Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmoosex-multimethods-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Florian Ragwitz
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-MultiMe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐)"
* Package name: libextutils-libbuilder-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/ExtUtils-LibBuilder/
* License : Artistic, GPL-1+
Pro
On 12/26/2010 09:15 PM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This release update announced:
>
> As hinted in the previous release update, now is the time to decide
> exactly what is going in to squeeze and what isn't. Here's what
> we're going to propose regarding the remaining RC bugs.
>
> We'l
Hi,
This release update announced:
As hinted in the previous release update, now is the time to
decide exactly what is going in to squeeze and what isn't. Here's
what we're going to propose regarding the remaining RC bugs.
We'll be working against the list of RC bugs affecting S
On 2010-12-25, Andres Mejia wrote:
> The release-critical bugs pages at [1] need some work. For instance, a lot of
> the bugs mentioned on the "all" page are already closed. There are at least
> half
> as many open release critical bugs than what the page claims. Also, there are
> several release
On 12/26/2010 02:10 PM, Malte Forkel wrote:
> Am 25.12.2010 20:18, schrieb Michael Banck:
>>
>> Why can't this be part of pbuilder itself? Did your patches got
>> rejected by the pbuilder author and if so, what was his rationale?
>> Maybe if he thinks they should not be part of pbuilder, they shou
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 14:10:08 +0100
Malte Forkel wrote:
> But, aside from the pbuilder specifics: Is there any policy, best
> practice, or LSB scheme for extending an existing package? Are there
> any hooks to re-apply changes to an existing package after it has
> been updated?
Only if that packa
Am 25.12.2010 20:18, schrieb Michael Banck:
>
> Why can't this be part of pbuilder itself? Did your patches got
> rejected by the pbuilder author and if so, what was his rationale?
> Maybe if he thinks they should not be part of pbuilder, they shouldn't
> be part of another package either.
>
I
Package: wnpp
Owner: Rafael Kitover
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libdbix-class-candy-perl
Version : 0.001005
Upstream Author : Arthur Axel "fREW" Schmidt
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist
9 matches
Mail list logo