Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote on 2011-03-30 22:45:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
>> > How is the opinion about support for this alternative security
>> framework?
>>
>> I think it would be good to have it.
>
> O.k.
I never tried it, but I also think it would be
Good morning Paul,
Am 2011-04-01 14:14:36, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> As you can see here, he no longer has a GPG fingerprint in LDAP and is
> therefore retired and no longer involved in Debian:
>
> http://db.debian.org/search.cgi?uid=sfllaw&dosearch=Search...
Thanks for the info. I will
As you can see here, he no longer has a GPG fingerprint in LDAP and is
therefore retired and no longer involved in Debian:
http://db.debian.org/search.cgi?uid=sfllaw&dosearch=Search...
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.
Hello *,
I get following message back:
> --
>UNDELIVERABLE MAIL
>
> Your message to the following recipients cannot be delivered:
>
> :
> master.debian.org [70.103.162.29]:
> >>> RCPT TO:
> <<< 5
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
> wrote:
>
>> How is Java? Currently, I still need to install sun-java6-fonts to use Thai
>> on Java apps, and only Lucida is available via defoma.
>
> There is no defoma backend for Jav
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
wrote:
> How is Java? Currently, I still need to install sun-java6-fonts to use Thai
> on Java apps, and only Lucida is available via defoma.
There is no defoma backend for Java so whatever issues Java apps have
to do with fonts has noth
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> If anyone wants to help there, more info here:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/OldPkgRemovals#defoma
>
> Main blockers are Xorg, ghostscript and the other remaining backends
> (libwmf, vflib3).
How is Java? Currently, I still need to install sun-jav
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Michelle Konzack
wrote:
> I am working on a bunch of packages and write patches and I know how to
> use "quilt" but can someone tell me please, how I have to add quit to an
> existing Debian Package which does currently not use quilt but I need it
> to make things
Hello *,
I am working on a bunch of packages and write patches and I know how to
use "quilt" but can someone tell me please, how I have to add quit to an
existing Debian Package which does currently not use quilt but I need it
to make things easier?
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Mic
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> > > Does some Debian developer want to add userspace support into Debian?
> >
> > Why don't you do it?
>
> That's an idea. But my know-how is not very great in security frameworks.
> Especially someone who know SELinux would be a good reference.
If y
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Dennis van Dok (Software Engineer)"
* Package name: lcmaps
Version : 1.4.28
Upstream Author : Nikhef Grid MW Security
* URL :
http://www.nikhef.nl/pub/projects/grid/gridwiki/index.php/Site_Access_Control
* License : A
also sprach Vincent Danjean [2011.03.31.0925 +0200]:
> Martin F. Krafft started to implement a replacement of ifupdown
> that is better designed. But, due to lack of manpower I think,
> this project did not finish. See this archives of
> netconf-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org for more info.
Sadly,
* brian m. carlson , 2011-03-31, 20:09:
KiBi, thanks for the hint. It turned out that libgomp is not listed as
direct dependency of my library. Does it mean I have to put "gcc-4.4"
into debian/control -> Depends and add "-lgomp" to LIBS explicitly
during the linking stage?
You do need -lgomp.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:35:49PM +0200, Dmitry Katsubo wrote:
> KiBi, thanks for the hint. It turned out that libgomp is not listed as
> direct dependency of my library. Does it mean I have to put "gcc-4.4"
> into debian/control -> Depends and add "-lgomp" to LIBS explicitly
> during the linking
On 31.03.2011 18:20, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> you may want to check through objdump -x $foo.so|grep NEEDED; ldd
> shows recursive dependencies.
>
> KiBi.
KiBi, thanks for the hint. It turned out that libgomp is not listed as
direct dependency of my library. Does it mean I have to put "gcc-4.4"
in
Hi Agustin,
Thanks for your reply.
> Check that your debian/control has a Source section and that you are in the
> Maintainer field in it. Note that there must be a separate heading Source
> paragraph. Does .dsc shows a maintainer line? Did lintian complain?
