Re: Towards multi-arch: "Multi-Arch: same" file conflicts

2011-11-18 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Jakub Wilk] > The most common reasons for cross-architecture differences appear to > be (in random order): > - Compiling GNU message catalogs with gettext, which uses native > endianness (see bug #468209). Having read that bug log, it's not clear to me whether there's a consensus about what to

Re: Perl transition blockers: candidates for testing removal

2011-11-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 20:52:48 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > * genders (#646286): patch ready, maybe NMU? > > Uploaded in the meantime. > Uploaded, but still broken. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Re: Perl transition blockers: candidates for testing removal

2011-11-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:25:16 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing > removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed: > * libdbd-interbase-perl (#648857) Just asked for removal from the archive. > * prima (#628500) Already NMUd, s

Re: Distribution and support for Debian-502-i386-netinst

2011-11-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 05:59:59PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:43:32 +, "Adam D. Barratt" > wrote: > >but > >the kernel team have been very good in the past about fixing such things > >once they're aware of them. > > Why does the kernel team get an execption that is unan

Re: Perl transition blockers: candidates for testing removal

2011-11-18 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Luk Claes wrote: > The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing > removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed: > ... > * nginx (#649061) > ... This doesn't look like Perl issue, but I'm uploading new version that should fix build

Re: Perl transition blockers: candidates for testing removal

2011-11-18 Thread tony mancill
On 11/18/2011 09:25 AM, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing > removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed: > > ... > > * genders (#646286): patch ready, maybe NMU? Working on an upload of genders now. Sorry, for some reason I

Re: Distribution and support for Debian-502-i386-netinst

2011-11-18 Thread Steve McIntyre
Marc Haber wrote: >On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:26:33 +, Ben Hutchings > wrote: >> >>I can't imagine why you would expect this to work. > >I wouldn't. The site was just surprised by the point release and did >notice the deployment failure well before the announcement of the >point release was receiv

Re: Bug#629255: Perl transition blockers: candidates for testing removal

2011-11-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 06:25:16PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing > removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed: > * ifeffit (#648839) > * uwsgi (#640347) > * libdbd-interbase-perl (#648857) > * libcrypt-gcrypt-perl (#634598

Perl transition blockers: candidates for testing removal

2011-11-18 Thread Luk Claes
Hi The following packages block the perl transition and will become testing removal candidates soon unless the bugs get fixed: * ifeffit (#648839) * uwsgi (#640347) * libdbd-interbase-perl (#648857) * libcrypt-gcrypt-perl (#634598) * prima (#628500) * nginx (#649061) * libsignatures-perl (#636132

Re: Distribution and support for Debian-502-i386-netinst

2011-11-18 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:43:32 +, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: >but >the kernel team have been very good in the past about fixing such things >once they're aware of them. Why does the kernel team get an execption that is unanonimously denied to other, much less important parts of the distribution?

Re: Distribution and support for Debian-502-i386-netinst

2011-11-18 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:26:33 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: >On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:08:17PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:00:26 +0100, Adam Borowski >> wrote: >> >For example: you download the current point release, burn it to a CD >> >preparing to install a bunch of servers

Re: Distribution and support for Debian-502-i386-netinst

2011-11-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ben Hutchings writes: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:08:17PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:00:26 +0100, Adam Borowski >> wrote: >> >For example: you download the current point release, burn it to a CD >> >preparing to install a bunch of servers the next day... then suddenly >

Re: Using Qt debug libraries without configure and qmake

2011-11-18 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:12:33 + Philip Ashmore wrote: > On 18/11/11 00:07, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:01:42 + > > Philip Ashmore wrote: > > > >> , presuming they are even installed or the user downloaded (the matching > >> version of) them. > > apt-get source - it alw

Re: Using Qt debug libraries without configure and qmake

2011-11-18 Thread Philip Ashmore
On 18/11/11 00:07, Neil Williams wrote: On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:01:42 + Philip Ashmore wrote: On 17/11/11 14:56, Neil Williams wrote: The path doesn't matter that much, as long as the debugger can find a filename which at least matches the end of the path. i.e. work backwards and use the b