On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Currently in unstable there are around 30 packages which depend on
> Tcl/Tk 8.4, which is quite old itself despite the fact that updates are
> still released for it. Tcl/Tk 8.5 is available for more than 4 years,
> Tcl/Tk 8.6 is coming soon
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:45 PM, vangelis wrote:
> I want to join a group in wnpp list to test my self helping developing so i
> can start slowly.
> How can i do that?
I'm not sure how to answer your question, but maybe one of these links helps:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
http://wnpp.deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joseph Nahmias
* Package name: edgar
Version : 0.94
Upstream Author : Richard Sweeney
* URL : http://www.parallelrealities.co.uk/p/legend-of-edgar.html
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : The Lege
Fernando Lemos writes:
> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> ACK. Sometimes upstreams doing really stange things (maybe because they
>> dont have any package management in mind), that should be fixed. If
>> upstream doesnt do those fixes, distros have to catch in.
Sometimes, I think Red Hat makes some of
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Adam Borowski schrieb:
> > On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> > > It DOES NOT MATTER who is right, some up
Josh Triplett writes:
> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> I have a general objection against putting (default) configs outside
>> /etc at all. The main problem is, on updates, defaults might silently
>> change, without operators used to look at /etc and comparing current
>> config with new defaults.
> By
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Adam Borowski schrieb:
>> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> > On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
>> > It DOES NOT
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Tanguy Ortolo schrieb:
> > I think having the default configuration values written in a default
> > configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since
> > it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are. But not
> > shipping the user c
* Adam Borowski schrieb:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> >
> > > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> > It DOES NOT MATTER who is right, some upstreams have decided otherwise.
>
* Tanguy Ortolo schrieb:
> Enrico Weigelt, 2011-12-30 06:21+0100:
> > Which packages ship files in /var ?
>
> Many install directories there. And one of my packages, dokuwiki, also
> installs files under /var/lib/dokuwiki/lib/{plugins,tpl}. These files
> define the default set of bundled plugins
* Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez schrieb:
> I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> should ship this files in the package in order to let the admin know
> what package each file belongs to. Its very ugly to do a "dpkg -S
> /etc/xxx" and get a no path found.
>
> If som
* Tanguy Ortolo schrieb:
> I think having the default configuration values written in a default
> configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since
> it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are. But not
> shipping the user configuration file, I do not kno
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:51:18 +
810d4rk <810d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi to all, is anyone interested in evaristo?
>
If you're interested in packaging evaristo for Debian you should have a
look at http://wiki.debian.org/HowToPackageForDebian and file an ITP
(Intent To Package) [0].
If you do
The free GPL licensed version could be included in the repos, what do you think?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/evaristo/
On 31/12/2011, 810d4rk <810d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi to all, is anyone interested in evaristo?
>
> Evaristo is an ERP solution written in Java (2 tier), though only
> avail
Hi to all, is anyone interested in evaristo?
Evaristo is an ERP solution written in Java (2 tier), though only
available in Portuguese, since version 4 is fully internationalizable.
It requires a PostgreSQL database in order to store the data.
DGCI certification is required for the use in commerci
> Josh Triplett, 2011-12-30 16:09+0100:
> > A de-facto standard has already emerged for how to ship the standard
> > configuration in /usr/lib and handle overrides,
>
> I do not think this is a de facto standard at all yet. What pieces of
> software use apply it? The length of that list should be
Le vendredi 30 décembre 2011 à 19:20 +0100, Svante Signell a écrit :
> I'm very reluctant to upgrade to gnome3, I have it on one box, and
> don't like it. I want workspaces related to different tasks, like
> programming, web browsing, watching a video, listening to music, etc.
> That could involve
On 12/30/2011 07:20 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> I'm very reluctant to upgrade to gnome3, I have it on one box, and
> don't like it. I want workspaces related to different tasks, like
> programming, web browsing, watching a video, listening to music, etc.
> That could involve e.g. having terminals,
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 00:09 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 28 novembre 2011 19:56 +0100, Svante Signell a crit :
> > As many people (including me) are very disappointed in gnome3, switching
> > from a very configurable desktop environment in gnome2 to a almost not
> > configurable tabl
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 06:56 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Package: iw
> > > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > Justification: policy §2.5
> > >
> > > aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is
Josh Triplett, 2011-12-30 16:09+0100:
> A de-facto standard has already emerged for how to ship the standard
> configuration in /usr/lib and handle overrides,
I do not think this is a de facto standard at all yet. What pieces of
software use apply it? The length of that list should be compared to
Hi
On Friday 30 December 2011, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Package: iw
> > > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > Justification: policy §2.5
> > >
> > > aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is op
Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Every package which will accept a configuration file in /etc should ship
> such a file in /etc, even if it contains only comments. In this way, you
> know the name(s) of the configuration file(s) and the subdirectory in
> /etc where they belong.
