On: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 17:44:05 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
> "Joachim Wiedorn" wrote:
>> I see that more people than thought still want to have or need LiLO.
>> Now I have decided to start and reanimate the upstream development.
>> Everyone is invited to join in this development. I'm worki
Hi,
- "Joachim Wiedorn" wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote on 2010-06-05 22:30:
>
> > On Wed, 26 May 2010, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > > You're missing the point. The main selling point to management
> > > is that Linux is free. If they have to buy new backup software
> > > in order to accommod
David Kalnischkies writes:
> 2010/6/6 Ludovic Brenta :
>> Package: gnat
>> Architecture: any
>> Depends: gnat-4.4 (>= 4.4.2-1)
>> Recommends: ada-reference-manual, gnat-gps
>> Breaks: libadasockets-dev (<= 1.8.6-2), libasis-dev, libaunit-dev,
>> libaws-dev, libflorist-dev, libgnademysql-dev, libgn
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:29:01PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 18:06 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> > [Bill Allombert]
> > > Dear developers,
> > > Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low.
> >
> > Very good to hear. If only we could
2010/6/6 Ludovic Brenta :
> Package: gnat
> Architecture: any
> Depends: gnat-4.4 (>= 4.4.2-1)
> Recommends: ada-reference-manual, gnat-gps
> Breaks: libadasockets-dev (<= 1.8.6-2), libasis-dev, libaunit-dev,
> libaws-dev, libflorist-dev, libgnademysql-dev, libgnadeodbc-dev,
> libgnadepostgresql-
Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 18:53 +0200, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
> No. Besides that I think it would be bad to forbid correct dependencies it
> would break some subpolicies. (I have the cli-uno-bridge <->
> libuno-cppuhelper1.0-cil
> one in mind, see #495748).
This is a very classical case of cir
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 19:18:19 +0200
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:15:41PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > The bug report doesn't explain why this needs to be a Depends:
> > either - it could be a Recommends AFAICT. To quote the report,
> > "which for some stuff needs" - the
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 09:39:59 -0400 (EDT), Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
>
> I see that more people than thought still want to have or need LiLO. Now
> I have decided to start and reanimate the upstream development. Everyone
> is invited to join in this development. I'm working on LiLO version 23.
>
>
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:15:41PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> The bug report doesn't explain why this needs to be a Depends: either -
> it could be a Recommends AFAICT. To quote the report, "which for some
> stuff needs" - the definition of a Recommends in my book. If
"some stuff" in t
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:53:04 +0200
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:29:01PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 18:06 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen a
> > écrit :
> > > [Bill Allombert]
> > > > Dear developers,
> > > > Today circular dependencies in unstable
(better late than never)
2010/6/3 Ludovic Brenta :
> Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
>> David Kalnischkies wrote:
>>> With the break you can force the update of old-libs, which
>>> could depend in their new version on the new-libs.
>
> OK, I just tried that (in a local repository). Having gnat brea
(better late than never)
2010/6/1 Jacob Sparre Andersen :
> David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> 2010/5/31 Ludovic Brenta :
>>> Question 2: if I add Breaks: to a -dev package, which ones of Conflicts:
>>> and Replaces: should I also specify? (currently, both are specified; the new
>>> packages replace alm
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:34 PM, David Kalnischkies
wrote:
> In regards to APT i will have a look later how to implement it,
> hints regarding a good error message are welcomed
> as i can currently only thing about stuff like:
>>
> W: http://debian.example.org squeeze Release: The Validation da
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:29:01PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 18:06 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> > [Bill Allombert]
> > > Dear developers,
> > > Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low.
> >
> > Very good to hear. If only we c
2010/6/6 Joey Hess :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> It does. If you don’t re-run “apt-get update”, the signature will be
>> considered invalid.
>
> j...@gnu:~/tmp/apt-0.7.26~exp5>grep -i Valid-Until -r .
> zsh: exit 2 grep -i Valid-Until -r .
>
> What'm I missing?
Nothing - or at least I didn't
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:29:01 +0200
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 18:06 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> > [Bill Allombert]
> > > Dear developers,
> > > Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low.
> >
> > Very good to hear. If only we could get i
--=20
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 18:06 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> [Bill Allombert]
> > Dear developers,
> > Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low.
>
> Very good to hear. If only we could get it down to zero, piuparts
> would be able to test all the packages and a m
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Fernando Lemos:
>
>> 1. Man-in-the-middle attacks between clients and security update servers
>> 2. Denial-of-service attacks to the security updates infrastructure
>> 3. No trusted servers for security updates for testing and unstable
>>
>
[Bill Allombert]
> Dear developers,
> Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low.
Very good to hear. If only we could get it down to zero, piuparts
would be able to test all the packages and a more deterministic
package installation order would be ensured. :)
Happy hacking,
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> It does. If you don’t re-run “apt-get update”, the signature will be
> considered invalid.
j...@gnu:~/tmp/apt-0.7.26~exp5>grep -i Valid-Until -r .
zsh: exit 2 grep -i Valid-Until -r .
What'm I missing?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Russell Coker wrote on 2010-06-05 22:30:
> On Wed, 26 May 2010, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > You're missing the point. The main selling point to management
> > is that Linux is free. If they have to buy new backup software
> > in order to accommodate Linux' backup requirements, that will
> > kill
Dear developers,
Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low.
Here the list of current circular dependencies:
* libc6 libgcc1
* perl perl-modules
* debconf debconf-english debconf-i18n
* abuse abuse-frabs abuse-lib
* ghostscript gs-common
* python-imaging python-imaging-tk
* o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: stephan gorget
* Package name: clustershell
Version : 1.2.83
Upstream Author : Stephane Thiell
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/clustershell/
* License : CeCILL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : An
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:53:08AM +, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> The lack of a suitable (i.e. non-buggy) mingw32 cross-compiler has blocked
> Wine updates for half a year now. Both the mingw32 package (gcc 4.2.1) and
> the gcc-mingw32 package (gcc 4.4.2) have a bug which was fixed in upstream
> gcc 4.
Good day
I am Bassam hadi from saudi arabia,Riyadh capital city. I have bachelor
in information technolgy.
I prefered linux OS as I can review IT courses from daily usage.
I have ubuntu & debian distributions , and I want to know is
(universities -*.iso filetypes)
Contact me t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Asias He
* Package name: ibus-table-others
Version : 1.3.0.20100528
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ibus/
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : provide various tables that beyond Chinese for IBu
On Sun, 2010-06-06 at 10:28 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > - optionally /var/tmp as tmpfs
> Not an answer to your original question, just a not-so-random observation.
> /var/tmp is declared by LFS as "temporary storage that persists across
> reboots". It wont be this way if it's on tmpfs obviou
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010, Florian Weimer wrote:
> You'd have to fetch the root metadata from a trusted server over
> something like HTTPS (that is, something with authentication and a
> challange-response component built in).
That wouldn't be a stupid design at all. It would also allow that root
meta
* Fernando Lemos:
> 1. Man-in-the-middle attacks between clients and security update servers
> 2. Denial-of-service attacks to the security updates infrastructure
> 3. No trusted servers for security updates for testing and unstable
>
> Using HTTPS for the security update infrastructure could solv
Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 14:50 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
> The Release file in the repository has now a Valid-Until field that
> invalidates the repository after some time without updates. This can be
> used to detect a mirror provided outdated packages.
>
> I am not sure whether APT che
31 matches
Mail list logo
