Re: directory under /usr/bin -- Ok or not?

2011-11-04 Thread Miles Bader
Ben Hutchings writes: >> I don’t think Debian requests FHS to document something before we can >> use it. The real problem with the bizarre GNU invention that >> is /usr/libexec is that nobody knows what it is here for. > > It's not a GNU invention; I believe it derives from BSD. Yes, it original

Re: can somebody update wwwoffle

2011-11-04 Thread jidanni
[ http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/166498/ ] > "NW" == Neil Williams writes: NW> CC'ing the maintainer but if there's no interest in, say, a week, I'll NW> file for removal instead, RoQA, RC-buggy, low popcon, cruft. OK, I guess it must end this way. OK, thanks. --

Simplifying bootstrap on circular-dependent packages

2011-11-04 Thread Daniel Ruoso
I have been thinking about the bootstrapping of pakages lately. I am involved in bootstrapping a partial system -- no kernel and no libc -- for some architectures for internal use. And I just thought that we could use one trick to help in the bootstrap of packages that depend on other shared librar

Re: directory under /usr/bin -- Ok or not?

2011-11-04 Thread Clint Adams
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:46:20PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > I don’t think Debian requests FHS to document something before we can > use it. The real problem with the bizarre GNU invention that > is /usr/libexec is that nobody knows what it is here for. Allegedly it was going to be in the F

Re: directory under /usr/bin -- Ok or not?

2011-11-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:46:20PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 04 novembre 2011 à 21:00 +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen a > écrit : > > So, being halfway serious: Debian wants FHS to document it before we can > > use it, and the FHS wants to document current practice. Clearly, we ne

Re: Possible mass bug filling for package depending on "menu".

2011-11-04 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 10:21 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:13:43AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > Other package that depend on menu... mostly meta package > > === > > +---+---++

Re: directory under /usr/bin -- Ok or not?

2011-11-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 04 novembre 2011 à 21:00 +0100, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen a écrit : > So, being halfway serious: Debian wants FHS to document it before we can > use it, and the FHS wants to document current practice. Clearly, we need > someone in the Fedora project to start using /usr/libexec first. :)

Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome

2011-11-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 04 novembre 2011 à 18:17 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit : > Nevertheless,.. why cant you make the metapackages to make more use of > recommends instead of depends. Because doing so is like ensuring there will be some systems that don’t work correctly, wasting our time on bug

Re: directory under /usr/bin -- Ok or not?

2011-11-04 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Igor Pashev writes: > Isn't /usr/libexec for "internal use" exetutables? Other places, yes. Not in the FHS. So, being halfway serious: Debian wants FHS to document it before we can use it, and the FHS wants to document current practice. Clearly, we need someone in the Fedora project to start us

Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome

2011-11-04 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Christoph Anton Mitterer | I've also had/have several times problems with those meta pacakges | forcing me to install stuff I don't like (or I consider even unsecure). | | NM is surely an example of this (just grep CVE in the changelog). One CVE in the seven years it's been in the archive?

Bug#647640: ITP: bibledit-web -- Online Bible translation tool

2011-11-04 Thread Teus Benschop (No specific comment)
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Teus Benschop" * Package name: bibledit-web Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : Teus Benschop * URL : http://bibledit.org/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: PHP Description : Online Bible translation tool This too

Bug#647639: ITP: libblocxx -- BloCXX--C++ Framework for Application Development

2011-11-04 Thread Björn Esser
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Björn Esser" * Package name: libblocxx Version : 2.2.0+svn536 Upstream Author : Kevin Harris * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/blocxx/ * License : BSD-3 Programming Lang: C++ Description : BloCXX--C++ Fra

Bug#647633: ITP: lein-clojars -- Leiningen plugin for interacting with Clojars.org

2011-11-04 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mathieu Malaterre * Package name: lein-clojars Version : 0.7.0 Upstream Author : Alex Osborne * URL : https://github.com/ato/lein-clojars * License : Programming Lang: Java Description : Leiningen plugin for int

Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome

2011-11-04 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi. I've also had/have several times problems with those meta pacakges forcing me to install stuff I don't like (or I consider even unsecure). NM is surely an example of this (just grep CVE in the changelog). Another one is gnome-bluetooth... there are so many systems which don't have bluetooth

Re: How to find a sponsor?

2011-11-04 Thread Björn Esser
Thanks a lot! 2011/11/4 Josue Abarca : > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:57:00PM +0100, Björn Esser wrote: >> Hello there! >> >> My name is Björn Esser and I'm from near Hannover, Germany. I want to >> contribute to the debian project and so I am looking for a sponsor >> (preferred with German as nativ

Re: How to find a sponsor?

2011-11-04 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Björn, On 04.11.2011 15:57, Björn Esser wrote: I want to > contribute to the debian project and so I am looking for a sponsor > (preferred with German as native). I hope, I'm in the right place here > for asking. thank you for your interest in

Re: How to find a sponsor?

2011-11-04 Thread Josue Abarca
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:57:00PM +0100, Björn Esser wrote: > Hello there! > > My name is Björn Esser and I'm from near Hannover, Germany. I want to > contribute to the debian project and so I am looking for a sponsor > (preferred with German as native). I hope, I'm in the right place here > for

How to find a sponsor?

2011-11-04 Thread Björn Esser
Hello there! My name is Björn Esser and I'm from near Hannover, Germany. I want to contribute to the debian project and so I am looking for a sponsor (preferred with German as native). I hope, I'm in the right place here for asking. Best regards, Björn Esser Hallo zusammen! Mein Name ist

Bug#647611: ITP: keystone -- OpenStack cloud identity service

2011-11-04 Thread Julien Danjou
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Julien Danjou * Package name: keystone Version : 2011.3 Upstream Author : OpenStack Developers * URL : https://launchpad.net/keystone * License : Apache License 2.0 Programming Lang: Python Description : OpenStack

Sharing data between maintainer scripts and debian/rules

2011-11-04 Thread Neil Williams
We've a few native packages which handle data in package-specific directories under /var/lib/. It would be convenient to specify the name of this directory in debian/rules as a -D define to the compiler (because it's native) and then pass that into the relevant maintainer scripts, postinst and post

Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome

2011-11-04 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Josselin Mouette [03 18:53 +0100]: > Le jeudi 03 novembre 2011 à 15:26 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter a écrit : > > Hmm, does NM works if nis runs ? nis daemon has by default no > > time-out, starts before NM provides a network and locks the machine > > lng time 'til root can become access t

Re: Re: Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome

2011-11-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Bernd Zeimetz wrote: And I believe that NM should not be something gnome should depend on as there are various other ways to configure your network. Imho it should Recommend network-manage | wicd-gtk | similar-tools-if-they-exist. Those packages do not provide the NetworkManager DBus interface

Re: can somebody update wwwoffle

2011-11-04 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:06:26 +0800 jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Can somebody update wwwoffle? Upstream has a new version that makes > HTTPS work once again. May be better to remove it. The bug you mention is severity important but there's an unfixed RC bug open since February. #615795. No maintai

Re: Possible mass bug filling for package depending on "menu".

2011-11-04 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:13:43AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > Other package that depend on menu... mostly meta package > === > +---+---+++ > |Package name |provide| su in | Dependency

Re: Possible mass bug filling for package depending on "menu".

2011-11-04 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 07:20 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Bill Allombert (bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr): > > > > What about moving the su-to-root binary to a different binary package ? > > > Bill what's your PoV about spliting it ? > > In that case, I think that the above discus