My .dsc shows the Maintainer line[0]
Hello,
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:01:25 +0200
m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> The problem is with all features implemented by external if-*.d
> scripts. If e.g. a bridge is created by the first defined afi, the
> second script will fail. And if it does not fail on up then
> everything will stil
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:41:56PM -0500, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I am DM and I'm trying of upload ora2pg package, but the package is rejected:
>
> Reject Reasons:
> darkju...@gmail.com is not in Maintainer or Uploaders of source package ora2pg
Check that your debian/cont
Russell Coker wrote on 2011-03-30 22:45:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> > How is the opinion about support for this alternative security framework?
>
> I think it would be good to have it.
O.k.
> > Does some Debian developer want to add userspace support into Debian?
>
> Why
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 30.03.2011, 16:18 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
> The main use case I've seen mentioned on list to favor source only
> uploads over throw away debs is that of "low bandwidth" or "bandwidth
> limits". Most likely, that use case applies to very few people and the
> vast majo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrey Rahmatullin
* Package name: dwarftherapist
Version : 0.6.10+hgNN
Upstream Author : Trey Stout
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/dwarftherapist/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Helper t
Hi Everybody,
I am DM and I'm trying of upload ora2pg package, but the package is rejected:
Reject Reasons:
darkju...@gmail.com is not in Maintainer or Uploaders of source package ora2pg
When I look the package content, it looks right[0]. Any suggestion?
BTW, I am not sure if is a bug with new c
Hi,
Dmitry Katsubo (31/03/2011):
> The mentioned symbols are exported from libgomp (a part of gcc-4.4
> package), which is correctly linked to the SO:
>
> # ldd ./src/libosra_java.so | grep gomp
> libgomp.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgomp.so.1 (0xb68df000)
you may want to check through objdump
Dear developers,
I have the question concerning the following dh_shlibdeps warning, which
is triggered for library that is compiled witn OpenMP support:
>dh_shlibdeps
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol GOMP_critical_start used by
> debian/libosra0/usr/lib/libosra.so.0.0.10308 found in none of
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 04:23:33 AM Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> We have some packages that require a dedicated user to be created, and
> calling "adduser --system" in postinst does that. However, it is not
> always clear whether such users should be removed when the package is
> removed.
>
>
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:24:09 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> Because security.debian.org is not debian-mirror.lrz.de. The entries
> above are for security.debian.org, whereas the error message you quoted
> was for an entry containing debian-mirror.lrz.de; the entries for
> security are not what
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
* Package name: modsecurity-crs
Version : 2.1.2
Upstream Author : Trustwave
* URL : http://www.modsecurity.org/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: N/A
Description : modsecurity's Core Ru
Samuel Thibault (31/03/2011):
> Michael Biebl, le Thu 31 Mar 2011 14:30:06 +0200, a écrit :
> > As you can see, xserver-xorg still uses hal on kfreebsd, but iirc
> > KiBi did some work in that regard.
>
> AFAIK, it was agreed that hal is needed for now. FreeBSD's devd
> should be a long-term repl
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > > /etc/adjtime
> > >
> > > This needs to survive reboots, and it is also needed early in the boot.
> > > It is used to correct the RTC syndrome.
> > >
> > > I am at a loss about how it could
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > /etc/adjtime
> >
> > This needs to survive reboots, and it is also needed early in the boot.
> > It is used to correct the RTC syndrome.
> >
> > I am at a loss about how it could be made compatible with RO /.
> >
> > > > /etc/hosts.deny (written by
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:54:49AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> >I think so. The package with long names tend to follow a naming policy
> >> >that sort of imposes the long name... so if we p
Lars Wirzenius writes ("System users: removing them"):
> The easy solution for this would be to never remove the user, but that's
> also not so clear.
To remove a user and reclaim the uid is a difficult business.
> * Extra accounts are just wasteful, and may cause some confusion.
> *
Cc-ing debian-bsd, else they may simply not be aware of the thread...
Michael Biebl, le Thu 31 Mar 2011 14:30:06 +0200, a écrit :
> Am 31.03.2011 07:26, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 19:51:17 (CEST), Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> >> HAL removal is already in progress, see [1]
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:59 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/21/11 14:22, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 06:17 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you think that dkms should drop its /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms
> >> script
Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: throw away debs and source only uploads"):
> Most uploads are done using dput or dupload. We could add code to them
> to verify that there's binaries corresponding to the source that is
> about to be built.
