also sprach Nikolaus Rath [2012.09.30.0056 +0200]:
> > preinst script by 'rm -rf /usr/include/libfm' and I thought yet
> > that was a right step since upgrade 1.0.1 -> 1.0.2 went smooth.
>
> Somehow that sounds like a really bad idea to me. Admittedly
> manually placing some file in /usr/include/
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:29:09 -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> I've solved that in the
> preinst script by 'rm -rf /usr/include/libfm' and I thought yet that was
> a right step since upgrade 1.0.1 -> 1.0.2 went smooth.
> >>>Somehow that sounds like a really bad idea to me. Admittedly ma
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
> Hello!
>
> I have written on Sunday, 30 September, at 2:12:
>>Nikolaus Rath has written on Saturday, 29 September, at 18:56:
>>>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
I've solved that in the
preinst script by 'rm -rf /usr/include/libfm' and I thought yet that
Hello!
I have written on Sunday, 30 September, at 2:12:
>Nikolaus Rath has written on Saturday, 29 September, at 18:56:
>>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
>>> I've solved that in the
>>> preinst script by 'rm -rf /usr/include/libfm' and I thought yet that was
>>> a right step since upgrade 1.0.
Hello!
Nikolaus Rath has written on Saturday, 29 September, at 18:56:
>"Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
>> I've solved that in the
>> preinst script by 'rm -rf /usr/include/libfm' and I thought yet that was
>> a right step since upgrade 1.0.1 -> 1.0.2 went smooth.
>Somehow that sounds like a re
"Andrej N. Gritsenko" writes:
> I've solved that in the
> preinst script by 'rm -rf /usr/include/libfm' and I thought yet that was
> a right step since upgrade 1.0.1 -> 1.0.2 went smooth.
Somehow that sounds like a really bad idea to me. Admittedly manually
placing some file in /usr/include/libfm
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:26:57PM +0200, Frank Bauer wrote:
> I am considering migrating my Debian testing system to a SSD to speed things
> up.
> Since SSD lifetime is severely limited (about 5000 overwrites for
> consumer grade MLC), I wanted to know beforehand, how much writes does
> my system
[Henri Salo]
> Has there been any progress with this project? I am glad to help if
> there is something I can do? This is needed in my opinion.
You could try to run the scripts I created in the debian-security svn
repository, and see how they could be improved. I have not had time
to work much on
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:26:57 +0200, Frank Bauer wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
> I am considering migrating my Debian testing system to a SSD to speed things
> up. Since SSD lifetime is severely limited (about 5000 overwrites for
> consumer grade MLC), I wanted to know beforehand, how much writes does
> my
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 07:59:26PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Silvio Cesare]
> > I recently ran the tool and cross referenced identified code copies with
> > Debian's security tracking of affected packages by CVE. I did this for all
> > CVEs in 2010, 2011, and 2012.
>
> This sound like a
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2012 à 07:49 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> > You can either run your own bot (debian package kgb-bot), or use ours. As
> > for the client, alioth does not have it installed, but you can run it off
> > /home/groups/kgb.
>
> It's installed now.
Thanks to everyone invo
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Eric Valette wrote:
> On 29/09/2012 12:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >If you want to use non-modular, built-in microcode, the documentation of
> >iucode-tool does explain how to trigger the microcode reload after boot. You
> >will have to add it to your system yourse
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: edtsurf
* URL : http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/EDTSurf/
* License : custom, DFSG-free
Programming Lang: C++
Description : triangulated mesh surfaces for protein structures
EDTSurf is a op
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 05:31:40PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> In my case, this is quite complicated. I have done all this to allow a
> user to install its own plugin in /var/lib/roundcube/plugins but if he
> did install some plugins in /usr/share/roundcube/plugins because of the
> symlink probl
Hi,
Le 29/09/2012 11:17, Andrej N. Gritsenko a écrit :
> I supposedly not much understand how dpkg does this but my question
> is - isn't it simpler to delete directory in preinst?
There are corner cases where it simply doesn't work as expected (and
some symlinked files are deleted, e.g. #68
Hello!
Vincent Bernat has written on Saturday, 29 September, at 17:31:
> ❦ 29 septembre 2012 17:17 CEST, "Andrej N. Gritsenko" :
>>>This is indeed intentional, that dpkg never replaces directories with
>>>symlinks if directory is present, see [1] and [2] (under 4.).
>>
>>> [1]: http://bugs.d
❦ 29 septembre 2012 13:01 CEST, Andreas Beckmann :
>> Thanks for the pointers! I now understand why this does not
>> work. Fixing in postinst is quite difficult since I have swapped
>> symlinks and, from the bug reports, successive installs make the
>> situation worst (things got installed in th
❦ 29 septembre 2012 17:17 CEST, "Andrej N. Gritsenko" :
>>This is indeed intentional, that dpkg never replaces directories with
>>symlinks if directory is present, see [1] and [2] (under 4.).
>
>> [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/404850
>> [2]:
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintain
Hello!
Salvatore Bonaccorso has written on Saturday, 29 September, at 12:35:
>This is indeed intentional, that dpkg never replaces directories with
>symlinks if directory is present, see [1] and [2] (under 4.).
> [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/404850
> [2]:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-p
On 29/09/2012 12:32, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
If you want to use non-modular, built-in microcode, the documentation of
iucode-tool does explain how to trigger the microcode reload after boot. You
will have to add it to your system yourself.
Fair enough. Already done. However, during
On 2012-09-29 12:47, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 29 septembre 2012 12:35 CEST, Salvatore Bonaccorso :
>
>>> In roundcube package, I am turning existing directories to symlinks and
>>> symlinks into directories. It seems that dpkg does not like that:
>>> symlinks are not replaced with the appropria
❦ 29 septembre 2012 12:35 CEST, Salvatore Bonaccorso :
>> In roundcube package, I am turning existing directories to symlinks and
>> symlinks into directories. It seems that dpkg does not like that:
>> symlinks are not replaced with the appropriate directories. I didn't
>> find anything about th
❦ 29 septembre 2012 11:59 CEST, Vincent Bernat :
> In roundcube package, I am turning existing directories to symlinks and
> symlinks into directories. It seems that dpkg does not like that:
> symlinks are not replaced with the appropriate directories. I didn't
> find anything about this in the
Hi Vincent
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:59:38AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> In roundcube package, I am turning existing directories to symlinks and
> symlinks into directories. It seems that dpkg does not like that:
> symlinks are not replaced with the appropriate directories. I didn't
> find any
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012, Eric Valette wrote:
> On 29/09/2012 03:46, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >1. No html, please.
> >
> >non-initrd is supported. Read the package documentation for the details.
>
> I did. I do not want to compile microcode tool as a module because
Currently using microco
Unless under very specific circumstances, the use of a modular
kernel brings one the ability to replace the particular hardware
the system runs on at will.
If I do taylor my kernel for my machine, I do not care at all
Say, it's possible to replace a just burn
Hi!
In roundcube package, I am turning existing directories to symlinks and
symlinks into directories. It seems that dpkg does not like that:
symlinks are not replaced with the appropriate directories. I didn't
find anything about this in the documentation. How should I handle such
cases?
--
Make
> Eric Valette writes:
[…]
> I do not want to compile microcode tool as a module because module
> loading juts slows down the boot process and contrarilly to many
> other package requiring firmware, this one does not enable to load
> firmware when not compiled as a module.
> So it does
On 29/09/2012 03:46, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
1. No html, please.
non-initrd is supported. Read the package documentation for the details.
I did. I do not want to compile microcode tool as a module because
module loading juts slows down the boot process and contrarilly to many
o
29 matches
Mail list logo