On 09/26/2010 03:45 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 26.09.2010, 08:50 + schrieb Philipp Kern:
>> On 2010-09-26, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> On Sa, Sep 25, 2010 at 21:59:51 (CEST), James Vega wrote:
No, it builds all the content for arch:all and non-arch:all, but only
cr
Hi Raphael
On 09/26/2010 08:40 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Of course there are multiple reasons. Though I think one of the most
>> obvious ones is that we as a project don't do a genuine stable release
>> often so sometimes delay the freeze willingly or no
>>> Yet another autoconf version, as if the four that we already have in the
>>> archive weren't enough. :-( But it is needed for ncurses if we ever
>>> need to patch configure.in, see #580190.
>> And its not possible to fixup the idiot who uses an own autoconf
>> version?
> Considering that his
Am Sonntag, den 26.09.2010, 08:50 + schrieb Philipp Kern:
> On 2010-09-26, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > On Sa, Sep 25, 2010 at 21:59:51 (CEST), James Vega wrote:
> >> No, it builds all the content for arch:all and non-arch:all, but only
> >> creates the non-arch:all binaries. The issue is that
Hi Luk,
thanks for your valuable comments.
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> Of course there are multiple reasons. Though I think one of the most
> obvious ones is that we as a project don't do a genuine stable release
> often so sometimes delay the freeze willingly or not. Another reason
>
On 09/26/2010 05:02 PM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Why would non-frequent snapshots help more than frequent snapshots?
>>
>> Because in that case they could really be used and supported for
>> installing, better user testing, security...
>
> I
On 09/26/2010 04:40 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Luk,
Hi Lucas
Note that this is my personal opinion and does not represent the opinion
of the Release Team perse.
> On 26/09/10 at 15:55 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> I think this is completely the wrong question, we'd better ask the
>> question: W
Hey,
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
> IMHO, what is missing from rolling should be added to testing, not
> worked around by introducing another suite:
I believe it's the other way around, actually. To me, adding stuff to
testing is the workaround. Testing is not meant to be u
Hi Luk,
On 26/09/10 at 15:55 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> I think this is completely the wrong question, we'd better ask the
> question: Why do freezes have to take that long?
I would be interested in hearing your answer to that question. It would
help to understand the rest of your mail. It seems t
Hi Raphael
On 09/23/2010 02:30 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
>>> discussing CUT on -de...@.
>>> Free link: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
>>
>> Personally I have th
On 2010-09-26, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sa, Sep 25, 2010 at 21:59:51 (CEST), James Vega wrote:
>> No, it builds all the content for arch:all and non-arch:all, but only
>> creates the non-arch:all binaries. The issue is that there's currently
>> no way for the buildds to say "Only build the no
On Sa, Sep 25, 2010 at 21:59:51 (CEST), James Vega wrote:
> No, it builds all the content for arch:all and non-arch:all, but only
> creates the non-arch:all binaries. The issue is that there's currently
> no way for the buildds to say "Only build the non-arch:all content"
> since the only required
12 matches
Mail list logo
