[ It sucks to have to confirm mails for debian-package-d...@list.smarden.org ]
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > What happened to the idea of having /bin/sh -> dash hardcoded in the dash
> > package instead ?
>
> That's still the plan. The problem is that once dash is the only
> pa
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 592 (new: 6)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 140 (new: 9)
Total number of packages request
Package: wnpp
Owner: Chris Butler
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtest-inter-perl
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Sullivan Beck
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Inter/
* License
Raphael Geissert writes:
> That's still the plan. The problem is that once dash is the only package
> shipping /bin/sh, bash would be the one prompting the user whether
> she/he wants to use bash (so that the diversion is added) it would still
> break in case the user already added a local divers
On 29 April 2010 14:23, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Any dpkg maintainer reading? Raphaël? Guillem?
>
> Yes, but I don't know what you expect from me. That discussion dragged for
> far too long in too many directions.
Hum, ok. That's why I didn't CC the
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Any dpkg maintainer reading? Raphaël? Guillem?
Yes, but I don't know what you expect from me. That discussion dragged for
far too long in too many directions.
What happened to the idea of having /bin/sh -> dash hardcoded in the dash
package instead ?
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov
* Package name: goban
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Scott Draves
* URL : http://draves.org/goban/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Goban screensaver
Replays historical games of go
Hi Ben,
On 29 April 2010 12:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:24:32AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> [...]
>> A quick workaround to bypass the check, in case you want to upload
>> already, would be to: ddivert=dpkg; ddivert="${ddivert}-divert";
>> $ddivert --remove ...
>>
>>
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Debian BTS seems to be on vacation. For how long?
lindberg (one of the machines in the BTS dns rotation) blew up
temporarily,[1] and thanks to the work of the DSA, has already been
fixed.
If this happens in the future, you can always use one of th
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 27, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> But you're breaking peoples' systems *now*. And breaking systems
> Which ones? There is only one bug open (gdm) and it has patches.
>
> Based on this data I believe that the change has been a great suc
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:24:32AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
[...]
> A quick workaround to bypass the check, in case you want to upload
> already, would be to: ddivert=dpkg; ddivert="${ddivert}-divert";
> $ddivert --remove ...
>
> [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=users/geissert/dash.git;a=summary
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 18:33:58 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> So the question is then if you care about kernels without ipv6
> support. If getaddrinfo() returns an ipv6 address and you
> don't go over the list, you have a problem.
>
gdm first calls getaddrinfo() with hints.ai_family == AF_INET6.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 07:46:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 18:59:16 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > I didn't look at the source, but if it's already using
> > getaddrinfo() and going over all the addresses it returned,
> > I don't see why it should be broken with eit
On 28 April 2010 16:08, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:20:12PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> On 15 April 2010 12:58, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>> I tried to clone your git repository but it 404s, so I can't check
>> what other changes you've made so far and see if there's any confli
>
> Who said that libpthread will be replaced? I read it that it interfaces with
> libpthread, i.e. it wraps it.
>
I have taken a look to the source code and for POSIX system uses
libpthread and wraps it. Now, I'm developing a distributed application
which uses both a pthreaded library and libzth
Hi,
after some days the poll [1] has been a clear result. browser-plugin-*
has won with a huge winning margin.
[1] http://www.doodle.com/guafbbhipwskzr8a
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital si
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas"
* Package name: libdatetime-format-dbi-perl
Version : 0.33
Upstream Author : Claus Faerber
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-DBI/
* License : GPL+Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl
De
On 2010-04-29, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> On 29/04/2010 11:13, Cleto Martin Angelina wrote:
>>> Especially if it is not compatible with glibc and all other libraries (ie if
>>> it does not provide the current libpthread ABI). [I did not check if this is
>>> the case or not]
>> I don't know what I sh
On 29/04/2010 11:13, Cleto Martin Angelina wrote:
>> Especially if it is not compatible with glibc and all other libraries (ie if
>> it does not provide the current libpthread ABI). [I did not check if this is
>> the case or not]
>
> I don't know what I should to do for checking that issue in the
> Debian BTS seems to be on vacation. For how long?
It's not down, but HTTP access is extremely slow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201004291147.280
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Cleto Martin Angelina
wrote:
>> You're missing the important bit here:
>> Version 2.3.2 was released on 03/13/05.
>
>> What about not packaging *that* at all?
>
> It is true zthreads library is apparently abandoned by the original
> author. But me and my workmates
Global Water Challenge
Beda Venerabilis' Easter cycle
_
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?oc
> * Package name: zthreads
> libzthreads?
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Cleto Martin Angelina
> Owner: Cleto Martin Angelina
>
'zthreads' was the name of the source package I thought for the first
time. There is no matter to change it to 'libzthreads'.
>> Programming Lang:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 01:40:53PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 27, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>
> > reasonable commenter), and now you're saying that Julien Cristau is "the
> > peanut gallery".
> No, I am not.
>
> > But you're breaking peoples' systems *now*. And breaking systems
> Which
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:11:01AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:09, Stanislav Maslovski
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Debian BTS seems to be on vacation. For how long?
>
> http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/bugs.debian.org
I can ping it:
PING bugs.debian.org (86.59.118.149)
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:09, Stanislav Maslovski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Debian BTS seems to be on vacation. For how long?
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/bugs.debian.org
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debia
Hi,
Debian BTS seems to be on vacation. For how long?
--
Stanislav
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100429080919.ga17...@kaiba.homelan
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:09 PM, James Y Knight wrote:
>
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:32 AM, James Y Knight wrote:
>>
>> After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across one
>> example of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is GPLv2-only, and is
>> linked against GPLv3 libread
28 matches
Mail list logo
