Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 643712 gnome
Bug #643712 [general] general: GNOME or GTK tabs are very slow
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gnome'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
643712: http://bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
* Package name: ocaml-zarith
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Xavier Leroy and Antoine Mine
* Url : https://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/zarith/
* License : LGPL 2 with special linking exception
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Jumper
* Package name: guacamole
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Michael Jumper
* URL : http://guacamole.sourceforge.net/
* License : AGPL-3
Programming Lang: Java
Description : HTML5 web appi to access
Le Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:01:54PM -0700, Kees Cook a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 08:17:54AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Two hardening features are not enabled by default: PIE and bindnow.
> > If your package supports PIE, you might want to consider enabling it.
> > If the binarie
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:52:15PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:01:54PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Just to be explicit, PIE tends to have small (<1%) performance hits on
> > register-starved architectures (i386) in most cases, for for certain work
> > loads (e.g. python)
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
For the last two days any GNOME or GTK program that I run that has tabs (e.g.
gedit, nautilus, Iceweasel etc) have become very slow to open new tabs, switch
between tabs or close tabs. Nautilus and Iceweasel work with no slow down at
all as lo
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:01:54PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Just to be explicit, PIE tends to have small (<1%) performance hits on
> register-starved architectures (i386) in most cases, for for certain work
> loads (e.g. python) the hit is large (~15%). On architectures with plenty
> of registers
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:00:11AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > How expensive is this? Is archive/unarchive just a flag to prevent
> > spam from getting entered into the bug report, or something more?
>
> It's mainly just a link/unlink with some inde
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> There are a bunch of bug reports where a bug was fixed in the stable
> branch, and for whatever reason it wasn't obvious to BTS that the
> bug was fixed in the development branch as well, so it shows a
> picture like this:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Hi there,
There are a bunch of bug reports where a bug was fixed in the stable
branch, and for whatever reason it wasn't obvious to BTS that the bug
was fixed in the development branch as well, so it shows a picture like
this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/version.cgi?info=1;absolute=0;fixed=e2f
Le vendredi, 9 septembre 2011 09.21:20, Luca Capello a écrit :
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:36:17 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> > The main reference to build up this list has been
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Smartphone, which is still a good reference! Now
> > to the list.
>
> What about [1]? There is
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
Le jeudi, 8 septembre 2011 16.32:45, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> I applaud this "merge" effort. Kudos!
>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:36:17AM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> > c) Create a new Alioth project, 'mobile-ux', with associated
> > mailing-list
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 at 16:38:11 +0200, Laszlo Kajan wrote:
> Without the funding received based on the usage statistics you contribute by
> installing this package none of the packages on Debian could have been made
> available to you at no cost.
I'm pretty sure that's not true. None of the Predic
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 at 13:01:45 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> * The package then has fewer dependencies
> * ... and can then be installed on a system without bash.
This doesn't help Debian directly, but it may help upstreams to be portable
to operating systems with a reason to use a non-bash shell -
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laszlo Kajan
* Package name: pp-popularity-contest
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Laszlo Kajan
* URL : http://www.rostlab.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : PredictProtein popularity con
Thomas Hood writes ("Eliminating bash scripts?"):
> Recently I noticed some bug reports asking that scripts be
> rewritten to run on (POSIX) sh. These weren't the familiar
> (and completely justified) complaints about bashisms in scripts
> shebanged #!/bin/sh. These were requests to rewrite #!/bin
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:01:45 +0200
Thomas Hood wrote:
> * The package then has fewer dependencies
> * ... and can then be installed on a system without bash.
Unless the package is doing a lot of clever stuff in shell (at which
point it is possibly worth asking if the package should use a faster
Recently I noticed some bug reports asking that scripts be
rewritten to run on (POSIX) sh. These weren't the familiar
(and completely justified) complaints about bashisms in scripts
shebanged #!/bin/sh. These were requests to rewrite #!/bin/bash
scripts as #!/bin/sh scripts. Why do this? The fol
* Ian Jackson [110927 20:21]:
> Bernhard R. Link writes ("Re: Bits from dpkg developers - dpkg 1.16.1"):
> > CFLAGS and LDFLAGS (and CPPFLAGS and so on) are in my opionion normal
> > things to be in a users environment, so a package's rules file should
> > in my eyes not depend on them not being s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laszlo Kajan
* Package name: librg-utils-perl
Version : 1.0.41
Upstream Author : Burkhard Rost
* URL : http://www.rostlab.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : parsers and format conversion u
20 matches
Mail list logo
