Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Hemanth HM
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ruby-debug
Version : 0.10.4
Upstream Author : Kent Sibilev
Rocky Bernstein
* URL : http://rubyforge.o
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
> Could the Debian obituaries start including the age, and cause of death
> please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obituary#Contents
−1. It's not the business of the Debian project to ask such questions of
the surviving family, nor to distribute that information without
Torsten Werner writes:
> Hi Arno,
>
> Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Arno Töll:
> > Now, what's exactly meant by primary UID? The primary GPG UID? If
> > yes, am I right when I assume signing a package with a non-primary
> > GPG UID or even more with a sub key won't work to fulfill DM upload
> >
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:28:07PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> In this sense, most reasonable solution seems to me
>
> 0.YYMMDD
>
> This way, when ever upstream decide to release package with sane
> versioning (usually bigger than 1.) within 8 chars and we can continue
> without epoch. But this
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh debian.org> writes:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> > Using date and time as a version is not current best practice. You'll still
> > need the upstream version part too to sort correctly relative to released
> > versions.
>
> I was refering to the full comm
Bastien ROUCARIES writes:
> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
Patches to WebAuth to support NSS are welcome, but I'm sure not going to
bother. Seems like a waste of time to me. If I were going to por
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Torsten,
On 26.04.2011 16:06, Torsten Werner wrote:
> the first UID with an email address is used by dak. It can be changed
> manually if there is a good reason for such a change. Please file a bug
> report against ftp.debian.org if you need such a
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 04:15:41AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Could the Debian obituaries start including the age, and cause of death
> please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obituary#Contents
Whatever information is given in obituaries has been put there on
request (or at least their ackno
Could the Debian obituaries start including the age, and cause of death
please. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obituary#Contents
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.deb
4. Build-Depends - Depends (aka invalid listing in Build-Depends)
http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB/InvalidBuild-Depends
Packages in list 4 should be fixed because it means either one of:
1. The Build-Depends listing is erroneous (f.e. upstream dropped
support for Berkeley DB)
2. The build p
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 26, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>
>> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
>> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
> While I believe it to be a worthwhile goal, I have serious doubts tha
On Apr 26, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
While I believe it to be a worthwhile goal, I have serious doubts that
we should actively switch packages to NSS when this causes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alastair McKinstry
* Package name: ccseapps
Version : 4.5
Upstream Author : Center for Computational Sciences and Engineering
* URL : http://ccse.lbl.gov/Software/index.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Descr
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-04-26, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
>> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
>
> Is there any progress on Fedora's effort? So far it seemed like
On 2011-04-26, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Arno Töll:
>> Now, what's exactly meant by primary UID? The primary GPG UID? If yes,
>> am I right when I assume signing a package with a non-primary GPG UID
>> or even more with a sub key won't work to fulfill DM upload rights
On 2011-04-26, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
> package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
Is there any progress on Fedora's effort? So far it seemed like Vaporware to
me. (Given that it's not exactly a Fedora featu
Hi Arno,
Am -10.01.-28163 20:59, schrieb Arno Töll:
> Now, what's exactly meant by primary UID? The primary GPG UID? If yes,
> am I right when I assume signing a package with a non-primary GPG UID
> or even more with a sub key won't work to fulfill DM upload rights?
the first UID with an email ad
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:07:11PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > On 26/04/2011 01:50, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > > Anyway - Summing up what I'm saying here, tags have a clear meaning: A
> > > point where upstream wants us to base our efforts
Este e-mail es solo para recordarte que el último evento exclusivo de
Postgrados y MBA en el exterior del año, será el próximo 4 de Mayo.
Inscríbete ahora. Inscripción gratuita:
http://www.expo-postgrados.com/feria2011
Este evento solo es una vez por año, y es la mejor oportunidad que tienes
pa
Dear dd,
I have seen that fedora is trying to consolidate the number of crypto
package shipped [1]. What do you think about this goal ?
Moreover a lot of keyring solution are available for the desktop but
are not directly compatible between them, and is near a nightmare (for
instance mozilla is n
So I have created list of affected packages (thanks to Neil Williams
for hinting dd-list), there are four lists:
1. Build-Depends on libdb[45]\..*-dev
http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB/Build-Depends
2. Depends
http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB/Depends
3. Depends - Build-Depends (aka indirect dep
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Uoti Urpala wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh debian.org> writes:
> > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > Telling someone "the bug is in a version I pulled from the VCS but didn't
> > > bother noting down which version it was" is not very useful.
> >
> > Now yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I've been asking this question on debian-mentors before, but people
involved into this process might be better addressed through d-d, so I
hope you don't mind as I got there no answer so far.
I was wondering what the exact requirements for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: cminpack
Version : 1.1.3
Upstream Author : Frederic Devernay
* URL : http://devernay.free.fr/hacks/cminpack/cminpack.html
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : softw
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: pcl
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Radu Bogdan Rusu (r...@willowgarage.com)
* URL : http://pointclouds.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : The Point Cloud
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:04:32 +0200
Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > Maybe a list of such rdepends package + maintainers would help.
>
> Packages are listed on transition tracking page and tagged with db5.1
> bug. I have added those two links to to the /BerkeleyDB page (the
> ReleaseGoals page already have
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:06, Olivier Berger
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Le lundi 25 avril 2011 à 10:29 +0200, Ondřej Surý a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> if your package depends on libdbX.Y you probably want to at least look at it:
>>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB
>> http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/Berke
27 matches
Mail list logo
