Good Day
How are you today? I just want to introduce you to a job if you don't mind.
*Simply , You will Receive Instant Money Transactions through Bank direct
transfers from our customers in Australia.
*You can easily withdraw the money at the bank or ATM.
*You will keep Up to 10% of the total
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:20:16 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Note that I am starting from scratch. I know how to use pbuilder and
> how to manually download and build a package. At my present rate of
> 1-2 per week, it would take me several years to rebuild them all
> locally.
>
> Are there sc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Harlan Lieberman-Berg"
* Package name: libtext-ngram-perl
Version : 0.13
Upstream Author : Alberto Simões
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Ngram/
* License : GPL-1+ or Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl and XS
OMG !! No wonder and sorry !!
Yes I clicked "reply" only pop open the window ... not realizing anyone uses [X]-UID checking
anymore (ms mailers used to ignore it, ISPs here demanded to serve all mail w/ms servers, ...)
I was "mis-instructed" by another and didn't see that in the manual either
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:32:58PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > If we want to improve fsck time then the best thing to do would be
> > to consider a different default value for the -i option of mke2fs.
This advice is not applicable for ext4, since it will not read unused
portions of the
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:38:11PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:13:29PM +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> > Simon McVittie writes:
> >
> > > life's too short to spend time booting in single-user mode and
> > > resizing LVs.
> >
> > That's probably why we now hav
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:20:16AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > > It would be quite helpful to do a rebuild of the 237 boost reverse
> > > dependencies. Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Carl-Valentin,
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 03:58:45PM +0100, Carl-Valentin Schmitt wrote:
> Hello Debianers !
> somebody in German Debian-mailinglist said, that most recent bugs of
> recent months,
> looks as if there is a failure in glibc resp. in libc.
> He said that it seems to be a byte-wise
Hi,
John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell (27/12/2011):
> what's the deal?
yeah, what's the deal? Please stop hijacking threads for random
babbling.
Thank you already.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Ma, 27 dec 11, 13:45:25, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell wrote:
> what's the deal?
You should not hijack a thread, since it minimizes the chances to get
useful answers, as you post will be hidden among others
I would advise to post such questions to the debian-user list,
debian-devel is
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 06:32:16PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 10:52 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Will 1.46 be around long enough that reverting to 1.46 is an option there?
> >
> > Absolutely, 1.4
what's the deal?
grub2 won't install on an HD (one newer pc yes, 2 others no)
grub-rescue doesn't work without "xorisso" (i don't mkisofs scripts anymore, no
CD drive thanks)
I want grub2 on floopy. where are debian's instructions or FAQ for it please?
I see allot of internet questions onlin
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 08:53:10AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 26 décembre 2011 à 17:08 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > If someone would give even *one* example where something legitimately needed
> > by a udev rule could not be moved from /usr to / without breaking interfaces
>
Hi,
Am Montag, den 26.12.2011, 07:12 +0100 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Joachim Breitner (05/08/2011):
> > sounds very interesting. But I wonder if the name could be a bit more
> > specific, like opengl-trace or graphics-api-trace, as it does not seem
> > to trace arbitrary APIs.
>
> Currently I s
On Tue, 2011-12-27 at 10:52 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Will 1.46 be around long enough that reverting to 1.46 is an option there?
>
> Absolutely, 1.46 is an option. That's why I suggested it. Debian has
> been releasing wi
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > It would be quite helpful to do a rebuild of the 237 boost reverse
> > dependencies. Lucas Nussbaum seems to be able to do this: can you run
> > a rebuild with updated boost-d
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Thomas Krennwallner wrote:
> As long as something depends on 1.46, I assume that it should be
> around. The current situation is sub-optimal, because almost everything
> depends on the non-versioned boost libs of boost-defaults, despite
> boost's tendency
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I'd like to point out that any resulting build failures are quite easy
> > to fix: either
> > (a) contact package upstream for boost 1.48 changes; or
>
> It is? #652681 doesn't look like it.
I'll just note that an Inte
On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The latest Boost (1.48) is now in testing, and I'd like to switch the
> defaults. My first plan was to simply announce the switch then make
> it. I did so and got an immediate email from the release team
> asking to revert the defa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Richard Hartmann
* Package name: vcsh
Version : 0.20111226
Upstream Author : Richard Hartmann
* URL : https://github.com/RichiH/vcsh
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: POSIX Shell
Description : manage config files
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 02:37:26PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Adam Borowski writes:
> >> And things may change yet again in the future. With Btrfs, one can
> >> have a single filesystem with multiple subvolumes. The subvolumes
> >> can be mounted independently, and also snapshotted independentl
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 08:54:29AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 27 décembre 2011 à 08:53 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
Le lundi 26 décembre 2011 à 17:08 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> If someone would give even *one* example where something legitimately needed
> by a udev rule
Hi!
On Tue Dec 27, 2011 10:42:07AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > I'd like to point out that any resulting build failures are quite easy
> > to fix: either
> > (a) contact package upstream for boost 1.48 changes; or
>
> It is? #652681 doesn't look like it.
> Will 1.46 be around long enough th
Hi,
> I'd like to point out that any resulting build failures are quite easy
> to fix: either
> (a) contact package upstream for boost 1.48 changes; or
It is? #652681 doesn't look like it.
Will 1.46 be around long enough that reverting to 1.46 is an option there?
The wheezy release should be wi
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 08:35:06AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Andrey Rahmatullin [111227 07:53]:
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 06:59:07PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > > > It is a good thing to run with minimum privs, but compiling a new
> > > > kernel to
> > > > support this seems to
25 matches
Mail list logo