We could have the archive scripts insist that the .debs have to
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:54:49AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >I think so. The package with long names tend to follow a naming policy
>> >that sort of imposes the long name... so if we put a too-short limit
>> >then we're asking them to
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:16:12PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 11:56:22 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> >Right, that's certainly true for the lib.*-perl packages, and I
>> >wouldn't know how we should rename them in a sane way.
>> In the worst case that I'm looking at, I'm
On Thu, March 31, 2011 09:18, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Its simpler: The Release files tell us which Codename and Suite this
> archive is for - if thats different from the one you mentioned in
> sources.list you will get this "lovely" warning
>
>
> And yes, Christoph is right, something is wrong
Am 31.03.2011 14:35, schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
>> Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd
>> still
>> require hal or will it
On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
> Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd still
> require hal or will it just have reduced functionality?
>
On BSD it's reduced f
Am 31.03.2011 07:26, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 19:51:17 (CEST), Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> HAL removal is already in progress, see [1]. Actually I've been working on
>> that
>> for some time already. I wouldn't object obviously making that a release
>> goal.
>
> How wel
[ Bcc: -release to keep track of the actual proposals ]
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> # package quality
> Advocate: Holger Levsen and Luk Claes
> State: confirmed
> Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/PackagesQuality
>
> This is a never ending goal of su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/21/11 14:22, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 06:17 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> Do you think that dkms should drop its /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms
>> script? AFAICS this script might be called before the headers are
>> installed
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:29:10 +0200, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> PS. I could not determine which mailing list is haunted by the ftp-masters.
> If debian-admin is wrong, please forward it.
http://www.debian.org/intro/organization#distribution
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Good afternoon.
I am the maintainer for the Standard ML 97 (SML) compiler mlton. This
compiler is itself written in SML and is self-hosting. Thus, it needs an
older version of the compiler in order to bootstrap itself. Further
complicating things, the build needs in the ballpark of 1-2GB of physic
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 00:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> However, having "squeeze" in sources.list whilst the Release file
> contains "stable" works okay, so I assume apt is managing the
> translation internally in that case.
Clarification: Thankfully it doesn't -- it would be another place to
kee
On 2011-03-30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> However, having "squeeze" in sources.list whilst the Release file
> contains "stable" works okay, so I assume apt is managing the
> translation internally in that case.
Nah, that's the bug we received and then assigned to ftp-master, which didn't
fix it ye
We have some packages that require a dedicated user to be created, and
calling "adduser --system" in postinst does that. However, it is not
always clear whether such users should be removed when the package is
removed.
* The user might be administered centrally, via LDAP. (So postinst
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org):
>
>> If anyone wants to help there, more info here:
>>
>> http://wiki.debian.org/OldPkgRemovals#defoma
>>
>> Main blockers are Xorg, ghostscript and the other remaining backends
>> (libwmf, vflib3).
>
* Andrei Popescu [2011-03-31 08:40]:
> apt-cache show putty
Gets the job done but is far from nice compared to SecureCRT. And the
seperation between putty, plink and pscp is for some a feature and for
some a pita, therefore an additional choice is definitely a plus.
Yours,
Martin
--
To UNSUB
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:48:06PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > /etc/adjtime
>
> This needs to survive reboots, and it is also needed early in the boot.
> It is used to correct the RTC syndrome.
>
> I am at a loss about how it
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Asias He [2011-03-31 03:03]:
>
>> * URL : http://code.google.com/lcrt
>
> That gives a 404.
The URL should be http://code.google.com/p/lcrt
--
Best Regards
Asias He
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@list
* Asias He [2011-03-31 03:03]:
> * URL : http://code.google.com/lcrt
That gives a 404.
Yours,
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20
Hi Michael,
thanks for the ITP. I'm forewarding it to Debian Science list. Please
consider to maintain it inside the Debian Science team.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:22:20PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Michael Wild
>
>
On 31/03/2011 00:25, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 00:01 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On Mar 30, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>
> For the IPv6 and LFS legacy release goals I think it would be best if we
> would welcome massive (automatic?) tests to find all of the outstanding
Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org):
> If anyone wants to help there, more info here:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/OldPkgRemovals#defoma
>
> Main blockers are Xorg, ghostscript and the other remaining backends
> (libwmf, vflib3).
Would you agree for us to be advocates of this release goal, Paul?
56 matches
Mail list logo
