On Fr, Mai 28, 2010 at 22:49:43 (CEST), Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/28/2010 09:20 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Fr, Mai 28, 2010 at 16:00:27 (CEST), Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/28/2010 01:25 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I'm going to package rtmpdump next week.
On Fr, Mai 22, 2
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> I think the policy being applied is that if a package is only useful in
>> conjunction with non-free data, it belongs in contrib (just as if it
>> depends on some non-free library).
>
> Should I move libwww-topica-perl to contrib?
> Personally I
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I think the policy being applied is that if a package is only useful in
> conjunction with non-free data, it belongs in contrib (just as if it
> depends on some non-free library).
Should I move libwww-topica-perl to contrib?
Personally I
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 19:33 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/29/2010 03:28 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 21:14 +0200, Felix Geyer wrote:
> >> clamz [1] has been rejected from Debian NEW [2] some time ago.
> >> The FTP assistent that processed the package was of the
> >> opinio
On 05/29/2010 03:28 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 21:14 +0200, Felix Geyer wrote:
clamz [1] has been rejected from Debian NEW [2] some time ago.
The FTP assistent that processed the package was of the
opinion that it belongs to contrib instead of main because it's
only useful to
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 23:16:06 +0300, Per Lundberg wrote:
>> p...@terah:/etc/sysctl.d$ sudo netstat -l -n -p | grep 177
>> udp6 0 0 :::177 :::*
>> 1632/xdm
>>
> That's fine, bind() on in6addr_any lets
On Sat, 29 May 2010 14:40:41 -0400 (EDT), Andreas Barth wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 23:39:52 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
>>> After some discussion about lilo on #debian-devel in IRC, it has pretty
>>> much been determined that kernel sizes have crossed the line pas
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Hi Julien,
> I'm fairly sure xdmcp over ipv4 works just fine with both xdm and gdm in
> squeeze, because I tested them (and made them work with the bindv6only=1
> setting) a month or two ago.
OK, that's interesting... Just for the sake of
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 21:14 +0200, Felix Geyer wrote:
> clamz [1] has been rejected from Debian NEW [2] some time ago.
> The FTP assistent that processed the package was of the
> opinion that it belongs to contrib instead of main because it's
> only useful to download non-free content.
>
> The pur
David Kalnischkies writes:
> No. Replaces is used to say to dpkg: It is okay that this package
> overrides files of the other package - otherwise dpkg would complain
> loudly for good reasons. It doesn't say something about the
> upgrade path.
I disagree with this particular part of your analysis
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 23:16:06 +0300, Per Lundberg wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> > I'm fairly sure xdmcp over ipv4 works just fine with both xdm and gdm in
> > squeeze, because I tested them (and made them work with the bindv6only=1
> > se
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 02:17:27PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> So, we are talking about 1000 packages which are up-to-date in
> unstable currently. Bugs don't change that picture much. I consider this
> manageable during a full cycle.
>
> And frankly, arguing back and forth about this is an exerc
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 22:32:07 +0300, Per Lundberg wrote:
> >> Isn't there any XDMCP-capable server available in squeeze that can
> >> speak ipv4 any more?
I'm fairly sure xdmcp over ipv4 works just fine with both xdm and gdm in
squeeze, because I tested them (and made them work with the bindv6
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Carl Johnson wrote:
Hi Carl, and thanks for your reply!
(I'll include my full original email, since I extended the audience to
the debian-devel list as well)
> Per Lundberg writes:
>
>> Isn't there any XDMCP-capable server available in squeeze that can
>> speak
On Sat, 29 May 2010 10:51:10 -0400 (EDT), Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:42:34 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> You're missing the point. The main selling point to management
>> is that Linux is free. If they have to buy new backup software
>> in order to accommodate Linux' b
clamz [1] has been rejected from Debian NEW [2] some time ago.
The FTP assistent that processed the package was of the
opinion that it belongs to contrib instead of main because it's
only useful to download non-free content.
