Unstable has had /run on a tmpfs for a while now and scripts have been changed
to call mkdir as necessary.
Unfortunately some of the directories are created with the wrong SE Linux
context and need to have restorecon run on them.
As an example below is the change I needed to make to the xend st
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Hanke
* Package name: lazyarray
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Andrew P. Davison
* URL : http://bitbucket.org/apdavison/lazyarray/
* License : 3-clause-BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python mo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jakub Wilk
* Package name: lintian4python
Upstream Author : Jakub Wilk
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/jwilk/lintian4python/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Debian package checker (for Python package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bernhard Reiter
* Package name: fonts-lobster
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Pablo Impallari
* URL : http://www.impallari.com/lobster
* License : OFL-1.1
Description : bold condensed script with many ligatures an
Package: libc6
Version: 2.11.3-3
Severity: important
Tags: squeeze ipv6
After last glibc6 update 2.11.2-10 -> 2.11.3-2 resolver changed its behavior.
My setup (nothing strange):
ipv6 enabled, but no special settings for it and my local DNS zone has only A
records.
How 2.11.2-10 works:
When I ty
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "John T. Nogatch"
* Package name: fccexam
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : John T. Nogatch
* URL :
https://launchpad.net/~jnogatch/+archive/fccexam?field.series_filter=
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: awk, sh
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: utouch-geis
Version : 2.2.6
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/utouch-geis
* License : LGPL-3+
Programming L
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: utouch-grail
Version : 3.0.2
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/utouch-grail
* License : GPL-3+
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: utouch-frame
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https:launchpad.net/utouch-frame
* License : GPL-3+
Programming La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stephen M. Webb"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: utouch-evemu
Version : 1.0.8
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/utouch-evemu
* License : GPL-3
Programming L
On 2012-03-14 11:33 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> If it outputs nothing on your system, then you're fine. Otherwise
>> it should give you some instructions to follow to bring it back to a
>> coherent state.
>
> There was a bug in the script. An upda
Le lundi 05 mars 2012 à 12:11 +0100, Marc Haber a écrit :
> The migration to udev didn't cause double work for daemon maintainers.
Excuse me?
Having to support both udev and HAL just for the sake of Hurd and
kFreeBSD *is* some additional work for many packages.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 07 mars 2012 à 07:43 +0100, Marc Haber a écrit :
> The differences between systemd and openssh are that core OpenSSH does
> not work on "our" main architecture, and that there is an active
> non-Debian upstream for Portable OpenSSH. If there were something like
> "portable systemd", I
Le dimanche 04 mars 2012 à 01:39 +0100, David Weinehall a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:32:04AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > This should clearly be a whitelist. I don’t think there’s real use for a
> > blacklist, it is too dangerous.
>
> Wouldn't both be best? Let's say the whitelis
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, David Greaves wrote:
> I got the following results:
>
> root@ash:~# dpkg --version
> Debian `dpkg' package management program version 1.16.1.2 (amd64).
The script is meant for people who are using a version of dpkg with
multiarch support. You're using the current sid version
Hi
I got the following results:
root@ash:~# dpkg --version
Debian `dpkg' package management program version 1.16.1.2 (amd64).
root@ash:~# perl ~david/tmp/dpkg-chk.pl | tail
PROBLEM: gcc-4.4-base:amd64 has missing info files
SOLUTION: apt-get --reinstall install gcc-4.4-base:amd64
PROBLEM: libpwl
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Timo Weingärtner wrote:
> Why do people always forget that there is service(8)?
I personally got used to using /etc/init.d/foo before service existed.
So its not that people forget about service, but that they never
learnt about it.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.deb
On 12-03-14 at 11:06am, Adrien Poupin wrote:
> As a composer I would like to help if possible. Apparently there is no
> login-jingle for Debian, and if I would be pleased to help providing
> one.
> This could build a auditive identity for this distribution...
>
> Where should I post the informat
Hallo,
2012-03-14 um 01:30:45 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > (There's a third issue, of course, which is whose environment the daemon
> > should be inheriting -- the sanitised environment of init, or the
> > environment of the shell of whoever i
@Jon Dowland and Thibaut Paumard : Thanks a lot, I will work on that base.
--
*Adrien
*
--
Le 14 mars 2012 11:23, Jon Dowland a écrit :
> Hi Adrian, thanks for your interest in
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> If it outputs nothing on your system, then you're fine. Otherwise
> it should give you some instructions to follow to bring it back to a
> coherent state.
There was a bug in the script. An updated version is attached.
Note that it will list your forei
Le 14/03/12 11:06, Adrien Poupin a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> As a composer I would like to help if possible. Apparently there is no
> login-jingle for Debian, and if I would be pleased to help providing one.
> This could build a auditive identity for this distribution...
>
> Where should I post the in
Hi Adrian, thanks for your interest in working with Debian!
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:11:09PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> In general that sort of thing is done upstream, please contact the
> developers for your favourite desktop (GNOME, KDE, XFCE, Unity etc) if
> you want to contribute to the relev
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Adrien Poupin wrote:
> As a composer I would like to help if possible. Apparently there is no
> login-jingle for Debian, and if I would be pleased to help providing one.
> This could build a auditive identity for this distribution...
>
> Where should I post the inf
Hello,
For people who have been playing with multiarch and are scared by
Guillem's (uncoordinated) announce, I have written a small script
to detect whether you have been affected by one of the theoretical
problems that Guillem diagnosed (you only need libdpkg-perl and perl).
If it outputs nothin
Hello,
As a composer I would like to help if possible. Apparently there is no
login-jingle for Debian, and if I would be pleased to help providing one.
This could build a auditive identity for this distribution...
Where should I post the information when I have made it ?
Thanks,
--
** *Adrien.*
26 matches
Mail list logo
