Goswin von Brederlow writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:32:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> Having package.checksums be GPG-signed will take a significant change
>>> in our infrastructure (buildd hosts, for instance, would need to have
>>> a way to sign checksums files as well), so it's
Harald Braumann writes:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:32:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>
>> Having package.checksums be GPG-signed will take a significant change in
>> our infrastructure (buildd hosts, for instance, would need to have a way
>> to sign checksums files as well), so it's not go
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 585 (new: 22)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 131 (new: 3)
Total number of packages reques
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastian Reichel
* Package name: valaswig
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : pancake
* URL : http://hg.youterm.com/valaswig/summary
* License : GPLv3
Programming Lang: Vala
Description : generate swig interface fil
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:37:39PM +0100, Merciadri Luca wrote:
>
>
>> From http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/tip/16726.html, it appears to
>> be possible to show the weather forecast. This seems to rely heavily (if
>> not entirely) on www.weather.com. However
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:37:39PM +0100, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> From http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/tip/16726.html, it appears to
> be possible to show the weather forecast. This seems to rely heavily (if
> not entirely) on www.weather.com. However, despite the fact that I am
> not in Franc
Hi,
From http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/tip/16726.html, it appears to
be possible to show the weather forecast. This seems to rely heavily (if
not entirely) on www.weather.com. However, despite the fact that I am
not in France, but in Belgium (which is pretty the same for the weather
and regi
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> /dev/something just feels so wrong. /dev contains block and character
> devices, and almost nothing else (except some udev and initramfs files)
Not really. There's the whole /dev/shm crap (which one is not supposed to
access directly anyway).
> Why shoul
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov
Package name: trac-datefieldplugin
Version : 0.7772
Upstream Author : Noah Kantrowitz
URL : http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/DateFieldPlugin
License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Add cu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: Tzafrir Cohen
* Package Name: rbtools
Version : 0.2-rc2
Upstream Author : Christian Hammond, David Trowbridge
* URL : http://www.reviewboard.org/
* License : MIT
* Programming L
Hi all!
Currently irrlicht released a new minor version which I want to
upload to debian. Concerning the ABI the only relecvant change is the
removal of 4 symbols which are template instantiations.
I can, of course, force instantiation of these templates but that
feels quite like
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 11. März 2010, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > python-apt in lenny and squeeze still depend on lsb-release, which is
> > extra. The version in sid (migration due in 5 days) only recommends it.
>
> python-apt 0.7.93.2 migrated to testing.
So the time is right for promoting apt-li
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:14:56PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 26. Januar 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > All in all (and unless I've missed something), the choice seems to be
> > relatively self contained. We would "just" need to promote to standard
> > python-support a
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:44:03AM -0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any good documentation about best practices for OpenPGP key
> management? I plan to use gnupg (gpg), as it's conventional and seems like
> the "best of breed" these days.
>
> Most documentation I've found seems si
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:32:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> Having package.checksums be GPG-signed will take a significant change in
> our infrastructure (buildd hosts, for instance, would need to have a way
> to sign checksums files as well), so it's not going to happen
> tomorrow.
I was
I don't have a doc available per se, but my own practices are mentioned
in the key policy doc that I embed when I sign someone's key. It's
available at http://undergrid.net/legal/gpg/ for the current version.
The highlights are basically that I have 2 separate USB drives with
encry
Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any good documentation about best practices for OpenPGP key
> management? I plan to use gnupg (gpg), as it's conventional and seems like
> the "best of breed" these days.
>
> Most documentation I've found seems significantly out of date (including
> long d
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fladischer Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: importlib
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Brett Cannon
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/importlib/
* License : Python Software Found
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:46:57 +
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> > *Precisely* what changes do you need for that "architecture" - is it
> > really a different architecture from armel? (Answers to debian-embedded
> > please.)
>
> h
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> *Precisely* what changes do you need for that "architecture" - is it
> really a different architecture from armel? (Answers to debian-embedded
> please.)
hi neil,
firstly thank you for the informative post, esp. the history about
actually
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:13:31AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Wouter Verhelst]
> > At any rate, a PGP signature takes a lot of data; much more so than
> > a checksum. It's therefore more economical to produce a signed
> > package.checksums file than it is to produce a package.pgpsigs.
>
Williams Orellana
We have a mutual friend on Skoost and I'd like to add you as my friend, Akki
Pat.
To confirm, follow the link below:
http://www.skoost.com/social/?pid=5940686&eml=debian-de...@lists.debian.org&fid=6712232&blk=0&pge=12
Skoost
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 00:37 +, The Fungi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:22:00PM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> > I made some tests, and it seems that we could allow,but not require, GPG
> > signed checksum-file. sha256sum will ignore invalid lines by default
> > (unless you specify --warn
Williams Orellana
We have a mutual friend on Skoost and I'd like to add you as my friend, Mattu
Jaat.
To confirm, follow the link below:
http://www.skoost.com/social/?pid=5940686&eml=debian-de...@lists.debian.org&fid=5725195&blk=0&pge=12
Skoost
Williams Orellana
We have a mutual friend on Skoost and I'd like to add you as my friend, Seo
Soumik.
To confirm, follow the link below:
http://www.skoost.com/social/?pid=5940686&eml=debian-de...@lists.debian.org&fid=109850273&blk=0&pge=12
Skoost
25 matches
Mail list logo
