Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Egger
* Package name: unknown-horizons
Version : 2011.2
* URL : http://www.unknown-horizons.org/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : 2D realtime strategy simulation
Unknown Horizons i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Egger
* Package name: fife
Version : 0.3.2+svn3687
* URL : http://www.fifengine.de/
* License : LGPLv2.1 mostly
Programming Lang: C++ Python
Description : FIFE is a multi-platform isometric game engine
FI
===
CALL FOR PAPERS DATE 2012
TRACK D: "Design Methods and Tools"
TOPIC D1: "System Specifications, Models and Methodologies"
DESIGN AUTOMATION AND TEST IN EUROPE CONFER
Den 28. juni 2011 19:56, skrev Joachim Breitner:
> I tend to agree with Bernhard that it would be nice if it were made easy
> for the user (e.g. a user on amd64 who runs some application in wine and
> is surprised that the foo.local addresses stop working).
Actually, I think the current status quo
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 11:49:11AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> a major accessibility regression. I however believe corba can be used
> over TCP/IP,
I would be *very* surprised if that wasn't true -- CORBA was meant to be
used over TCP/IP, using it to localhost or over a unix domain socket is
j
Hey, how are you,
I'm Sundeep Kumar,
I have added you as my friend, I'm waiting for your acceptance and also I
want to introduce my new friends to you ...
Please click here to accept me as your friend :
http://www.bigmazaa.com/invite/signup?ref=103019&email=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&c
Hey, how are you,
I'm Sundeep Kumar,
I have added you as my friend, I'm waiting for your acceptance and also I
want to introduce my new friends to you ...
Please click here to accept me as your friend :
http://www.bigmazaa.com/invite/signup?ref=103019&email=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&c
Josselin Mouette, le Fri 01 Jul 2011 09:39:54 +0200, a écrit :
> but if we can get rid of at-spi and
> have GConf ported to D-Bus before the wheezy release, I’m not sure it’s
> worth an investigation.
For now, at-spi2 is very far from being as usable as at-spi, it would be
a major accessibility re
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 at 10:54:12 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> We used to have the ARM old-ABI architecture using mixed-endianness, but
> we don't have this architecture anymore (replaced by armel).
D-Bus interop for doubles was always broken on ARM old-ABI, then, and nobody
noticed :-(
The curre
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 09:23:33AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 at 10:06:34 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > Even dark corner like double endianess ?
>
> Doubles are byteswapped in exactly the same way as int64, I hope that's
> correct everywhere? (dbus/dbus-marshal-bytesw
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:48:39AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 29.06.2011 00:39, schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Am 28.06.2011 19:56, schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> >>> The only nss modules outside of eglibc that *are* available in biarch
> >>> today
> >>> are nss_ldap, nss_mdns*, nss_myhostname, an
Hi all,
I am contacting debian-devel as per policy, in order to make libc-bin
essential.
Currently libc-bin is virtually essential: a lot of essential packages
depend on libc6 which in turn depends on libc-bin. This package has been
created during the first steps of the multiarch transition two y
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:53:26AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> But for now, the resume is that we put it into the sysadmin’s hand to
> install nss packages for all architectures he thinks his users want to
> run binaries on?
Yes, that's the only option I see at present.
--
Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 at 09:39:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Before we start to work on some packages, I’d like to ask if someone has
>> checked whether D-Bus is multiarch-safe. Said otherwise, is it possible
>> to use a D-Bus interface
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 at 10:06:34 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Even dark corner like double endianess ?
Doubles are byteswapped in exactly the same way as int64, I hope that's
correct everywhere? (dbus/dbus-marshal-byteswap.c around line 73.)
To be more specific: D-Bus assumes that doubles are
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 at 09:01:04 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Foreign-endian messages are always *meant* to have worked
To clarify that a bit: messages can have either endianness, but libdbus
will deal with that transparently, and always give library users data in
native endianness (byteswapping
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 at 09:39:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Before we start to work on some packages, I’d like to ask if someone has
> checked whether D-Bus is multiarch-safe. Said otherwise, is it possible
> to use a D-Bus interface over another architecture?
D-Bus is machine-word-size-neutr
Le lundi 27 juin 2011 à 11:54 +0100, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> It is with excitement and trepidation that I write to you today about the
> status of multiarch support in Debian.
A big thank you to all of those who finally made this possible.
Before we start to work on some packages, I’d like to
18 matches
Mail list logo
