Re: armhf and s390x

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: > Do we have porterboxes for these new architectures? http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=harris For s390x, according to the archive qualification page, there will be a chroot on zelenka: http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/s390x ht

Re: armhf and s390x

2011-11-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:14:59PM +, Mark Hymers wrote: > Hi, > > Earlier today, two new architectures had their base systems bootstrapped > into unstable. These new architectures are armhf and s390x. > > armhf went onto the mirrors with the 1952 dinstall mirror pulse and > s390x will follo

Re: daily build 24/11/11

2011-11-24 Thread Richard
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:07:26 +0100 (CET) Martin Bagge / brother wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Richard wrote: > > > I noticed that it was unable to find a network and obtain an address with > > dhcp. > > > > the build on 20/11/11 was OK > > Either you do proper bug reports or you stop sending t

Re: The mingw* mess in Debian

2011-11-24 Thread Stephen Kitt
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:17:32 +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > > 32-bit packages (lots of people don't realise mingw-w64 targets 32-bit > > Windows too; it seems the package description isn't sufficient). > > Yes, the package descriptions might need some improvement. This is how > mingw-w64 intro

Work-needing packages report for Nov 25, 2011

2011-11-24 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 390 (new: 1) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 140 (new: 0) Total number of packages request

Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

2011-11-24 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:48:08PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i486/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: cpuid > /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i486/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: rdtsc I should probably drop that i486 variant anyway, since i486 is already the default. I should also consider dropping the

Re: daily build 24/11/11

2011-11-24 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Richard wrote: I noticed that it was unable to find a network and obtain an address with dhcp. the build on 20/11/11 was OK Either you do proper bug reports or you stop sending these things to debian-devel@. The proper bug reports you are planning to do; do not send them

Re: Re: Want to become a DM and co-maintainer

2011-11-24 Thread Svante Signell
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 22:55 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Thu 24 Nov 2011 22:31:25 +0100, a écrit : > > > If you want to join, create an account on alioth and request to join the > > > group. > > > > Thank you for your reply. How can I obtain an alioth account? Are these > > o

Re: Re: Want to become a DM and co-maintainer

2011-11-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Thu 24 Nov 2011 23:27:00 +0100, a écrit : > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 22:55 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Thu 24 Nov 2011 22:31:25 +0100, a écrit : > > > > If you want to join, create an account on alioth and request to join the > > > > group. > > > > > > Than

Re: Re: Want to become a DM and co-maintainer

2011-11-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Thu 24 Nov 2011 22:31:25 +0100, a écrit : > > If you want to join, create an account on alioth and request to join the > > group. > > Thank you for your reply. How can I obtain an alioth account? Are these > only available for DMs, or for wannabes too? See alioth.debian.org: an

Re: Re: Want to become a DM and co-maintainer

2011-11-24 Thread Svante Signell
Replying to the list archive mail, since I'm currently not subscribed to debian-devel. > From: Thomas Weber > Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 21:43:40 +0100 > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 08:54:24PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > Where/how to apply to become a co-maintainer and a maintainer? The > > package

users and groups

2011-11-24 Thread Richard
Hi please ignore my previous mail. It wasn't where or what I expected, but logical once located. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth -- Best wishes / 73 Richard Bown e-mail: rich...@g8jvm.com or richard.b...@blueyonder.co.uk nil carborundum a illegitemis

users& groups

2011-11-24 Thread Richard
Hi the app users & groups is missing on the daily build 20/11/11, is this to added later ? I can always grab it from squeeze if needed. thanks -- Best wishes / 73 Richard Bown e-mail: rich...@g8jvm.com or richard.b...@blueyonder.co.uk nil carborundum a illegitemis #

daily build 24/11/11

2011-11-24 Thread Richard
Hi I noticed that it was unable to find a network and obtain an address with dhcp. the build on 20/11/11 was OK -- Best wishes / 73 Richard Bown e-mail: rich...@g8jvm.com or richard.b...@blueyonder.co.uk nil carborundum a illegitemis #

Bug#649903: ITP: php-xml-beautifier -- Beautify XML code and make it easier to read

2011-11-24 Thread Mathias Ertl
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mathias Ertl * Package name: php-xml-beautifier Version : 1.2.2 Upstream Author : Chuck Burgess * URL : http://pear.php.net/package/XML_Beautifier * License : BSD Programming Lang: PHP Description : Beautify XML

Bug#649897: ITP: horizon -- OpenStack Dashboard

2011-11-24 Thread Julien Danjou
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Julien Danjou * Package name: horizon Version : 2012.1~e1 Upstream Author : 2011 OpenStack, LLC. * URL : http://launchpad.net/horizon * License : Apache-2 Programming Lang: Python Description : OpenStack Dashboard

Re: Re: The mingw* mess in Debian

2011-11-24 Thread Fabian Greffrath
gcc-mingw32 is no longer a build-dependency of any package in Debian so I'll probably dispose of it with the next gcc-mingw-w64 upload (which will include a transition package). That's great news! I was thinking more along the lines of mingw-w64-win32 and mingw-w64-win64 so that the API names

Re: Re: The mingw* mess in Debian

2011-11-24 Thread Fabian Greffrath
gcc-mingw32 is no longer a build-dependency of any package in Debian so I'll probably dispose of it with the next gcc-mingw-w64 upload (which will include a transition package). That's great news! I was thinking more along the lines of mingw-w64-win32 and mingw-w64-win64 so that the API names