The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 454 (new: 0)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 139 (new: 0)
Total number of packages request
On Thu 20 Sep 2012 13:59:52 Andrey Rahmatullin escribió:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:34:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > So I finally managed to get my C++ symbols file generated. However
> >
> > before shooting myself in the foot, I'd like to know if I need to
> > generate the symbol f
Marco d'Itri Linux.IT> writes:
[snip]
>
> Or just:
>
> echo ' ' > /sys/bus/usb/drivers/usbhid/remove_id
> modprobe your_driver
>
Tried this but it seems the PIC is buggier than I thought. There are
times when it disconnects and reconnects itself. As soon as the
reconnect happens, usb
On 2012-09-20 18:52, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-09-18 09:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Just to give a short impression what we can find here:
>
>> guile-1.6-dev_1.6.8-10.1
>> /usr/lib/libguile-ltdl.la
>> /usr/lib/libguile.la
>> /usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.la
>> /usr/lib/l
* Andreas Beckmann , 2012-09-20, 18:52:
Actually, we have lintian errors on the packages in the archive:
E: guile-1.6-libs: md5sum-mismatch usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-1.la
E: guile-1.6-libs: md5sum-mismatch usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.la
E: guile-1.6-libs: md5sum-mismatch usr/lib/li
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:34:36PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> So I finally managed to get my C++ symbols file generated. However
> before shooting myself in the foot, I'd like to know if I need to
> generate the symbol file using -fvisibility=hidden or not ?
Theoretically, it is much bette
On 2012-09-18 09:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Just to give a short impression what we can find here:
> guile-1.6-dev_1.6.8-10.1
> /usr/lib/libguile-ltdl.la
> /usr/lib/libguile.la
> /usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.la
> /usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-1.la
> /usr/lib/libguilereadlin
Hi,
So I finally managed to get my C++ symbols file generated. However
before shooting myself in the foot, I'd like to know if I need to
generate the symbol file using -fvisibility=hidden or not ? The output
of pkgkde-gensymbols/pkgkde-symbolshelper[1] seems to be drastically
affected by having/
> martin f krafft writes:
[…]
> So the solution was to get one or two additional people, and
> eventually I was even able to invest in more fail-proof hardware.
> … and then you ask yourself what to do with all the spare cycles and
> wouldn't other LUGs profit from your setup… And you
Personally, I think l.d.o would be an appropriate home for such things, but I
believe the decision is one for the list server admins. Having said that, I
think efforts are underway so that the alioth-hosted lists are moved to the
l.d.o infrastructure, precicely because it is recognised that running
Hello,
Thank you for your mail.
The reason MATE is not in Debian is that nobody has put the work in to make it
so. In Debian, things happen thanks to developers putting effort in, usually in
their spare time. Whilst it's true that some people believe MATE should not be
included in Debian, they d
On 09/20/2012 01:58 AM, superuserlaptop wrote:
Mate Desktop environment (http://www.mate-desktop.org)
I am writing in support of Mate DE. In less than a year a few people
have designed an alternative to Gnome 3.
I have been averaging one reconditioned HP Compaq nc6400 laptop per
quarter year, f
12 matches
Mail list logo
