On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 23:19 +0200, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Svante Signell wrote:
..
> and that key (it looks like two keys really...A92F9FF4 is for
> debian-ports.org) is installed in the keyring?
> sudo apt-key list
>
> if not
> either install
>debian-ports-archi
tags #669570 + wontfix
thanks
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:27:59PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, April 20, 2012 04:12:56 AM Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Dmitry Nezhevenko
> >
> > * Package name: reviewboard-rbtools
> > Version
On Friday, April 20, 2012 04:12:56 AM Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Dmitry Nezhevenko
>
> * Package name: reviewboard-rbtools
> Version : 0.4.1
> Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, David Trowbridge
> * URL : http://www.reviewb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Nezhevenko
* Package name: reviewboard-rbtools
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, David Trowbridge
* URL : http://www.reviewboard.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 413 (new: 7)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 165 (new: 6)
Total number of packages request
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvain Le Gall
* Package name: ocamlmod
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Sylvain Le Gall
* URL : http://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/ocamlmod
* License : LGPL-2.1 with OCaml linking exception
Programming Lang: OCaml
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 23:19 +0200, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > Hi, when apt-get update the following happens when updating from a port
> > (that doesn't have a valid public key):
>
> This has been the case for years. Since secure apt got defaul
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Svante Signell wrote:
Hi, when apt-get update the following happens when updating from a port
(that doesn't have a valid public key):
This has been the case for years. Since secure apt got default at least.
No problems before 0.9.x??
Ign http://ftp.debian-ports.org unre
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:44:06PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Dmitry Nezhevenko
>
> > This is where Django Evolution fits in. Django Evolution is an
> > extension to Django that allows you to track changes in your models
> > over time, and to update the database to reflect those changes.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:44:06PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Dmitry Nezhevenko
>
> > This is where Django Evolution fits in. Django Evolution is an
> > extension to Django that allows you to track changes in your models
> > over time, and to update the database to reflect those changes.
Hi, when apt-get update the following happens when updating from a port
(that doesn't have a valid public key):
No problems before 0.9.x??
Ign http://ftp.debian-ports.org unreleased/main
Translation-en
W: GPG error: http://ftp.debian-ports.org unreleased Release: Th
Hello,
A new version of ifupdown has been uploaded to experimental yesterday, which
brings some important changes.
First of all, now it's possible to specify default values for various
interface configuration options. This eliminates the need of hard coding
of them in C source, as Ubuntu has been
]] Dmitry Nezhevenko
> This is where Django Evolution fits in. Django Evolution is an
> extension to Django that allows you to track changes in your models
> over time, and to update the database to reflect those changes.
How does it compare with South?
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly
]] Roger Leigh
> Could you provide examples please? If there are init scripts which
> it can't handle, that's a bug. Either in insserv or (more likely)
> the scripts.
It fails to handle the case where something provides a virtual facility,
at least. It also seems to think that /etc/init.d/../
Hi -devel (and -lsb),
Le mercredi, 4 avril 2012 11.35:49, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> I have recently uploaded lsb-base 4.1+Debian0+fancy0 to experimental. As
> this version introduces a small change that has a big visual impact on
> the Debian boot, I would like to get some feedback on it be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Nezhevenko
* Package name: python-django-evolution
Version : 0.6.7
Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, Russell Keith-Magee, Ben Khoo,
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
D
On Apr 19, 2012 10:09 AM, "Guillem Jover" wrote:
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> Continuing with my intention to try to match my current dissatisfaction
> with the project with my dedication to it, I've just orphaned the ppmd
> package.
>
> The package just got ported recently to 64-bit s
Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> That would require that the tech-ctte's decisions do not take months or
> years. They are fast if they really need to be, but in such general
> cases the time a descision takes is imho way too long and frustrating
> for all involved people. I would prefer a solution which
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Matthias Kümmerer"
* Package name: alembic
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Mike Bayer
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/alembic
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : lightweight database mig
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Continuing with my intention to try to match my current dissatisfaction
with the project with my dedication to it, I've just orphaned the ppmd
package.
The package just got ported recently to 64-bit systems so builds for
those systems need to be hand-held for now as
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Roger Leigh
>
> > (I don't know if you saw my mail regarding having done this
> > provisionally in git; I mentioned it on the pkg-sysvinit-devel
> > list and in #545976. I was wanting to additionally ask you
> > how safe it wo
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 02:57:39PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> "Hijacks" are what they say on the tin. That's not a tool that should be
> part of the toolkit, even as a weapon of last resort. We have a procedure
> for orphaning packages whose maintainers are inactive, and we have the TC to
> a
Am 18.04.2012 16:26, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 04:57:14 PM Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 04/18/2012 08:27 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
If a maintainer isn't (capable of) doing the necessary work on a
package themselves, then after a while the best thing they can do is
admit
]] Roger Leigh
> (I don't know if you saw my mail regarding having done this
> provisionally in git; I mentioned it on the pkg-sysvinit-devel
> list and in #545976. I was wanting to additionally ask you
> how safe it would be to remove the is_unsafe_to_activate check
> and just run insserv anywa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: sratom
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : David Robillard
* URL : http://drobilla.net/software/sratom/
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: C
Description : library for serialising LV2
On 04/18/2012 09:29 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Colin Watson
>
>> alioth is just a Debian-specific hosting site, not a general gateway to
>> package maintenance. We're not set up for them to be dispute resolution
>> for the whole of Debian, and they have no constitutional authority to do
>>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:01:55AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Roger Leigh]
> > I can't see why not at first glance--it's done its job, so should no
> > longer be needed.
>
> It is still needed in two use cases.
>
> 1) Machine upgraded from Lenny where the migration was not done.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dennis van Dok
* Package name: llrun
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Nikhef Grid Security Middleware Team
* URL : https://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/GLExec
* License : Apache 2
Programming Lang: C
Description : Test
[Roger Leigh]
> I can't see why not at first glance--it's done its job, so should no
> longer be needed.
It is still needed in two use cases.
1) Machine upgraded from Lenny where the migration was not done.
Either because it could not be done, or because the user choose
not to do it.
29 matches
Mail list logo
