Processed: reassign 646310 to linux-2.6

2011-10-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 646310 linux-2.6 Bug #646310 [general] general: mouse stops working Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'linux-2.6'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 646310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Bug#646310: general: mouse stops working

2011-10-22 Thread Mark Grieveson
Package: general Severity: normal My mouse freezes. From dmesg, I get the following: [ 1570.225856] psmouse.c: bad data from KBC - timeout [ 1629.312170] psmouse.c: Mouse at isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 1 bytes away. I don't know what is behind this, so I have made a gene

Bug#646309: ITP: openastro.org -- Open Source Astrology

2011-10-22 Thread Paul Elliott
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul Elliott * Package name: openastro.org Version : 1.1.25 Upstream Author : Pelle van der Scheer * URL : http://www.example.org/ : https://launchpad.net/openastro.org * License : GPLV3 Programming

Bug#646308: ITP: openastro.org -- Open Source Astrology

2011-10-22 Thread Paul Elliott
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul Elliott * Package name: openastro.org Version : 1.1.25 Upstream Author : Pelle van der Scheer * URL : http://www.openastro.org/?Home : https://launchpad.net/openastro.org * License : GPLV3

Re: Coinstallability of Fortran libraries built with different compilers

2011-10-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Alastair, On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:28:00AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Cross-posting this to debian-devel for greater visibility on multiarch, > On 2011-10-20 17:30, Enrico Zini wrote: > >another issue caused by a lack of standards for Fortran .mod files is > >that one cannot use, say

Re: Do not blindly enable PIE [was: Bits from dpkg developers - dpkg 1.16.1]

2011-10-22 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >>   Two hardening features are not enabled by default: PIE and bindnow. >>   If your package supports PIE, you might want to consider enabling it. > > You should not blindly enable PIE, even if the package seems to support it.   > PIE > can ha

Do not blindly enable PIE [was: Bits from dpkg developers - dpkg 1.16.1]

2011-10-22 Thread Matthias Klose
> Two hardening features are not enabled by default: PIE and bindnow. > If your package supports PIE, you might want to consider enabling it. You should not blindly enable PIE, even if the package seems to support it. PIE can have runtime performance impacts up to 25% for some binaries on som

Bug#646255: ITP: gnome-online-accounts -- GNOME Online Accounts

2011-10-22 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Biebl * Package name: gnome-online-accounts Version : 3.2.1 Upstream Author : David Zeuthen * URL : https://live.gnome.org/OnlineAccounts * License : LGPL-2.1+ Programming Lang: C Description : GNOME Onli

Re: release goal proposal: enable hardening build flags

2011-10-22 Thread Andreas Metzler
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Kees Cook wrote: > I would like to propose a release goal of enabling hardening build flags[1] > for all C/C++ packages in the archive[2]. For Wheezy, specific sub-goals are > being chosen. [...] Hello, Is there any point in still using hardening-wrapper if a p

Bug#646208: RFH: apache2 -- Apache HTTP Server

2011-10-22 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I am looking for co-maintainers for the apache2 package. The other co-maintainers are inactive. The package is not in a bad shape, but I am lacking time and there is significant work to be done in the near future. The new co-maintainer(s) should of course have