A de-facto standard has alrea
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Package: iw
> > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > Severity: important
> > Justification: policy §2.5
> >
> > aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is optional and the latter of
> > priority "extra". Please bump up the pr
On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 15:16 +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Friday 30 December 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > > Package: iw
> > > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > > Severity: important
> > > Justification: policy §2.5
> > >
> >
Hi
On Friday 30 December 2011, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Package: iw
> > Version: 0.9.19-1
> > Severity: important
> > Justification: policy §2.5
> >
> > aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is optional and the latter of
> > priority
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:00:23PM +, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> I think having the default configuration values written in a default
> configuration file under /usr is better than having them harcoded, since
> it makes it really easier to determine what these defaults are.
It's problematic if the
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez, 2011-12-30 14:22+0100:
> I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> should ship this files in the package in order to let the admin know
> what package each file belongs to. Its very ugly to do a "dpkg -S
> /etc/xxx" and get a no path found.
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 02:47:38PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
> > I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
> It DOES NOT MATTER who is right, some upstreams have decided otherwise.
> At least udev, systemd and next mont
On Dec 30, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> I think that stephan is right here. Every package using files in /etc
It DOES NOT MATTER who is right, some upstreams have decided otherwise.
At least udev, systemd and next month module-init-tools do override the
configuration files in /usr/lib/ wi
You may want to take a look at the Community Distribution Patent
Policy FAQ, prepared for Debian by the SFLC:
http://www.debian.org/reports/patent-faq
IIRC the DPL is working on more patent related stuff too.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-de
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 16:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Package: iw
> Version: 0.9.19-1
> Severity: important
> Justification: policy §2.5
>
> aircrack-ng depends on iw, but the former is optional and the latter of
> priority "extra". Please bump up the priority of iw to optional to
> match.
On 30/12/11 12:48, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 30, Stephan Seitz wrote:
>
>> > Every package which will accept a configuration file in /etc should
>> > ship such a file in /etc, even if it contains only comments. In this
> This train has already passed and you lost it, sorry.
>
I think that st
On Dec 30, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> due to demand by a coworker I've taken #625611 and started to prepare
> a package for the exFAT fuse driver and the utils package.
Debian, as policy, ignores patents which are not being actively and
widely enforced.
So feel free to upload.
--
ciao,
Marco
sign
hi folks,
I want to join a group in wnpp list to test my self helping
developing so i can start slowly.
How can i do that?
best regards
gnugr
--
On Dec 30, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> Every package which will accept a configuration file in /etc should
> ship such a file in /etc, even if it contains only comments. In this
This train has already passed and you lost it, sorry.
> And where do you want to put the package information which are
> cu
Hello,
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:43:29 +0300
Andrew Shadura wrote:
> So I'd like the maintainers of the packages which still depend on
> Tcl/Tk 8.4 to update their packages to build against/use newer Tcl/Tk
> versions.
Also, I'd like to ask, that if possible, try to fix change the packages
so they
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 05:36:40PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
top-level directories would look after a move from / to /usr. Also, the
FHS says nothing about the current approach of overriding files in /usr
with files in /etc, which allows packages to stop shipping configuration
files in /etc th
Hello,
Currently in unstable there are around 30 packages which depend on
Tcl/Tk 8.4, which is quite old itself despite the fact that updates are
still released for it. Tcl/Tk 8.5 is available for more than 4 years,
Tcl/Tk 8.6 is coming soon, so I think it may be the time to deprecate
Tcl/Tk 8.4 f
Enrico Weigelt, 2011-12-30 06:21+0100:
> Which packages ship files in /var ?
Many install directories there. And one of my packages, dokuwiki, also
installs files under /var/lib/dokuwiki/lib/{plugins,tpl}. These files
define the default set of bundled plugins and templates, and I install
them ther
Hi,
(if unsure please CC me on replies, I'm not subscribed to -legal)
due to demand by a coworker I've taken #625611 and started to prepare
a package for the exFAT fuse driver and the utils package.
Currently I hesitate to upload it and place the package on Debian
infrastructure (as in moving it
41 matches
Mail list logo
