Quoting Tomasz Muras (tom...@muras.eu):
> Hi,
>
> Hopefully a very quick questions (please CC me in response):
> * should I use cdebconf for new packages, or debconf?
Well, as Neil already answered: none of these. Your package should
work with both. If you're using debhelper, that's easy to achie
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: libspring-security-2.0-java
Version : 2.0.5
Upstream Author : SpringSource Inc.
* URL : http://static.springsource.org/spring-security/site/
* License : Apache-2.0
On Apr 11, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > It is not just ugly, it is also stupid because it means that existing
> > configurations will not work anymore depending on the installed kernel.
> I don't get this one...
> Why shouldn't they work with a different kernel?
After months, you *still* do not und
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:41:20 +0100
Tomasz Muras wrote:
> Hopefully a very quick questions (please CC me in response):
> * should I use cdebconf for new packages, or debconf?
> * is there any documentation for cdebconf available?
The protocol works equally with debconf or cdebconf. As far as the
Hi,
Hopefully a very quick questions (please CC me in response):
* should I use cdebconf for new packages, or debconf?
* is there any documentation for cdebconf available?
cheers and thanks!
Tomek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Roberto Lumbreras
Owner: Roberto Lumbreras
* Package name: browserlauncher2
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Jeff Chapman
* URL : http://browserlaunch2.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Descripti
> It is not just ugly, it is also stupid because it means that existing
> configurations will not work anymore depending on the installed kernel.
I don't get this one...
Why shouldn't they work with a different kernel?
It's obvious that if a program starts to support IPv6 at some point, something
On Apr 11, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> They don't *need* to do that. It can just be documented that if you use
> IPv6, you need to use the v4-in-v6-mapped syntaxis.
>
> Granted, that's a bit ugly, but it does work.
It is not just ugly, it is also stupid because it means that existing
configurations
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder"
Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder"
* Package name: libfusioninventory-agent-task-netdiscovery-perl
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : David Durieux
* URL : http://www.FusionInventory.org
* License : GPLv2+
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Angel Abad
Owner: Angel Abad
* Package name: python-tweepy
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Josh Roesslein
* URL : http://github.com/joshthecoder/tweepy
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Pyt
On Sunday 11 April 2010 12:42:01 Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> They don't *need* to do that. It can just be documented that if you use
> IPv6, you need to use the v4-in-v6-mapped syntaxis.
IMHO i think that using the mapped syntax can bring some consistency rather
than having logs and configuration fi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Stapelberg
* Package name: libanyevent-i3-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Michael Stapelberg
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/AnyEvent-I3/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Descri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "أحمد المحمودي"
* Package name: ttf-thabit
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Khaled Hosny
* URL : http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot
* License : OFL
Programming Lang: N/A
Description : fixed width Op
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 04:14:57PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 08, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>
> > I also don't really see the issues with bindv6only=0. If you listen on
> > all interfaces, it makes is easier. If you only listen on specific
> > interfaces, it's not in the way.
> This is
14 matches
Mail list logo