The purpose of clamz is to download MP3 files after buying them
from Amaz
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: chrysn
* Package name: opencsg
Version : 1.3.0
Upstream Author : Florian Kirsch
* URL : http://opencsg.org/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : image-based CSG (Constructive Solid Geometry) lib
* Stephen Powell (zlinux...@wowway.com) [100523 21:21]:
> On Sat, 22 May 2010 23:39:52 -0400 (EDT), William Pitcock wrote:
> > After some discussion about lilo on #debian-devel in IRC, it has pretty
> > much been determined that kernel sizes have crossed the line past where
> > lilo can reliably de
Den 29. mai 2010 17:51, skrev Julien Cristau:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 16:09:25 +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Den 23. mai 2010 15:47, skrev Ove Kaaven:
Is it okay if I go ahead and do such a NMU?
Well, since there have been no objections for a week, I guess I'll go ahead.
I had been ready for som
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 16:09:25 +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Den 23. mai 2010 15:47, skrev Ove Kaaven:
> >Is it okay if I go ahead and do such a NMU?
>
> Well, since there have been no objections for a week, I guess I'll go ahead.
>
> I had been ready for some feedback from the mingw32 maintainer
On Wed, 26 May 2010 23:43:12 +0100, Stephen Gran
wrote:
>This one time, at band camp, Roger Leigh said:
>> How will adduser cope with group addition; does it skip UIDs until
>> it finds an unused unique UID/GID pair?
>
>That certainly is the only approach that makes sense - it has the
>benefit of
On Thu, 27 May 2010 21:36:17 +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq
wrote:
>On 27/05/2010 21:17, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> I wasn't around for the libc5 => libc6 transition, but my understanding
>> is it was larger than 20% of the archive. I would guesstimate the
>> removal of /usr/X11R6 at being around t
On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:42:34 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell
wrote:
>You're missing the point. The main selling point to management
>is that Linux is free. If they have to buy new backup software
>in order to accommodate Linux' backup requirements, that will
>kill it on the spot. Whatever boot load
On Wed, 26 May 2010 18:42:50 +0200, Michael Banck
wrote:
>Eh, Debian can patch upstream software if it thinks it is necessary for
>inter-operation, that's the one of the major points of having a
>distribution.
This is not always liked by the upstream communities though. For
example, the exim com
On Sun, 23 May 2010 16:26:48 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli
wrote:
>On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 02:08:59PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>> This also means that the grub2 maintainers (both Debian and Upstream)
>> need to work on the regressions that exist in regard to moving from
>> lilo or grub "legacy" to gru
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:45:30PM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:47:47PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > How many packages are we talking about here? Is there a way to get the
> > number of packages that have the same version in Lenny and Squeeze?
>
> According to a quick qu
Den 23. mai 2010 15:47, skrev Ove Kaaven:
Is it okay if I go ahead and do such a NMU?
Well, since there have been no objections for a week, I guess I'll go ahead.
I had been ready for some feedback from the mingw32 maintainers like
"we're working on an updated mingw32, just wait a bit", or "g
David Kalnischkies writes:
> 2010/5/28 Stephen Leake :
>> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>>
>>> Stephen Leake wrote:
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> The reason for all this is that when a package libX2-dev Conflicts:
>>> with
> and Replaces: a package libX1-dev, aptitude does not remove libX1-dev
Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>>> So far this is independent of third packages which is IMHO fine and
>>> desirable. So far, this could be solved by a postfix-conf.d-snippet
>>> shipped with the amavis package.
>> Quite not. You also need
On 2010-05-26 00:18:23 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> You're getting things the wrong way around. The version of dash that
> will be put in experimental will be the correct one, the one in unstable
> will be the crippled one. The reason things fails isn't because of
> dash, but because of sloppy
On Fri, 28 May 2010 16:44:11 -0400 (EDT), Peter Samuelson wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> It *does* recognize lilo and has special logic to patch lilo after
>> the restore so that the machine will boot.
>
> So can this software be fooled into thinking it is dealing with lilo?
> Would it be suffi
[Harald Braumann]
> Why would you create such a mixed system? I don't see a usecase for
> that.
You should not really allow your lack of imagination to limit what
computer systems can handle. :)
Here at the University of Oslo, the user database is probably 25 years
old, and some users have priva
Thank you Harald for scrutinizing.
Am Fri, 28 May 2010 14:50:27 +0200
schrieb Harald Braumann:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:30:25AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
> > I'm not sure yet, if I do properly understand the point when/why
> > relaxing conditionally is a bad idea. To me, setting *fixed* um
33 matches
Mail list logo
