On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 10:44:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It was implemented because at the time ubuntu-devel had a very low signal to
> noise ratio and developers were getting frustrated (sound familiar). My
> opinion is that it worked pretty well.
> Most of the noise immediately shif
On Friday, May 04, 2012 11:17:24 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Not enough information to check signature validity. Show Details
> On Jue 03 May 2012 08:23:29 Stefano Zacchiroli escribió:
> [snip]
>
> > 3) public, but contributors-only list
> >
> >
> >
> > This has been implem
On Jue 03 May 2012 08:23:29 Stefano Zacchiroli escribió:
[snip]
> 3) public, but contributors-only list
>
> This has been implemented by other FOSS projects. A notable example is
> Ubuntu who have a split between ubuntu-devel (project members only +
> whitelisting) and ubuntu-devel-discuss (free
Hi Patrick,
On 12-05-03 at 05:28pm, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:13:09PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> >
> > Drat. I forgot about APRS. APRS has become fairly popular among
> > hams, so much so that it now comes built-in to several radios, and
> > even HTs (Handy-Talkie
On 12-05-02 at 05:10pm, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:22:05PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we should short-circuit this part of the conversation, since
> > it doesn't sound like you're horribly interested in agreeing to
> > change the name of node in the exist
On Vie 04 May 2012 18:13:01 Russ Allbery escribió:
[big snip]
I think Russ' proposal is quite a nice solution.
Kinds regards, Lisandro.
--
The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by
the following formula:
pi zz a
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer
On 12-05-03 at 10:40am, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Patrick Ouellette writes:
> > How many people use Node.js? I had never heard of it until this
> > came up, and I work in IT with web development teams.
>
> Relative numbers really isn't the point, and I'm sorry I distracted us
> all with that. The
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:03:55AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du vendredi 04 mai 2012, vers 06:11,
> Hamish Moffatt disait :
>
> > Secondly if node.js is usually just used via #!, I'm not sure why it's in
> > $PATH at all - why not in /usr/lib?
>
> Neithe
2012/5/4 Marco d'Itri :
> On May 02, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
>> -Architecture: any
>> +Architecture: linux-any
> Robert, don't you have anything better to do with your time than NMU'ing
> other people's packages with cosmetic issues?
> I obviously do not want to dictate how you should
David Kalnischkies writes:
> Completely ignoring the mail itself and just referring to the title
> (beside ignoring even the first word in that): "repository format is
> not documented" is a valid bug - and it should be documented for the
> benefit of people who write the various tools used to g
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Michal Suchanek
wrote:
> This, however, does not apply the apt-ftparchive. It is supposed to
> create the required files fully automatically. With the provided
> documentation I was able to make it do exactly nothing, fully
> automatically.
For the record: This was
> libav -> x264 -> libav
AFAICT the x264 frontend uses libav whereas libav uses the libx264 shared
library. So theortically (!) this issue could be solved by two separate
source packages for the x264 frontend and the library.
- Fabian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.de
On May 4, 2012 4:43 PM, "Fabian Greffrath" wrote:
>
> > libav -> x264 -> libav
>
> AFAICT the x264 frontend uses libav whereas libav uses the libx264 shared
> library. So theortically (!) this issue could be solved by two separate
> source packages for the x264 frontend and the library.
>
> - Fab
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Prokop
* Package name: carton
Version : 0.9.5+git8e653
Upstream Author : Tatsuhiko Miyagawa
* URL : https://github.com/miyagawa/carton
* License : GPL-1+ or Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl
Description :
On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:49:34 +0200
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: important
>
> I wanted to create a repository of my own packages so that I can use the
> standard Debian tools to install these packages and resolve any
> dependencies automatically.
Use better tools - repr
Hello,
On Fri, 4 May 2012 16:34:30 +0200
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> > That doesn't look cosmetic to me. That looks like an FTBFS fix for
> > kfreeBSD, which he gave you 5 months to do yourself before NMUing
> > it.
> Since the package did not work before and will not work after, I do
>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Pau,
>
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 04:24:21PM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> Regarding the often-mentioned "many users run 'node script' from the
>> command-line"... so what? If we can get enough distributions (Debian,
>> Suse, Fedora,
Hi Pau,
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 04:24:21PM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> Regarding the often-mentioned "many users run 'node script' from the
> command-line"... so what? If we can get enough distributions (Debian,
> Suse, Fedora, MacPorts and brew would likely be enough) to rename the
> node
Package: general
Severity: important
Hello,
I wanted to create a repository of my own packages so that I can use the
standard Debian tools to install these packages and resolve any
dependencies automatically.
However, there is no documentation of the format of these repositories.
There are mult
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Taku YASUI
* Package name: tdiary-contrib
Version : 20120504
Upstream Author : TADA Tadashi
* URL : http://www.tdiary.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Ruby
Description : Misc plugins and utilities for
Neil Williams writes:
> Dominique Dumont wrote:
>> We, sdl maintainers, made a recent change in our package by removing
>> unnecessary build depends on -dev packages [1].
