On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:01:33 +0200
Jerome Benoit wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Jerome Benoit
>
> * Package name: libpam-ssh
> Version : 1.97
> Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
> * URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
> * License : BS
Hello Again:
On 16/08/12 02:20, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Is there a simple and efficient way to do so ?
Sorry, I do not get how to figure out the ones closed by the removal:
can you put it in other words ?
When closing bugs, we can mark them as f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jerome Benoit
* Package name: libpam-ssh
Version : 1.97
Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer
* URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : Authenticate using SSH keys
Thi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aaron Schrab
* Package name: mailscanner
Version : 4.84.5.2
Upstream Author : Julian Field
* URL : http://www.mailscanner.info
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : email gateway for virus scanning
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Is there a simple and efficient way to do so ?
> Sorry, I do not get how to figure out the ones closed by the removal:
> can you put it in other words ?
When closing bugs, we can mark them as fixed in some version. When
removing packages, th
On 16/08/12 01:40, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
libpam-ssh
http://packages.debian.org/sid/libpam-ssh
The removal information is here:
http://bugs.debian.org/650644
In addition to what I mentioned, you should unarchive and reopen any
bugs that we
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I really don't know, and I am a DD.
With much more pro-active removals happening these days we tend to get
a lot of folks wanting to reintroduce removed packages, perhaps we
need a comprehensive section in devref about this. I will file a
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> libpam-ssh
>
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/libpam-ssh
The removal information is here:
http://bugs.debian.org/650644
In addition to what I mentioned, you should unarchive and reopen any
bugs that were closed by the removal (those with
On 15 August 2012 23:45, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List:
>
> I would like to adopt a recently removed package:
> The package have still a Sid webpage, but accordingly there is no more
> maintainer;
> but there is a maintainer in its Squeeze webpage.
>
> How may I proceed to adopt it ?
>
I real
Hi:
On 16/08/12 01:12, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I would like to adopt a recently removed package:
The package have still a Sid webpage, but accordingly there is no more
maintainer;
but there is a maintainer in its Squeeze webpage.
How may I procee
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I would like to adopt a recently removed package:
> The package have still a Sid webpage, but accordingly there is no more
> maintainer;
> but there is a maintainer in its Squeeze webpage.
>
> How may I proceed to adopt it ?
Which package?
Hi:
On 16/08/12 00:54, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote:
Hi,
Just read this: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
I read it before sending my previous email.
what is not clear to me is the status of the Package, hence my email:
is it orphaned ? is it still maintained ? is it considered as a new
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:45:31AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List:
>
> I would like to adopt a recently removed package:
> The package have still a Sid webpage, but accordingly there is no more
> maintainer;
> but there is a maintainer in its Squeeze webpage.
>
> How may I proceed to a
Hi,
Just read this: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno Patiño
Debian Developer
.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
: :' : Free Operating Systems
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- GPG Fingerprint:
C2C8 904E 314C D8FA 041D 9B00 D5FD FC15 6168 BF60
Registered GNU
Hello List:
I would like to adopt a recently removed package:
The package have still a Sid webpage, but accordingly there is no more
maintainer;
but there is a maintainer in its Squeeze webpage.
How may I proceed to adopt it ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-deve
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:15:20PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 01:00:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > /usr/games is a swamp for another time I think. I guess it contains
> > > an awful lot of things with clashing names.
>
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:15:20PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 01:00:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > /usr/games is a swamp for another time I think. I guess it contains
> > an awful lot of things with clashing names.
> Last I checked the latest FHS drafts removed /usr/g
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 01:00:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> /usr/games is a swamp for another time I think. I guess it contains
> an awful lot of things with clashing names.
Last I checked the latest FHS drafts removed /usr/games entirely, so the
morass might end up being dumped into /usr/bin
18 matches
Mail list logo
