Bug#600981: ITP: lv2file -- A command-line program to apply LV2 effects to files

2010-10-21 Thread Jeremy Salwen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jeremy Salwen Package name: lv2file * Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Jeremy Salwen * URL : http://code.google.com/p/lv2file/ * License : GPL 3 Programming Lang: C Description : A command-line program to apply L

Work-needing packages report for Oct 22, 2010

2010-10-21 Thread wnpp
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the last week. Total number of orphaned packages: 0 (new: 0) Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 0 (new: 0) Total number of packages requested h

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-21 Thread Bob Proulx
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote: > Simon McVittie wrote: > >... so in practice, staff is root-equivalent, but in principle it's > >not meant to be. (Yay.) > > It depends on the definition of "equivalent". > > Anyway "staff" is a protection against user (aka admin)* errors*, > not against *malicious* a

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-21 Thread Carsten Hey
* Russ Allbery [2010-10-21 02:37 -0700]: > I like sudoroot, personally, but I think sudo is probably okay. A group named sudo or sudoroot is somehow linked to sudo as tool used to gain administrative privileges. No one knows if in future an other tool will be the de facto standard to gain privile

Re: RFH: bug squashing for php5

2010-10-21 Thread Thomas Hochstein
Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:10:45AM +0200, Ond?ej Surý wrote: >> we currently lack hands for testing and bug squashing in php5. I have just >> uploaded php5 5.3.3-2 to unstable and as soon as it get built it would be >> great if we had more hands to go through all the bugs in

Re: Init dependency between nfs-kernel-server and name server

2010-10-21 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Petter Reinholdtsen | [Goswin von Brederlow] | > That way nfs-kernel-server is started after the name resolvers but | > none of them is required. Does that look right? | | Nope. Virtual facilities (like $named and $local_fs) provided by | several scripts should not be listed in the Provides

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-21 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
On 20.10.10 13:28, Simon McVittie wrote: Quoting from base-passwd again: Allows users to add local modifications to the system (/usr/local, /home) without needing root privileges. Compare with group 'adm', which is more related to monitoring/security. Note that the ability

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-21 Thread Philip Hands
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:49:00 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org): > ... > Maybe sudo is not that bad, after all..:-) If we decide to reject 'admin', I think we should use sudo. I find the argument that admin is confusing given the presence of adm fairly con

Bug#600914: ITP: mididings -- MIDI router and processor based on Python

2010-10-21 Thread Alessio Treglia
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia * Package name: mididings Version : 20100602 Upstream Author : Dominic Sacre * URL : http://das.nasophon.de/mididings/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : MIDI router and proces

Bug#600891: marked as done (general: Qt-based browsers crash when loading some web sites)

2010-10-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:23:30 +0200 with message-id <201010211223.30735.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: Bug#600891: general: Qt-based browsers crash when loading some web sites has caused the Debian Bug report #600891, regarding general: Qt-based browsers crash when load

Excessive permissions for users in group wheel.

2010-10-21 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Russell Coker [101020 11:22]: > > This would hurt systems where umask is 002 (or 007) by default (the root > > group is the primary group of the root user with nobody else in it) > > find / -gid 0 -perm /20 \! -type l I guess find / -gid 0 -perm /20 \! -type l \! -perm /2 reduces the number of

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-21 Thread Russ Allbery
Christian PERRIER writes: > Quoting Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org): >> Any already-existing group is going to have the problem that some sites >> will already be using it for something else. We put all sysadmins in > Isn't that the same for any kind of clever group name we'll find? > Unless we

Re: RFH: bug squashing for php5

2010-10-21 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:10:45AM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > we currently lack hands for testing and bug squashing in php5. I have just > uploaded php5 5.3.3-2 to unstable and as soon as it get built it would be > great if we had more hands to go through all the bugs in the src=php5 and > te

RFH: bug squashing for php5

2010-10-21 Thread Ondřej Surý
Hi, we currently lack hands for testing and bug squashing in php5. I have just uploaded php5 5.3.3-2 to unstable and as soon as it get built it would be great if we had more hands to go through all the bugs in the src=php5 and test if they are still present in 5.3.3 version. And if they are not, t

Re: Packages/DiffIndex

2010-10-21 Thread André Berger
* André Berger (2010-10-20): Dear all, allow me to reply to myself to close this topic. A Diff/Index seems not to be beneficial for a small repository like mine, I'll stick with apt-ftparchive. Thanks for your attention and your time! -André -- L'art d'ennuyer est de tout dire. [Voltaire]

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-21 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:38:41AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > So, I'm wondering if we shouldn't pick a more neutral name without a previous > history in Debian. > One suggestion is to use group "admin". Ubuntu has been using that group for > exactly the purpose what we are going for and I t

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-21 Thread Ben Finney
Christian PERRIER writes: > And for ${deity}'s sake, people […] should stop talking about > 'bikeshedding' [which has the condescending] implication: the > discussion is useless. > > This discussion is not. > > We will have to live with whatever group name we choose now for > *years*, so better c

Re: Bit from the Release Team: Status of hppa

2010-10-21 Thread Philipp Kern
On 2010-10-20, Bill Allombert wrote: > What is omitted is the rationale for doing so at this stage. Removing an > release architecture with an active porter group is not something that > should be done on the ground of some administrative evaluation table. You surely read the IRC meeting logs? A

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-21 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org): > > How about the "root" group? > > Any already-existing group is going to have the problem that some sites > will already be using it for something else. We put all sysadmins in Isn't that the same for any kind of clever group name we'll find? Unless we

Bug#600903: ITP: letterize -- phone digits to letter-mnemonics

2010-10-21 Thread Francois Marier
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Francois Marier * Package name: letterize Version : 1.3 Upstream Author : Eric S. Raymond * URL : http://www.catb.org/~esr/letterize/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: C Description : phone digits to letter-mnemo