Package: wnpp
Owner: tak...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: haskell-bytestring-nums
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Jason Dusek
* URL or Web page : http://github.com/solidsnack/bytestring-nums
* License : BSD
Description : Parse numeric literals from
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Tristan Schmelcher
wrote:
>>> See also dpkg-query -f '${Conffiles}' -W .
>>
>> Aha! It gets them from /var/lib/dpkg/status. Should be easy to tap into.
>>
>>
>
> I've changed apt-diff to make use of this, and it has improved speed
> by 25% when diff'ing my entire f
>> See also dpkg-query -f '${Conffiles}' -W .
>
> Aha! It gets them from /var/lib/dpkg/status. Should be easy to tap into.
>
>
I've changed apt-diff to make use of this, and it has improved speed
by 25% when diff'ing my entire filesystem! Takes only 6 minutes now.
:)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
* Raphael Geissert , 2010-12-16, 12:00:
Automated Code Analysis helps detect and fix bugs and other issues in
source code. The project aims to give users easy access to a wide
variety of tools to improve quality of software distributed by Debian,
while giving the tool's developers a test bed, m
Mehdi Dogguy, le Thu 16 Dec 2010 10:17:05 +0100, a écrit :
> On 12/15/2010 07:02 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB,
> >> still can't fit on just CD1.
> >
> > This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7
> > re
Hi!
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 01:41:38 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [brian m. carlson]
> > IIRC, the reason md5sums of conffiles are shipped is to determine
> > whether they have been changed by the administrator so that dpkg
> > knows whether to automatically replace them with newer versions or
>
Hi!
Finally, from long time ago, I have enough time to work with my Debian
stuff.
> In that case, please follow sourceforge's procedures to take over the
> project:
>
>
> http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Abandoned%20Project%20Takeovers
>
>
I just create the ticket requesting to
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 01:53:29PM +, Ian Roberts wrote:
> Hi Holger,
>
> These binaries are segfaulting on the physical host itself. The host just
> runs some vm's too. top,w,exim are all fine on the vms themselves.
You are running an old kernel which has known bugs, including many
securi
Hi Ian,
On Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010, Ian Roberts wrote:
> These binaries are segfaulting on the physical host itself. The host just
> runs some vm's too. top,w,exim are all fine on the vms themselves.
Ah. Then (most probably) either the host hardware has a problem, or the kernel
dealing w
Hi Holger,
These binaries are segfaulting on the physical host itself. The host just runs
some vm's too. top,w,exim are all fine on the vms themselves.
On 16 Dec 2010, at 12:30, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed a
Hi,
It's now more than 6 months since this bug was reported, and it is still
a blocker for ulogd2 (see #502305). Version 1.0.0 also fixes several
important bugs.
The packages are ready since some time and have been proposed in august,
with no reply (see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Hi!
Am 16.12.2010 13:51, schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> for each package currently in the NEW queue (i.e. from minidlna on)
> clicking on the version number to get further information about the
> packag results in an 404 Error, e.g. "The requested URL
> /new/minidlna_1.0.18-4.html was not found on t
Hi all,
for each package currently in the NEW queue (i.e. from minidlna on)
clicking on the version number to get further information about the
packag results in an 404 Error, e.g. "The requested URL
/new/minidlna_1.0.18-4.html was not found on this server".
What's the cause of this and when
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On 12/12/2010 20:27, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>>> On la, 2010-12-11 at 17:04 +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
I agree it's not optimal, hence my push for auto linking.
>>>
>>>
Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:26:51 +0100
with message-id <201012161326.52098.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#607256: general: various programs generate segfaults,
like top, w and exim
has caused the Debian Bug report #607256,
regarding general: various programs generate s
Package: general
Severity: serious
Justification: 1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Sh
On 12/15/2010 07:02 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB,
>> still can't fit on just CD1.
>
> This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7
> reach testing. Should happen by monday, would appreciate any testing you
>
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Timur Birsh]
>> OK. I will use debian-inadyn for account name group names.
>> Thank you all.
>
> Note that exim uses capital D in Debian for its user name. You might
> want to be consistent and use Debian-inadyn.
transmission-daemon[1] package uses lower-case d
Hi all,
I'm sending this request for help in the hope that it randomly hit one
of the smart people on this list, but it is, as far as I can tell, not
Debian specific.
Fakeroot-ng is a clean re-implementation of the fakeroot principle,
based on ptrace rather than LD_PRELOAD. As a result it ca
19 matches
Mail list logo
