Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luke Faraone
* Package name: pianobar
Version : 20100222.git6805c07
Upstream Author : Lars-Dominik Braun
* URL : http://6xq.net/0017
* License : MIT/X11 (BSD like)
Programming Lang: C
Description : console based
Hi!
As no opposing arguments were brought up I went ahead and now both
changes are in dpkg's git tree.
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 00:15:10 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> First, I'd like to change the dpkg Pre-Depends from lzma to xz-utils,
> the latter is a bit bigger in size (lzma 172 KiB; xz-utils 50
Hi!
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 22:51:55 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I don't have any objections to this, but I'd strongly suggest that
> this get a run-through experimental with an announcement on
> -devel-announce to request testing so that any really bad problems are
> caught before it gets deploye
Hi!
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 04:49:06 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I'd like to know if people would strongly miss being able to
> background dpkg on the conffile prompt (‘Z’), instead of starting a
> new subshell. The latter is the default with most modern frontends
> (APT based).
>
> I personally
Hi,
- "Michael Tautschnig" wrote:
> First of all, I'd like to say a big THANKS to all the people
> maintaining Xen
> within (in of course also outside) Debian; you really saved us lots of
> money and
> energy (which is both, electrical and that personal one).
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > > 4) Wha
Thank you for the conversation on this. I would like to summarize what
people have been saying -- it seems there is still a lot of disagreement
about things out there yet, and I'm not entirely certain about things
yet, but this has been helpful.
I'll include my original email with comments from p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fladischer Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: billiard
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Ask Solem
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/billiard/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Py
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> following the recent "Debian Mobile" thread on
> debian-devel@lists.debian.org, and the numerous discussions about
> packaging on meego-...@meego.com, it looks like that it would be a good
> idea to have an official Meego Working
First of all, I'd like to say a big THANKS to all the people maintaining Xen
within (in of course also outside) Debian; you really saved us lots of money and
energy (which is both, electrical and that personal one).
[...]
>
> > 4) What will be our preferred server virtualization option for non-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Al Nikolov
* Package name: blogilo
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Mehrdad Momeny
* URL : http://blogilo.gnufolks.org/
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Blogging client for KDE
Blogilo is a B
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian Glaubitz
Hi,
I would like to package qhimdtransfer for Debian which is the graphical frontend
to a library called libhimd which we also develop. libhimd is also intended for
packaging in another ITP (#533112) in Debian. Up to now, we are linking
qh
Hello,
following the recent "Debian Mobile" thread on
debian-devel@lists.debian.org, and the numerous discussions about
packaging on meego-...@meego.com, it looks like that it would be a good
idea to have an official Meego Working Group dedicated to Debian Packaging
of Meego software. So I went ah
On Feb 26, Luca Capello wrote:
> >> 5) Do we recommend that new installations of lenny or of squeeze avoid
> >> Xen for ease of upgrading to squeeze+1? If so, what should they use?
> > It depends. KVM in lenny is buggy and lacks important features. While it
> > works fine for development and cas
Hi there!
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:38:33 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 25, John Goerzen wrote:
>> 5) Do we recommend that new installations of lenny or of squeeze avoid
>> Xen for ease of upgrading to squeeze+1? If so, what should they use?
> It depends. KVM in lenny is buggy and lacks impor
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 11:58 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 26, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> > I understand the pain of maintaining Xen, but believe it is bad idea
> > to defend replacing it with kvm by claiming those needing
> > virtualization and not having servers with hardware support a
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 08:25:37PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> > UDD is the wrong approach. And also, ever looked at its
> > "db layout"?
>
> Could you elaborate?
UDD sprung to mind for me too. I'd like to know why it
doesn't fit for this use-case. I'd also be curious in an
armchair-sense to
Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> Did we ever had something "preferred"?
Not officially, but there were clearly better solutions for different
situations.
-- John
>
> Bastian
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I understand the pain of maintaining Xen, but believe it is bad idea
> to defend replacing it with kvm by claiming those needing
> virtualization and not having servers with hardware support are few
> and should just get new servers.
Agreed. At work, we made a major p
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 02:13:48PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/doc-base-unknown-section.html
>
> Where should I fill a bug for that ?
See the bottom of the page:
" Please send all comments about these web pages to the Lintian
maintainers."
Regards,
Patri
Hi there,
I am looking at the page:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/doc-base-unknown-section.html
Clearly the line (and the href) is bogus:
"Refer to Debian doc-base Manual section 2.3.3 (The section field) for
details. "
Where should I fill a bug for that ?
Thanks,
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSU
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 at 11:21:08 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Post-upload corrections?
I assume Charles refers to this practice: imagine I maintained hello, and
uploaded upstream release 6.6 without initially realising that it contained
a security fix:
hello (6.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
On Feb 26, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Wow, logic. Because they don't have monetary resources to buy new
> servers they have a vast amount of time instead?
Why should they expect other people to solve their problems for them?
Free software is not about other people working in your place.
--
ciao,
Ma
On 2010-02-26, Charles Plessy wrote:
> If the developments on changelog parsing introduce new requirements, in
> particular limitations on post-upload corrections, I strongly recommend to
> document this in our Policy.
Post-upload corrections?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On 2010-02-26, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 26, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> I understand the pain of maintaining Xen, but believe it is bad idea
>> to defend replacing it with kvm by claiming those needing
>> virtualization and not having servers with hardware support are few
>> and should just
On Feb 26, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I understand the pain of maintaining Xen, but believe it is bad idea
> to defend replacing it with kvm by claiming those needing
> virtualization and not having servers with hardware support are few
> and should just get new servers.
Obviously these people
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:18:41AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> But the pv-ops xen kernel is shaping up well and that is what Bastian
> Banks is working on. They have a proper upstream and follow the latest
> vanilla kernel well enough. According to the wiki the plan is to have
> pv-ops me
Hi,
1) in Lenny I use the Xen hypervisor 3.4 from Squeeze, so it works.
The main problem is that the linux dom0 patch is not (yet) upstream, and
Debian can't really maintain it.
But we hope, it will be accepted upstream, a lot of works have be done.
As you can see on the Xen wiki
http://wiki.x
"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:53:56PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> There was a thread here a little while back about the status of Xen in
>> future Debian releases. It left me rather confused, and I'm hoping to
>> find some answers (which I will then
Marco d'Itri, le Fri 26 Feb 2010 02:38:33 +0100, a écrit :
> On Feb 25, John Goerzen wrote:
> > 3a) What about Linux virtualization on servers that lack hardware
> > virtualization support, which Xen supports but KVM doesn't?
> Tough luck.
>
> > 6) Are we communicating this to Debian users in som
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:53:56PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> "Xen - Provides para-virtualization and full-virtualization. Mostly used
> on servers. Will be abandoned after squeeze."
> The Xen page on the wiki makes no mention of this.
Well, I don't know where this conclusion comes from. But usu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philipp Huebner
* Package name: python-netio230a
Upstream Author : Philipp Klaus
* URL : http://github.com/pklaus/netio230a
* License : GPL 3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : software to control the Koukaam NETIO-23
31 matches
Mail list logo
