J. M. Becker wrote:
> How close is cdebconf able to serve as a drop-in replacement for
> debconf? As of 06` it apparently was not, but it's been about 6 years
> from that time. I would assume the status has changes since then, but by
> how much?
Quite a lot, recently. Install it and export DEBCON
How close is cdebconf able to serve as a drop-in replacement for
debconf? As of 06` it apparently was not, but it's been about 6 years
from that time. I would assume the status has changes since then, but by
how much?
Most of the internet information around cdebconf is circa 06`, or I was
just una
Package: wnpp
Owner: Michael Stapelberg
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libprivileges-drop-perl
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Troels Liebe Bentsen
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Privil
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexandre LISSY
* Package name: qpdfpresenterconsole
Version : 2.5.3
Upstream Author : Alexandre Lissy
* URL : http://gitorious.org/qpdfpresenterconsole
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++
Description : This is
On 2012-03-09 15:56, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Jonathan Wiltshire , 2012-03-09, 15:29:
Over three days, 18 developers and contributors:
- closed 17 bugs as 'pseudo-squashed';
What does 'pseudo-squashed' mean?
For example, fixed in a previous upload but the maintainer forgot to
close the bug.
Ne
* Jonathan Wiltshire , 2012-03-09, 15:29:
Over three days, 18 developers and contributors:
- closed 17 bugs as 'pseudo-squashed';
What does 'pseudo-squashed' mean?
Neil Williams took the prize for most bugs sqashed in a single action,
requesting the removal of opensync and associated packages
Steve McIntyre held a BSP over the weekend 2-4 March 2012 in Cambridge
[1].
Over three days, 18 developers and contributors:
- closed 17 bugs as 'pseudo-squashed';
- followed up to 16 bugs with further information or patches;
- closed 28 bugs with uploads;
- investigated and abandoned 10 bug
Thanks for several responses -- however the underlying question I had,
whether the upload the new package to unstable or not, was not resolved.
Does anyone see any reason to delay or abstain from the upload? If not,
I'll do the upload within days.
/Simon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-deve
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dennis van Dok
* Package name: lcas-lcmaps-gt4-interface
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Grid Middleware Security Team
* URL : https://wiki.nikhef.nl/grid/Site_Access_Control
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ritesh Raj Sarraf
* Package name: appmenu-qt
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : Aurélien Gâteau
* URL : https://launchpad.net/appmenu-qt
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : appmenu for qt
appmenu
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 09:42:36AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Oleg writes:
>
> > Hello, list.
> >
> > I have /var on a separate partition. My /var/run and /var/lock mount as
> > tmpfs:
> >
> > ~$ grep RAM /etc/default/rcS
> > RAMRUN=yes
> > RAMLOCK=yes
> >
> > When i reboot or powerof
Oleg writes:
> Hello, list.
>
> I have /var on a separate partition. My /var/run and /var/lock mount as tmpfs:
>
> ~$ grep RAM /etc/default/rcS
> RAMRUN=yes
> RAMLOCK=yes
>
> When i reboot or poweroff my machine i see that unmounting of /var fail
> because
> it busy. If i include lines:
>
> umo
12 matches
Mail list logo
