Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> That is: considering that introducing a new web server in the archive
> will potentially increase the work of the security team, it must be
> worth.
You know, introducing any package that is capable of network traffic
in either direction can potentially increase the wor
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:04:24PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > That's not a bug in debhelper; it's a bug in the backport of the
> > package, so it shouldn't be filed against debhelper. [Though, perhaps
> > it could be a wishlist request; I don't know
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:03:14PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > This would already reduce the load on the FTP, release and security
> > teams, and allow their members to do more useful things.
> And would lead many people to choose other distributions that offer more than
> merely core packag
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:04:24PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> That's not a bug in debhelper; it's a bug in the backport of the
> package, so it shouldn't be filed against debhelper. [Though, perhaps
> it could be a wishlist request; I don't know.]
No, it's a bug in the debhelper backport.
If b
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> That would equally make "all bpo bugs go to the BTS" in my case. Thanks, but
> no,
> thanks. Especially not if the "bug" is caused by a external package and/or
> debhelper
> backported but its scripts not adapted back to lenny so that e.g. the built
>
On 2010-09-08, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
>> This would already reduce the load on the FTP, release and security
>> teams, and allow their members to do more useful things.
> And would lead many people to choose other distributions that offer more
> than merely core packages.
Could people please stop
On Wednesday 08 September 2010 09:28:24 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 01:33 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
> > On Tuesday 07 September 2010 15:18:26 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > No. gnome-user-share does not need root permissions.
> >
> > I use kde. After installing
ÄãºÃ£¡
ÎÒ¹«Ë¾£I´úÀíÈ«ø¸÷µØ¸÷·N(ø¡¢µØ) @�...@r°l%_/ƱL/
Ë°µãµÍÁ®£¬¿É²éÔ»òò×CáḶ/¿î,
ÓÐÐèÒªÕíµçÂϵ£º
µç»° £º¡¾ 135 1012 4818 ¡¿
Q Q£º ¡¾623 292 963 ¡¿
СÕÅ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Sorry, debian-rele...@bugs.d.o really doesn't exist...
> Hi all,
>
> (Dared to fix CC/Subject which seemed to be somewhat broken in initial email.)
>
> > The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
> > hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
> >
> > The issue see
Hi all,
(Dared to fix CC/Subject which seemed to be somewhat broken in initial email.)
> The release team have been asked to remove ClamAV from testing (and
> hence the next stable release. See bug #587058.
>
> The issue seems to be that it's not supportable in stable due to the
> upstream maint
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 15:18, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 11:17 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
>> On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> > Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
>> > spend 5 minutes to configu
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 02:09:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
>
> > For the package in question, the backports are done by a fellow
> > comaintainer, so I'm not complaining about the bug traffic; but that
> > doesn't mean it's *right* for that traffic to be going to
On 07.09.2010 11:17, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 10:47:08 Josselin Mouette wrote:
Oh, please. If you want to setup such schemes, why would you not want to
spend 5 minutes to configure apache or lighttpd instead of spending at
least the same time to configure such an obscu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Piotr Ożarowski"
* Package name: logbook
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Armin Ronacher
* URL : http://logbook.pocoo.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : logging replacement for Python
Si
Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 01:33 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit :
> On Tuesday 07 September 2010 15:18:26 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > No. gnome-user-share does not need root permissions.
> I use kde. After installing your gnome-user-share it i couldn't find how to
> start it. I found a config
15 matches
Mail list logo
