Bug#615040: ITP: ruby-multibitnums -- Ruby extension library for integers with arbitrary bit lengths

2011-02-24 Thread Youhei SASAKI
Package: wnpp Owner: Youhei SASAKI Severity: wishlist * Package name: ruby-multibitnums Version : 0.1.2 Upstream Author : Takeshi Horinouchi http://ruby.gfd-dennou.org/products/multibitnums/ * License : Ruby's Description : Ruby extension library for integers with ar

Re: discussing upstream software on -devel (Re: Bug#614601: ITP: libsafewrite -- Simple functions for performing safe atomic replacement of files

2011-02-24 Thread Shachar Shemesh
On 23/02/11 12:23, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Mittwoch, 23. Februar 2011, Shachar Shemesh wrote: Giving feedback over the upstream trustworthiness is not the purpose of ITP bugs, oh, hell yes, it is. Where else should we discuss what software fits into Debian? debian-qa@ when it's

Bug#615038: ITP: libbrowser-open-perl -- Perl module to open a browser in a given URL

2011-02-24 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Package: wnpp Owner: Salvatore Bonaccorso Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libbrowser-open-perl Version : 0.03 Upstream Author : Pedro Melo * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Browser-Open/ * L

Bug#615033: ITP: gnome-web-photo -- Create snapshot images of and print web pages from the command line

2011-02-24 Thread Micah Gersten
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Micah Gersten * Package name: gnome-web-photo Version : 0.10 Upstream Author : Christian Persch , Vincent Untz * URL : http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-web-photo * License : LGPL 2.1 or later Programming Lang: (C)

Bug#615032: ITP: libsyntax-keyword-gather-perl -- Perl 5 module that implements the Perl 6 'gather/take' control structure

2011-02-24 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libsyntax-keyword-gather-perl Version : 1.001000 Upstream Author : Arthur Axel "fREW" Schmidt * URL : http://search.cpan.org

Bug#615030: ITP: libsyntax-perl -- pragma for activating syntax extensions

2011-02-24 Thread gregor herrmann
Package: wnpp Owner: gregor herrmann Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libsyntax-perl Version : 0.003 Upstream Author : Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/syntax/ * Li

Re: Small transition: protobuf 2.4.0

2011-02-24 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2011/2/21 Iustin Pop : > Hi all, > > I've uploaded to experimental the new protobuf version (2.4.0a) and this > brings as always a SONAME increase. It also has a new experimental > backend (C++-based) for the Python language bindings, hence the > heads-up. > > Here is the list of packages that

Re: Bug#615002: ITP: libjson-pp-perl -- yet another json package

2011-02-24 Thread James Vega
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > * Package name    : libjson-pp-perl >  Version         : 2.27104 >  Upstream Author : Makamaa hannyaharamitu > * URL             : http://search.cpan.org/dist/JSON-PP/ > * License         : Perl >  Programming Lang: Perl >  Description    

Bug#615002: ITP: libjson-pp-perl -- yet another json package

2011-02-24 Thread Nicholas Bamber
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicholas Bamber * Package name: libjson-pp-perl Version : 2.27104 Upstream Author : Makamaa hannyaharamitu * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/JSON-PP/ * License : Perl Programming Lang: Perl Description : yet a

Re: GNOME 3 and panel applets

2011-02-24 Thread Frederic Peters
Josselin Mouette wrote: > If you develop, maintain or use one of those packages, and you don’t > want it to disappear, your options are now: > > 1. Prepare to disable gnome-panel support (that’s for packages > which already have other options, such as using the notification >

Re: Packaging an RGTP server and client

2011-02-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Thomas Thurman writes ("Re: Packaging an RGTP server and client"): > Ian Jackson writes: > > Why not package the GROGGS RGTP server ? > > I'd far rather package the original rgtpd than Spurge. I'm not > aware offhand of where to get the source; could you let me know? Shame the AGPL didn't exist w

Re: Packaging an RGTP server and client

2011-02-24 Thread Thomas Thurman
Ian Jackson writes: > Why not package the GROGGS RGTP server ? I'd far rather package the original rgtpd than Spurge. I'm not aware offhand of where to get the source; could you let me know? > This bulletin board system is not a web bbs; it's a plain text BBS > with a web UI. I think that's a si

Re: Packaging an RGTP server and client

2011-02-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Thomas Thurman writes ("Packaging an RGTP server and client"): > There is a bulletin board system at Cambridge University called GROGGS[1]. > Since 1995 it has used a TCP protocol called RGTP[2], which also finds > limited use at a few other sites. Various pieces of software related to > RGTP exist

Re: Q: who uses busybox-static, what for, and your wishes for it?

2011-02-24 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Is busybox-static package actually in use? Do you have > suggestions for its configuration? It is not always easier to boot from an external medium, especially if the machine is $faraway and all you have is a serial console. Setting init to the stat

Q: who uses busybox-static, what for, and your wishes for it?

2011-02-24 Thread Michael Tokarev
The $Subj basically says it all. I'm trying to review configuration of different busubox packages, but I don't really see the intention for some of them, especially for the -static flavour of it. As originally created by Erik Andersen back in early 2000s, busybox-static intended to be a rescue/re

Bug#614940: ITP: libmoo-perl -- Minimalist Object Orientation (with Moose compatiblity)

2011-02-24 Thread Maximilian Gass
Package: wnpp Owner: Maximilian Gass Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libmoo-perl Version : 0.009005 Upstream Author : Matt S Trout * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Moo/ * License :

Re: Release file changes

2011-02-24 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 24 February 2011 11:29, Luca Niccoli wrote: > Did Packages.diff/Index use to contain an MD5sum? (it doesn't as of now) > Or is this some unrelated breakage? Mmm, if worked using ftp.debian.org, so it was a mirror problem I guess. Aptitude and apt didn't have any problems with it though. Sorr

Re: Release file changes

2011-02-24 Thread Luca Niccoli
On 21 February 2011 15:39, Joey Hess wrote: > Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> until today our Release files included 3 Hashes for all their entries: >> MD5SUM, SHA1, SHA256. I just modified the code to no longer include >> MD5SUM in *all* newly generated Release files. cowbuilder --create fails with: W

Re: Upcoming changes in Lintian & some bits

2011-02-24 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Donnerstag, den 24.02.2011, 08:16 +0100 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez: > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 22:47 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > As a consequence of these changes, the new Lintian release will cause > > many existing overrides to no longer apply. We recognise that this will > > lead to some

Re: Fwd: paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2011-02-24 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Am 24.02.2011 10:26, schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: Dear DDs, A user discover the wrong source for paraview 3.8.1 were pushed to debian repository. To fix this mistake, I asked for the removal of the paraview package to be able to quickly reupload it. This was very quickly executed by ftpteam.

Re: Fwd: paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2011-02-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Mathieu Malaterre (24/02/2011): > Is there anything I would be missing ? […] > Reject Reasons: > paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.changes file already known to dak You already uploaded this version, and even if it got removed, you can't upload it back AFAICT. > mathieu.malate...@gmail.com may not upload N

Fwd: paraview_3.8.1-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2011-02-24 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Dear DDs, A user discover the wrong source for paraview 3.8.1 were pushed to debian repository. To fix this mistake, I asked for the removal of the paraview package to be able to quickly reupload it. This was very quickly executed by ftpteam. However even if paraview has been removed from testi