Hi,
Wait a moment ... what about removing kcc package. (See below)
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 01:07:28PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jelmer Vernooij writes:
> > I think it would be reasonable for Heimdal to rename kcc to kcc.heimdal
> > or something like that.
This is, as I understand, our stand
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vasudev Kamath
* Package name: fonts-lato
Version: 1.104
Upstream Author : ��ukasz Dziedzic
* URL : http://www.latofonts.com
* License: OFL 1.1
Programming Lang: font
Description : s
Guillem Jover writes:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 16:32:38 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Guillem Jover writes:
>> > If packages have to be split anyway to cope with the other cases, then
>> > the number of new packages which might not be needed otherwise will be
>> > even smaller than the predicted
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Mar 01, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>> The situation with refcounting seems much less fragile than the situation
>> without refcounting to me.
> I totally agree.
>
> Also, why does refcounting have to be "perfect"?
> What would break if it did not actually chec
Sounds like a win to me.
The tools that might need changing:
debmirror
apt-file
UDD
collab-qa/filecontents/*-contents.py
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 09:32:04AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 27 février 2012 à 05:19 +0100, Sebastian Heinlein a écrit :
> > Am Donnerstag, den 23.02.2012, 18:46 +0200 schrieb Timo Juhani
> > Lindfors:
> > > Josselin Mouette writes:
> > > > (We even have a patch to allow only a s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: hadori
Version: 0.2
Upstream Author: Timo Weingärtner
URL: https://github.com/tiwe-de/hadori
License: GPL3+
Description: Hardlinks identical files
This might look like ye
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 23:15:16 +
Neil Williams wrote:
> opensync/multisync is a complete mess, collecting 25 RC bugs between 20
> source packages and a collective 17,626 days waiting to enter testing.
> dd-list attached.
Was so busy preparing the summary, didn't notice that the maintainer
had a
opensync/multisync is a complete mess, collecting 25 RC bugs between 20
source packages and a collective 17,626 days waiting to enter testing.
dd-list attached.
Summary:
libopensync-plugin-gnokii 1462 days old (needed 10 days) libopensync0
RC x 2
libopensync-plugin-gpe 1462 day
Jelmer Vernooij writes:
> Thanks for bringing this up.
> I think it would be reasonable for Heimdal to rename kcc to kcc.heimdal
> or something like that.
> Heimdal upstream has been shipping kcc since 2010, but we haven't
> included it in Debian before, so that probably causes the least upgrad
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 02:36:11PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Josselin Mouette writes ("Re: upstart: please update to latest upstream
> version"):
> > Or, as has been said countless times otherwise: kFreeBSD should not
> > hinder the improvement of the Linux ports.
>
> It's not just kFreeBSD. A
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 18:41 +, Edward Allcutt wrote:
> These packages do not remotely have the same functionality:
> kcc: Kanji code filter
> heimdal-clients: Heimdal Kerberos - clients
>
> kcc appears to have shipped /usr/bin/kcc approximately since 1997.
>
> heimdal-clients introduced /usr/
Hi devel,
These packages do not remotely have the same functionality:
kcc: Kanji code filter
heimdal-clients: Heimdal Kerberos - clients
kcc appears to have shipped /usr/bin/kcc approximately since 1997.
heimdal-clients introduced /usr/bin/kcc in September 2011 and #644138
was filed shortly the
On 02.03.2012 10:47, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Freitag, 2. März 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
> + * The new kernel version includes security restrictions on
links,
> +These restrictions may cause some legitimate programs to
fail.
> +In particular, if the 'at' package is installed, you should
e
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 07:43 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 05:11:58AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > + * The new kernel version includes security restrictions on links, which
> > +are enabled by default. These are specified in
> > +Documentation/sysctl/fs.txt in t
Hi
I don't think it was on -devel yet, so here it goes:
Copying from Ansgars original message:
--88---
The arch:all part of Contents-*.gz are ~15 MB of the total 20 MB per
architecture (as could be seen on Contents-armhf.gz which has no
Dear Raphael,
thank you for your update on the status of this issue
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
[...]
> Please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497779
OK thanks a lot for the link, now I understand very well what is
happening :-)
this bug is definetly l
Aron Xu dixit:
>You might be interested in reading this thread:
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/06/msg00149.html
Ok, will have a look, thanks.
>Activating LTO by default seems not to be a reasonable idea (reasons
Right, it is not.
>are in the given thread), but if maintainer of a pa
Hi
i took the BSP i am at right now to look at that pdiff shit, and after i
finished yelling at that code, we now are creating pdiff files for
changed Translation-*.bz2 too.
That is, we just started, so there is only the pdiff for the -en file
available, but whenever the other languages get updat
Sorry guys,
I really think that scripts can looks better without tabs (or without spaces
where should be tabs), but I realized that it is simply impossible to get one
style for scripts.
Even in *skeleton* almost everywhere used tabs, but in few places (where should
be tabs) — spaces.
I was wro
* Matthias Klumpp:
> He does not want portability patches in systemd, because much
> invasive changes would be needed, making the code more difficult to
> read (which might even lead to buggy code).
It seems that this also applies to older Linux versions. According to
the documentation, the curr
21 matches
Mail list logo
