Bug#578580: ITP: skipfish -- A fully automated, active web application security reconnaissance tool

2010-04-20 Thread Martin Meredith
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Martin Meredith * Package name: skipfish Version : 1.32b Upstream Author : Michal Zalewski * URL : http://code.google.com/p/skipfish * License : Apache Programming Lang: C Description : A fully automated, active

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

2010-04-20 Thread Xavier Vello
Le Tuesday 20 April 2010 01:33:37, Russ Allbery a écrit : > Why not put both a banner on the document and set the no-print flag to > force a prompt at printing time? Defense in depth is almost always a good > idea. There's a configuration option in KPDF (and okular, its KDE4 version) saying "obe

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

2010-04-20 Thread Russ Allbery
Salvo Tomaselli writes: > In my opinion, the more safety checks there are, the more stupid the > users become. Without safety they have to be awake and careful to what > they are doing. It depends on how frequent the action that you're wrapping in a safety check is. Deleting files, absolutely.

Bug#578518: RFP: libmojolicious-perl -- A next generation web framework for the Perl programming language.

2010-04-20 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name : libmojolicious-perl Version : 0.24 Upstream Author : Sebastian Riedel * License : Artistic License version 2.0 * URL : http:

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

2010-04-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 20 avril 2010 à 12:37 +0200, Salvo Tomaselli a écrit : > In my opinion, the more safety checks there are, the more stupid the users > become. > Without safety they have to be awake and careful to what they are doing. I’ve witnessed the exact opposite. The more stupid users are, the more

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

2010-04-20 Thread Salvo Tomaselli
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 12:16:26 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > One sometimes tries to print PDF without reading them first. This > is not with a PDF viewer, more with a printing utility such as lpr, > though. At least such utilities should honor the printable flag (in > order to protect the *user* from

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

2010-04-20 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2010-04-19 18:05:30 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > The reasons not to want a document printed are quite easy to > understand, but the mechanism is flawed. Given the setting you > mention, you can just slap a red banner stating "Confidential, do not > print". If it is on a corporate setting, just st

Re: Bug#578491: ITP: bley -- intelligent greylisting daemon for Postfix

2010-04-20 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:27:59AM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Evgeni Golov > Owner: Evgeni Golov > > * Package name: bley > Version : 0.1 > Upstream Author : Evgeni Golov > * URL : http://bley.mx > * License : BSD

Bug#578491: ITP: bley -- intelligent greylisting daemon for Postfix

2010-04-20 Thread Evgeni Golov
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Evgeni Golov Owner: Evgeni Golov * Package name: bley Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Evgeni Golov * URL : http://bley.mx * License : BSD Programming Lang: Python Description : intelligent greylisting daemon for