> ... at which point you should have looked at the list of reverse
> dependencies and done some tests yourselves before upl
The Fungi writes:
> I think this is part of the misunderstanding. If these systems are nodes
> on an AX.25 network, what's being renamed (and potentially broken) is
> the userspace binary which connects the machine to the network. Think of
> it as if you're suggesting a rename of /usr/sbin/sshd t
On May 04, Wookey wrote:
> That doesn't look cosmetic to me. That looks like an FTBFS fix for
> kfreeBSD, which he gave you 5 months to do yourself before NMUing it.
Since the package did not work before and will not work after, I do not
consider this strictly a FTBFS bug.
--
ciao,
Marco
sig
+++ Marco d'Itri [2012-05-04 16:01 +0200]:
> On May 02, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>
> > -Architecture: any
> > +Architecture: linux-any
> Robert, don't you have anything better to do with your time than NMU'ing
> other people's packages with cosmetic issues?
> I obviously do not want to
Hi,
What are other distributions doing?
I've check and OpenSuse apparently lives happy with having
/usr/sbin/node for axnode and /usr/bin/node for node.js. Has anyone
contacted them about this?
Regarding the often-mentioned "many users run 'node script' from the
command-line"... so what? If we c
Le Thu, May 03, 2012 at 12:39:04PM -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
>
> Consider a package that contains a node.js script, which is not the
> primary purpose of the package. So it Recommends, rather than depends
> on nodejs. (Let's assume it uses #!/usr/bin/env node, and for the sake
> of example is som
On May 02, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> -Architecture: any
> +Architecture: linux-any
Robert, don't you have anything better to do with your time than NMU'ing
other people's packages with cosmetic issues?
I obviously do not want to dictate how you should spend your time, but
is kfreebsd a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniele Tricoli
* Package name: python-oauthlib
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Idan Gazit
* URL : https://github.com/idangazit/oauthlib
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Generic,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Maarten L. Hekkelman"
* Package name: libzeep
Version : 2.9.0
Upstream Author : Maarten L. Hekkelman
* URL : http://www.cmbi.ru.nl/libzeep
* License : Boost-1.0
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A C++ library
]] Thibaut Paumard
> Le 04/05/12 00:29, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> >
> > [Patrick Lauer]
> >> 1.0_pre20120503 maybe
> >
> > That'd be wrong if you expect a real _alpha, _beta or _pre of the given
> > version in the future. I think in that case you'd need something like
> > 1.0_alpha_alpha2012
On 04. mai 2012 01:29, Roger Lynn wrote:
On 02/05/12 02:00, brian m. carlson wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:47:08PM +0100, Roger Lynn wrote:
I have enabled accept_8bitmime in every exim I've installed for the last
10 years and no one has reported any problems. I think the risk of
encounterin
On 2012-05-04 09:03:19 +0100 (+0100), Jon Dowland wrote:
[...]
> So some form of access to the machine would be required to create
> the problem, be it physical or remote. The same access should be
> used to fix the problem.
[...]
I think this is part of the misunderstanding. If these systems are
On Fri, 4 May 2012 10:08:44 +0200
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> We, sdl maintainers, made a recent change in our package by removing
> unnecessary build depends on -dev packages [1].
... at which point you should have looked at the list of reverse
dependencies and done some tests yourselves before
2012/5/4 Игорь Пашев
> x11-utils
xfonts-utils
When I meet circular build deps:
1. Just get sources and try to build, satisfying what possible.
Some deps required for docs or tests and may be ignored for the first time.
2. If a build dep is really required to build (I remember x11-utils), I
install it separately
from sources into /usr/local
Andres Mejia writes:
> On May 3, 2012 10:20 AM, "Andres Mejia" wrote:
>>
>> On May 3, 2012 9:30 AM, "Pino Toscano" wrote:
>> >
>> > Alle giovedì 3 maggio 2012, Andres Mejia ha scritto:
>> > > On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
>> > > > Package: libav
>> > > > Version: 6:0.8.1-
Hello
We, sdl maintainers, made a recent change in our package by removing
unnecessary build depends on -dev packages [1].
Unfortunately, some package did rely on this "extra" dependencies and went
ftbs [2].
Now is the question of possible impact (FTBS) on all packages build-depending
on sdl
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 04:20:46PM -0400, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:11:41PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >
> > > You also don't address the issue of a user who installs both packages
> > > and now gets varying behavior depending on their $PATH - a result not
> > > of
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:26:33PM -0400, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> One of the considerable costs involves the number of systems in place in
> the ham community that are not easily physically accessible should the
> upgrade/change break the system. These systems may be on mountain tops,
> high bu
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du vendredi 04 mai 2012, vers 06:11,
Hamish Moffatt disait :
> Secondly if node.js is usually just used via #!, I'm not sure why it's in
> $PATH at all - why not in /usr/lib?
Neither "#!/usr/bin/node" nor "#!/usr/bin/env node" will work then.
--
Vincent Ber
Le 04/05/12 00:29, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
>
> [Patrick Lauer]
>> 1.0_pre20120503 maybe
>
> That'd be wrong if you expect a real _alpha, _beta or _pre of the given
> version in the future. I think in that case you'd need something like
> 1.0_alpha_alpha20120503 or 1.0_alpha_pre20120503.
>
1
41 matches
Mail list logo
