]] Ian Zimmerman
| So, out of 273 doc-containing packages on this system, just 70 bothered.
| I feel a strong urge to put the commands in a script that will auto-file
| a bug against any package in the output of the last command. How do
| maintainers feel about that?
I've never understood the p
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 06:08:50PM +, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> PDFs have titles too, and they can't be snarfed in any way I know of.
pdftk will dump the info dictionary for PDFs, but if you want something
a little less heavyweight, try:
lakeview ok % zgrep -a '^/Title'
/usr/share/doc/texmf/l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Chris Silva
* Package name: Marave
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Roberto Alsina
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/marave/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A text editor that helps you f
After a discussion on IRC, I organized a BoF at DebConf10 to discuss new
source formats, specifically 3.0 (git). Below are the notes from that
discussion. I tried to take reasonably comprehensive notes, but I'm sure
that I missed things. Other participants, please add any additional bits
that I
Steve Langasek debian.org> writes:
> But again, as Thomas points out, you can address this use case with much
> less per-package effort. A centralized ten-line shell script would be
> enough to locate all the installed packages on the system that ship files
> under /usr/share/doc not matching th
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:15:35AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> iputils-ping: /bin/ping6
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb770d000)
> libresolv.so.2 => /lib/i686/cmov/libresolv.so.2 (0x472dc000)
> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> (0x4882b000)
> li
On August 10, 2010 03:53:10 pm Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bruce Sass writes:
> > I was curious so...
> > $ for f in /bin/* /sbin/*; do if [ "`file $f | grep ELF`" != "" ] ;
> > then if [ "`ldd $f | grep /usr`" != "" ] ; then echo `dpkg -S $f`;
> > ldd $f; fi; fi; done
> > iputils-ping: /bin/pin
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:53:10PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bruce Sass writes:
>
> > I was curious so...
> > $ for f in /bin/* /sbin/*; do if [ "`file $f | grep ELF`" != "" ] ; then
> > if [ "`ldd $f | grep /usr`" != "" ] ; then echo `dpkg -S $f`; ldd $f;
> > fi; fi; done
> > iputil
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:53:10PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bruce Sass writes:
> Note that there is /lib/libcrypt* (at least here). This is just the more
> optimized flavour the ld.so picks when the cpu supports it.
libcrypt != libcrypto.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
Bruce Sass writes:
> I was curious so...
> $ for f in /bin/* /sbin/*; do if [ "`file $f | grep ELF`" != "" ] ; then
> if [ "`ldd $f | grep /usr`" != "" ] ; then echo `dpkg -S $f`; ldd $f;
> fi; fi; done
> iputils-ping: /bin/ping6
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb770d000)
> libresolv.so
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:29:39PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I just tried to give some advise about proper placement of database
> files in a Debian package and I was sure I could simply link to the
> relevant paragraph in policy but there is none. Is the usage of
> /var/lib/ just a reasonable
[Ian Jackson]
> So while it doesn't use run-parts, it's halfway there already. I
> use adduser.local on chiark.
Definitely useful, but not enought, as the debian-edu-config package
would break policy if it included a file in /usr/local/, and only one
package can provide this script at the time wh
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I just tried to give some advise about proper placement of database
> files in a Debian package and I was sure I could simply link to the
> relevant paragraph in policy but there is none. Is the usage of
> /var/lib/ just a reasonable habit which is shared
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 04:30:14PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> - I've been contacting (thanks to Sune Vuorela and Michael Prokop)
> people from the KDE e.V. board about their incredibly successful
> sprint program [11]. I'm still fleshing out details (ATM we have
> significantly less
Hi,
I just tried to give some advise about proper placement of database
files in a Debian package and I was sure I could simply link to the
relevant paragraph in policy but there is none. Is the usage of
/var/lib/ just a reasonable habit which is shared by
postgresql, mysql and probably others an
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 20:55 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2010-05-11, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > Surely not. Chromium ships a *private* copy of ffmpeg, more precisely, a
> > fork of ffmpeg called ffmpeg-mt. Debian does not include ffmpeg-mt
> > because of bug #575600 (tagged wontfix). Mor
Petter Reinholdtsen writes ("More advanced home directory creation in Debian?"):
> It would be nice if all the tools copying /etc/skel/ also had a common
> location for their "post-creating" scripts, making sure users created
> by for example adduser, lwat, libpam-mkhomedir and libpam-mklocaluser
>
Simon McVittie writes:
> It might be worth having a Lintian check for the situation you describe,
> since missing libraries will generally prevent the executable from
> starting up at all, whereas missing bits of /usr/share or /var might not
> be so important.
Unfortunately, there isn't any way
I am particularly interested in liblog-dispatch-perl [1] because it's
blocking other things I need to fix in webgui. Regardless, his QA page
shows little activity. Has anyone seen any sign of him?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576912
--
Ernesto Hernández-Novich - @iamemhn -
On August 10, 2010 04:25:07 am Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 at 03:15:35 -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > AFAICT, the reason is so that a minimal but functional system is
> > guaranteed to exist so long as a local HDD with a root filesystem
> > is available
>
> The fact that you can use i
On August 10, 2010 04:18:10 am Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:15:35AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > /sbin and /usr/sbin, /lib and /usr/lib directories?
> >
> > AFAICT, the reason is so that a minimal but functional system is
> > guaranteed to exist so long as a local HDD wit
Simon McVittie wrote:
> The FHS says mkfs.* have to be on the root filesystem. I'm not entirely clear
> why this is.
Well, I personally believe this holds for at least two of the purposes
listed in FHS Chapter 3:
* To enable recovery and/or repair of a system
* To restore a system
To recover a d
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 at 03:15:35 -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> AFAICT, the reason is so that a minimal but functional system is
> guaranteed to exist so long as a local HDD with a root filesystem is
> available
The fact that you can use it for troubleshooting/repairs is a nice (and
desirable) side-e
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 03:15:35AM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> /sbin and /usr/sbin, /lib and /usr/lib directories?
>
> AFAICT, the reason is so that a minimal but functional system is
> guaranteed to exist so long as a local HDD with a root filesystem is
> available (which doesn't necessarily inc
/sbin and /usr/sbin, /lib and /usr/lib directories?
AFAICT, the reason is so that a minimal but functional system is
guaranteed to exist so long as a local HDD with a root filesystem is
available (which doesn't necessarily include /usr); and that is a good
thing to have because it gives develop
Hi thanks For forwarding this mail which help many people to earn if it is
not fake could You please send some proofs so that we can ensure that the
company is paying and tell us how to make a use of it and the whole process
.
Maria
26 matches
Mail list logo
