Bug#588883: ITP: strongwind -- A GUI test automation framework

2010-07-12 Thread Ray Wang
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Ray Wang * Package name: strongwind Version : 0.9 Upstream Author : Raul Jimenez Bailey Kong Jonatha Tai Andreas Nilsson (Strongwind Logo) * URL : http://medsphere.o

Re: [RFC] removing xserver-xorg-video-nv from squeeze

2010-07-12 Thread Stephen Powell
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:24:56 -0400 (EDT), Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-07-12 21:09 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote: >> If nouveau set KMS by default, as the intel driver does, but did not >> *require* KMS, I would agree. But the last time I checked, using the nouveau >> driver *forces* KMS. I don't

"dh" and dh_installxmlcatalogs

2010-07-12 Thread Jack Bates
What's the preferred way to get "dh" to run dh_installxmlcatalogs? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1278985628.6812.33.ca...@selene

Re: architecture limitation question

2010-07-12 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Peter Samuelson writes: > [Goswin von Brederlow] >> On the other hand limiting the architectures in debian/control has no >> effect at all for buildds (or wanna-build). The relevant file would >> be the Packages-Arch-Specific file. > > I've heard this for years. Why do we have an Architecture: f

Re: [RFC] removing xserver-xorg-video-nv from squeeze

2010-07-12 Thread Bill Allombert
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 08:05:25PM +, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-07-12 21:09 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote: > > > If nouveau set KMS by default, as the intel driver does, but did not > > *require* KMS, I would agree. But the last time I checked, using the > > nouveau > > driver *forces* KMS

Bug#588858: ITP: python-flufl.i18n -- A high level API for internationalization

2010-07-12 Thread Barry Warsaw
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Barry Warsaw * Package name: python-flufl.i18n Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : Barry Warsaw * URL : https://launchpad.net/flufl.i18n * License : LGPLv3 Programming Lang: Python Description : A high level API f

Bug#588857: ITP: python-flufl.enum -- A Python enumeration package

2010-07-12 Thread Barry Warsaw
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Barry Warsaw * Package name: python-flufl.enum Version : 3.0.1 Upstream Author : Barry Warsaw * URL : http://launchpad.net/flufl.enum * License : LGPLv3 Programming Lang: Python Description : A Python enumeratio

Re: [RFC] removing xserver-xorg-video-nv from squeeze

2010-07-12 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-07-12 21:09 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote: > If nouveau set KMS by default, as the intel driver does, but did not > *require* KMS, I would agree. But the last time I checked, using the nouveau > driver *forces* KMS. I don't like that. I still use, and prefer, hardware > text mode virtual

Re: [RFC] removing xserver-xorg-video-nv from squeeze

2010-07-12 Thread Stephen Powell
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:33:15 -0400 (EDT), Julien Cristau wrote: > > We're considering the removal of xserver-xorg-video-nv (the "free" X > driver for nvidia hardware) from sid and squeeze. I'm replying to both debian-x and debian-devel, but I am only subscribed to debian-devel. If you post only

[RFC] removing xserver-xorg-video-nv from squeeze

2010-07-12 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, We're considering the removal of xserver-xorg-video-nv (the "free" X driver for nvidia hardware) from sid and squeeze. Some reasons are: - the source is obfuscated [0] - nvidia stopped maintaining it [1] - nouveau seems to be mostly ready to replace it, although it has some pains, including

Re: architecture limitation question

2010-07-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:46:22 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Goswin von Brederlow] > > On the other hand limiting the architectures in debian/control has no > > effect at all for buildds (or wanna-build). The relevant file would > > be the Packages-Arch-Specific file. > > I've heard this

Re: architecture limitation question

2010-07-12 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Goswin von Brederlow] > On the other hand limiting the architectures in debian/control has no > effect at all for buildds (or wanna-build). The relevant file would > be the Packages-Arch-Specific file. I've heard this for years. Why do we have an Architecture: field at all, instead of just Arch

Re: Bug#588526: ITP: cpm -- Console Password Manager

2010-07-12 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10-07-2010 08:57, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: [...] > The reason for looking at "cpm" was because it filled a need not > satisfied by 'pwsafe', 'gnome-keyring' or 'kwallet', which was "shared, > console-based storage for secret information".