Roland Stigge: > Hi! > > Thanks you for your report! > > On 01/10/12 10:30, Andre Naujoks wrote: >> The installation of dia should add a menu entry to start dia with the >> link in /usr/bin/dia, so the choice of the alternatives system is taken >> into account. >> >>

Bug#689572: nmu: packages linked against libhdf5-7 << 1.8.8-7.1

2012-10-04 Thread Ivan Shmakov
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org There're several packages currently in Debian testing having a versioned dependency on the semi-virtual libhdf5-7 p