Quoting Bernd Zeimetz (be...@bzed.de):
> It should as it means that it will be a PITA to find patches which were
> applied
> in Ubuntu and should be applied in Debian, too - or it means that we'll just
> recreate the same patches as they are hidden somewhere in the mess Ubuntu made
> without talk
On 12/03/2011 06:03 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> At the same time, I've been glad that particular user didn't conclude
> that Debian sucks at maintaining packages just because the maintainer of
> $foo did. Surely, I wouldn't have spent my time explaining to him what
> was going on and how he co
Hello,
we are seeing an increasing number of users in #debian-next asking about FTBFS
bugs that are reported by apt-listbugs during upgrades. Most of those users
are not familiar with acronyms such as FTBFS or if these bugs apply to their
setup.
The underlying problem seems to be that a subset of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Forensics
* Package name: libbfio
Version : 20111031
Upstream Author : Name
* URL : http://libbfio.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL-3
Programming Lang: C
Description : basic file input/output abstraction
On 12/03/2011 09:52 PM, Daniel Martí wrote:
> Scam in french, asking for money. Is there any way to avoid spam in this
> list?
For starters, by not including a fullquote of the SPAM. Then by
following http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.html#ads
Cheers, Andreas
signature.asc
Description:
Scam in french, asking for money. Is there any way to avoid spam in this list?
Nadia Dubois wrote:
>Bonjour
>
>N'ayez aucune crainte, car avant de vous contacter j'ai prié pendant
>plusieurs nuits pour que le seigneur Jésus Christ puisse m'accorder le
>contact d'une personne de confiance à qui
Bonjour
N'ayez aucune crainte, car avant de vous contacter j'ai prié pendant plusieurs
nuits pour que le seigneur Jésus Christ puisse m'accorder le contact d'une
personne de confiance à qui je pourrai
confier cette affaire et c'est à la suite de cela que je vous contact.
Je tiens aussi dans
On 2011-12-03, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:58:55 + (UTC), Philipp Kern
> wrote:
>>On 2011-12-02, Marc Haber wrote:
>>> I also support this and think it is a really good idea. But please
>>> keep x.y.z-1 around and easily accessible when x.y.z is released.
>>You can jigdo any old
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 03:59:18 +0800, pei deng
wrote:
>I think debian should release a publish version with roll updating as
>archlinux. and remove testing and sid version.
Kindly try to understand how Debian's release process works before
suggesting things.
Greetings
Marc
--
On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:21:34 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
wrote:
>Philipp Kern writes:
>> On 2011-12-02, Marc Haber wrote:
>>> I also support this and think it is a really good idea. But please
>>> keep x.y.z-1 around and easily accessible when x.y.z is released.
>>
>> You can jigdo any old CD im
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:58:55 + (UTC), Philipp Kern
wrote:
>On 2011-12-02, Marc Haber wrote:
>> I also support this and think it is a really good idea. But please
>> keep x.y.z-1 around and easily accessible when x.y.z is released.
>
>You can jigdo any old CD image.
How do I do this for a past
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 05:38:24PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Exactly that is the kind of bullshit why a lot of Debian people hate
> what Ubuntu does.
At a conference once happened to me that, after the official question
time, a Debian user approached me and told me something along the lines:
"
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Exactly that is the kind of bullshit why a lot of
> Debian people hate what Ubuntu does. Thanks for wasting your and our time
> instead of just talking to the people who maintain a package you want to
> change.
I don't see how I'm wasting y
On 12/03/2011 05:33 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> - Ubuntu splitted the package and applied various changes without getting in
>> contact with their Debian upstream about it. I'm not willing to try to figure
>> out what they did and wh
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> - Ubuntu splitted the package and applied various changes without getting in
> contact with their Debian upstream about it. I'm not willing to try to figure
> out what they did and why and if it makes sense.
>From a quick look at the package,
Sent from my iPhone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/f038803b-e96c-4f20-9bdf-18f3ad71e...@yahoo.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi
* Package name: mysql-connector-python
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Geert Vanderkelen
* URL : http://launchpad.net/myconnpy
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Pure Python im
Hi,
as empathy, webkit and emerillon build-depend on geoclue these days, I thought
its time to write something about it on d-devel instead of just orphaning it ;)
We are facing several issues with geoclue:
- upstream is more or less dead.The only commits I see in their git are bugfixes
for major
2011/12/2 Игорь Пашев :
> +1. Also there is no much difference between unstable and testing.
>
>
> 2011/12/3 Mike Dupont
>>
>> so what is the difference, I am using unstable and it rolls
>> mike
>>
Testing/Unstable/Experimental are kind-of rolling - it is rolling two
months after release and
2011/12/2 pei deng :
> I think debian should release a publish version with roll updating as
> archlinux. and remove testing and sid version.
>
> because 'roll' is really a very good mechanism for software publish and
> test.
>
And how would then Debian continue releasing stable? Debian is
especi
20 matches
Mail list logo
