On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 03:44:37PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Java and Haskell are compiled, but not interpreted languages.
Haskell is sometimes interpreted.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:27:02 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> 2) Each source and binary package (+ core parts) is considered a legal
> entity of its own. That's why we can refer to licensing texts existing
> in common-licenses, but for e.g. Apache license cannot refer to the text
> shipped wit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: libmime-util-java
Version : 2.1.3
Upstream Author : Marco Schulze ,
Steven McArdle
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/mime-ut
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: parboiled
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : mathias(at)decodified(dot)com
* URL : http://parboiled.org
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: libpegdown-java
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : mathias(at)decodified(dot)com
* URL : http://pegdown.org
* License : Apache License 2.0
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Koch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: libjuniversalchardet-java
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Kohei TAKETA
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/juniversalchardet
* License : MPL 1.1
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:59:33PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > The attached patch does the following:
>
> Attached are some patches based on devscipts+git plus your original
> patch.
I forgot to mention that my patch was also based on devscripts git and I
wonder whether somebody from the de
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Another problem is that the DFSG-freeness of the material contained in a
> (source) package is no longer a "local" property. If one day the package
> containing the corresponding source vanishes from the archive, unrelated
> packages,
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2012, 23:28 +0200 schrieb Ondřej Surý:
> Chris, this is surely not critical severity. I have cloned your bug
> report, assigned it a right severity and retitled it to "mime-support:
> use of text/ for interpreted languages is discouraged" since we have
> several interpreted la
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- --- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: caffeine
Version: 2.4.1
Upstream Author: [NAME ]
URL: https://launchpad.net/caffeine
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:34:28PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> On 12-08-25 at 01:03pm, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > a paragraph must not contain multiple instances of the same field.
>
> Interesting. Where is that defined?
Policy, 5.1, "Syntax of control files"
(http://www.deb
Hi Charles,
On 12-08-25 at 01:03pm, Charles Plessy wrote:
> a paragraph must not contain multiple instances of the same field.
Interesting. Where is that defined?
- Jonas
P.S.
I realize now that in this conversations I've wrongly used "section"
when referring to "paragraph", and "paragraph
On 12-08-24 at 07:13pm, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ben Finney writes:
>
> > It seems to me that the primary objection to the presence of these
> > files without source is that they are then distributed as part of
> > Debian, in the source package. That violates our social contract.
>
> The counter-
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 07:13:01PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The counter-argument from affected maintainers is that we *do* have the
> source. It just happens to be in a different source package. We even
> know that, because when we build the binary package we use the version of
> the Javascri
On 12-08-24 at 01:06pm, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:33:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > Files-Excluded:
> > > # ignore copy of lua
> > > lua_5.1.4/
> […]
> > Above means inventing a *new* syntax for files, instead of reusing
> > the existing one from Fil
Le Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:24:06AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:03:03PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > I also think that the current proposal would be a good opportunity to
> > transfer
> > the information about source location and excluded files in a separate f
Le Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:42:38AM +0200, Ondřej Surý a écrit :
>
> * The fix for second bug #670945 (e.g. http://localhost/file not
> caught by mod_negotiation) was fixed in mime-support 3.52-1.1.
The two bug reporters, the apache maintainer and me are all saying that this
bug should be fixed in
dear all,
sorry, I had completely forgotten that the debdelta signing key was to
expire on 20th August; I have issued a new one; to import it, save it
from attachment and issue, as root
# gpg --home /etc/debdelta/gnupg/ --import 2012_signed.key
I will upload a new 'debdelta' package containing t
18 matches
Mail list logo
