Hi Lucas,
On 28 July 2011 04:08, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> ...
> What would help:
> - subscribe to systemtap email notifications on the PTS
> (http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/systemtap.html, see little box on the
> bottom left corner) and contribute to the bug mail when you receive
> some
> - g
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 635157 general
Bug #635157 [na] Package: NA - wishlist bug
Warning: Unknown package 'na'
Bug reassigned from package 'na' to 'general'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions NA.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 635756 general
Bug #635756 [unknown] unknown: Improved useability for ExpressCard to
CompactFlash adaptors
Warning: Unknown package 'unknown'
Bug reassigned from package 'unknown' to 'general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
awesome and timely thread -- yet to read it in full -- and shame I am
not at debconf atm.
For our NeuroDebian project we have been providing exactly that
for slightly more than a year:
virtual appliance image (since Virtualbox 4.x it is just a single file,
.ova, which is a tar archive of the .o
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 04:33:33PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> anyhow.. i'll get back to you about that later.
Actually, no point in asking me about it: now, months later, I have
no idea anymore what I did, except trying the obvious things based on
trying to decipher the manual pages. Sorry I'm
¡Hola
Elogios del día para usted,
Por favor, no tengas miedo a la recepción de este correo electrónico que tengo
que mantener una baja
perfil con respecto a este importante tema que quiero discutir con usted.
Hay una cartera financiera de la empresa con la que trabajo que yo
realmente me gusta
On 07/28/2011 04:36 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
> For a while I've thought that it would be good to have a way of
> provoking such packages to reset themselves
absolutely, see the other thread on devel from before:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/07/msg00698.html
--
Address:Daniel
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 04:12:44 +, The Fungi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:41:07AM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> > AIUI, the .postinst scripts may be re-executed with
> > dpkg-reconfigure(8).
> [...]
>
> In fact, for years I've relied on precisely this behavior to
> regenerate SSH host keys
On 07/28/2011 03:51 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> i appologize for having forgotten to fill the bug (to keep the reminder
> about it) myself after you've choosen not to (which is not your
> obligation, so perfectly fine).
jftr: virtual-hdd is as of now in man lb_config listed as binary image type.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:12:02 +0100
Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:48:57AM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
> > It seems bizarre to me that we require packages to build
> > using software in main to be 'debian', but we wouldn't
> > require it for images distributed as being 'debian'.
>
>
On 07/28/2011 12:45 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Sorry, if you did, I must not have understood what you said. That seems
> to be a continuing trend between myself and live-build.
citing from #debian-devel:
---snip---
[...]
2010-11-28 13:20:53 < dba> liw: live-build supports that already now.
2010-
Hi,
It seems that many different teams have recently switched to Git, or are
considering switching. But each of them seems to re-implement the wheel
by designing their own Git workflow.
I think that it would be fantastic if we could collaborate on defining
a common Git workflow.
Pros:
- build on
Package: wnpp
Owner: Youhei SASAKI
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ruby-twitter-oauth
Version : 0.4.3
Upstream Author : Richard Taylor
* URL or Web page : https://rubygems.org/gems/twitter_oauth
* License : MIT
Description : Ruby Client for Twitter API using OAuth
Package: wnpp
Owner: Youhei SASAKI
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ruby-simple-oauth
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Author : Steve Richert, Erik Michaels-Ober
* URL or Web page : http://github.com/laserlemon/simple_oauth
* License : MIT
Description : Simply builds and v
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:05 +0200, Philipp Hagemeister wrote:
> Jon Dowland wrote:
> > The VM definition file is trickier. qemu/kvm essentially don't have
> one; you
> > would supply command-line arguments to the tool.
> virsh/libvirt/virt-manager et
> > al sitting on top of KVM have an XML defini
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:28:30PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> exactly. i told you this when you asked about it when you were looking
> into it, and also after you've come up with vmdebootstrap.
Sorry, if you did, I must not have understood what you said. That seems
to be a continuing trend bet
On 07/28/2011 12:07 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> (No idea if the code
> actually supports it or not.)
it does.
> Having to hunt for this information is annoying (but seems
> typical for live-build documentation)
lacking manpower.. you know.. so we try to focus making the most used
features be pro
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 21:07 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Vincent Bernat schrieb:
> > --=-=-=
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > OoO En cette matin=C3=A9e ensoleill=C3=A9e du mardi 26 juillet 2011, vers=
> > 09:28,
> > Lucas N
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:45:30AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 10:34 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Where is that documented?
>
> man lb_config and look for -b virtual-hdd in connection with
> --virtual-*. if you build with --initramfs none, you'll get a non-live
> image, if you bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 635685 libc6-dev
Bug #635685 [general] general: gcc -m32 has no access to system-specific
includes in multiarch world
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'libc6-dev'.
> severity 635685 serious
Bug #635685 [libc6-dev] general: gcc -m
reassign 635685 libc6-dev
severity 635685 serious
thanks
On 2011-07-28 10:58 +0200, Tim Northover wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: normal
>
> It looks like "gcc -m32" has been partially broken by the recent
> hiving off of various headers to /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu.
>
> In particular a
Package: general
Severity: normal
It looks like "gcc -m32" has been partially broken by the recent
hiving off of various headers to /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu.
In particular a program consisting of the single line "#include
" fails with the error:
In file included from tmp.c:1:0:
/usr/include
On 07/28/2011 10:34 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Where is that documented?
man lb_config and look for -b virtual-hdd in connection with
--virtual-*. if you build with --initramfs none, you'll get a non-live
image, if you build with --initramfs live-boot (default), you'll get a
live image.
--
Addr
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:28:04AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/28/2011 10:21 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Last I looked, live-build built read-only images,
>
> that's not true, the fs images (!= iso, != usb-hdd) are always RW[0].
> linaro used that functionality in lb some years ago alre
On 07/28/2011 10:21 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Last I looked, live-build built read-only images,
that's not true, the fs images (!= iso, != usb-hdd) are always RW[0].
linaro used that functionality in lb some years ago already.
[0] not your fault for not seeing it, it's rather confusing since th
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:13:07AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 09:18 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > I've never used Debian Live. Would a Vbox of Debian Live in installed
> > mode be any different to an installed standard Debian?
>
> like i said, live-build can build images that
On 07/27/2011 05:41 AM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Given how a usual .postinst script is written, its repeated
> execution isn't expected to do any harm.
for the -live case, this just bloads boottime unnecessarily long (which
is why live-config doesn't do that).
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Don
Zitat von Steffen Moeller :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: libusb-java
Version : 0.8ztex20090101
* URL : http://libusbjava.sf.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : wrapper for C library libus
On 07/26/2011 09:18 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> I've never used Debian Live. Would a Vbox of Debian Live in installed
> mode be any different to an installed standard Debian?
like i said, live-build can build images that are 'live enabled' or not.
in the latter case, they are no different than
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:48:57AM +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
> It seems bizarre to me that we require packages to build
> using software in main to be 'debian', but we wouldn't
> require it for images distributed as being 'debian'.
What if DFSG tools to produce the proprietary formats were
availabl
30 matches
Mail list logo
