DECKS, ROOFS, PAINTING, KITCHENS, BATHS, BASEMENTS, PLUMBING,ELECTRICAL,
FENCES, WINDOWS, FURNACES, HOT-WATER TANKS, CLEAN UPS AND EVERYTHING ELSE!!
Schedule all of your spring and summer projects now and save big YOURWAY
Properties, Inc is a full service home and business remodeling compa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
Owner: Steffen Moeller
Package name: libclean-crypto-java
Version : 1
Upstream Author : Chris Grzegorczyk
URL :
https://code.launchpad.net/~chris-grze/eucalyptus-commons-ext/clean-crypto
License :
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libkinosearch1-perl
Version : 1.00
Upstream Author : Marvin Humphrey
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/KinoSearch1/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Aloe
Owner: Francesco Aloe
* Package name: CherryTree
Version : 0.9.6
Upstream Author : Giuseppe Penone
* URL : http://open.vitaminap.it/en/cherrytree.htm
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descript
Le mercredi 05 mai 2010 à 12:18 +0200, Simon Richter a écrit :
> Gtk would also need to include the SONAME from glib into their own,
> given that ABI breaks in glib also implicitly break their own ABI.
The GTK+ ABI stability guarantees are the same as the GLib ones. The
SONAMEs can only be changed
On 05/05/2010 09:18, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2010-05-04, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> On 27/04/2010 13:43, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>> On Apr 27, Simon Huggins wrote:
Anyway, is there a reason that #560238 isn't blocked by #560044 given it
breaks that package or are you not bothered about bre
Hi,
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 11:51:09AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> A lot of gtk headers use GObjectClass types, macros and such, which are
> from Glib. You thus need both glib headers and libraries.
Gtk would also need to include the SONAME from glib into their own,
given that ABI breaks in
Hendrik Sattler, le Wed 05 May 2010 10:47:24 +0200, a écrit :
> Zitat von Josselin Mouette :
>
> >Le mardi 04 mai 2010 à 10:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> >>Sorry I don't know what you're talking about. If you can explain it
> >> I'll try to
> >>look at the problem.
> >
> >It’s not
Zitat von Josselin Mouette :
Le mardi 04 mai 2010 à 10:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
Sorry I don't know what you're talking about. If you can explain it
I'll try to
look at the problem.
It’s not a problem, it’s a disagreement over a design choice.
When you do that:
#i
BODY {
MARGIN: 0px
}
Stéphane Glondu writes:
> Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
>> And you usually need root access for invoke-rc.d or /etc/init.d scripts
>> (unless you have some kind of specific sudo permissions for that). So
>> you might be able to kill other process as well.
>
> I guess one (be it a human operator o
On 2010-05-04, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On 27/04/2010 13:43, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> On Apr 27, Simon Huggins wrote:
>>> Anyway, is there a reason that #560238 isn't blocked by #560044 given it
>>> breaks that package or are you not bothered about breaking non-free
>>> software?
>> Nobody bothered
12 matches
Mail list logo
