On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 08:53 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > The primary one I'm unhappy with is its deleting part of the upstream
> > tarball with (AFAIK) no warning and no control. (That is, if upstream
> > have a debian dir, it gets nuked, rather than us collaborating on it).
>
> That's a fea
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:25 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >
> > > This wiki page still misses a "Disadvantages of new format"
> > section.
> >
> > It's a wiki, feel free to add it. I know some people unhappy with the
> > new
> > format but I do
On Feb 20, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> source 3.0 (quilt) is still missing tools to make it working out of the box.
> If you quilt not only in debian packages its fucking annoying that you need
> to change to patch of your patches from patches/ to debian/patches depending
> on what you are working on
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:05:41PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Dmitry E. Oboukhov (un...@debian.org):
> > PW> As an example of the practical effects of flags in the context of
> > PW> Debian; a number of years ago we lost our kernel maintainer, partially
> > PW> because KDE in Debian
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmoosex-types-json-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Michael Langner
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types-JSO
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:02:24PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The reason would be size. I don't see anything else there.
> For network based boots, specifically high performance cluster, the size
> can make a real difference. When you turn the cluster on it is not just
> one system downl
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:25 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > This wiki page still misses a "Disadvantages of new format"
> section.
>
> It's a wiki, feel free to add it. I know some people unhappy with the
> new
> format but I don't know many technical disadvantages.
The primary one I'm unh
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In the process of converting my packages to the new 3.0 source format,
> I'd like to log somewhere that a certain patch was applied for the
> first time in a certain debian version of a given package.
>
> Is there a DEP3 header for that, or m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joenio Costa
* Package name: libstatistics-online-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Francesco Nidito
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Statistics-OnLine/
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
D
Hello.
In the process of converting my packages to the new 3.0 source format,
I'd like to log somewhere that a certain patch was applied for the
first time in a certain debian version of a given package.
Is there a DEP3 header for that, or maybe such information is not
supposed to be in the patch
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com>
* Package name: enforcer
Version : 1.0~beta2
Upstream Author : Brian Fox
* URL : http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: java
Description :
On 2010-02-20, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> For network based boots, specifically high performance cluster, the size
> can make a real difference. When you turn the cluster on it is not just
> one system downloading an extra meg but 100+ nodes. That largely
> increases the network collisions, err
Hi Alexander.
Excerpts from Alexander Wirt's message of Sáb Fev 20 10:07:55 -0200 2010:
> Alexander Wirt schrieb am Saturday, den 20. February 2010:
(...)
> > > > >http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0#WhyshouldIconvertmypackageto3.0.28quilt.29format.3F
> > > >
> And the last thing I want to
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri Feb 19, 2010 at 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using
On Feb 20, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've seen this for other safety-critical tools, e.g. the dar backup tool
> which comes both as "dar" and "dar-static". I personally don't believe
> there would be *much* use of "dpkg-static", but having it around for a
> release would enable to see if/how ma
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Things would be much easier for starters if dpkg would ship its own patch
> helpers like push, pop and create patch. A 3.0 format which is working out of
> the box without installing quilt and without the need to set QUILT_PATCHES
> would be a real bene
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Dittberner
* Package name: virtualenvwrapper
Version : 1.24.2
Upstream Author : Doug Hellmann
* URL : http://www.doughellmann.com/projects/virtualenvwrapper/
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 09:25:14 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I don't see any valid reason to convert packages which already use a
> > patch system such as dpatch to the new thing. Debian is in dire need
> > of manpower taking care of our core infrastructure, converting
> > dpatch-based packages to q
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:02:24PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Michael Tokarev writes:
> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> I googled a bit and found this old mail about a klibc only initramfs:
> >>
> >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/07/msg00400.html
> >>
> >> I would reall
Alexander Wirt schrieb am Saturday, den 20. February 2010:
> Mike Hommey schrieb am Saturday, den 20. February 2010:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 09:03:10AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
> > > wrote:
> > > >On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wro
On Feb 20, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> For network based boots, specifically high performance cluster, the size
> can make a real difference. When you turn the cluster on it is not just
> one system downloading an extra meg but 100+ nodes. That largely
> increases the network collisions, errors
Mike Hommey schrieb am Saturday, den 20. February 2010:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 09:03:10AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
> > wrote:
> > >On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wro
Hi,
On Fri Feb 19, 2010 at 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using the new source
> > > formats "3.0 (quilt)" and "3.0 (na
Michael Tokarev writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I googled a bit and found this old mail about a klibc only initramfs:
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/07/msg00400.html
>>
>> I would really like to do this and it has been close to 4 years since
>> that mail. B
Hi all,
I'm in the process of packaging the 1.4 branch of symfony [1], [2], an
open source php framework for creating web applications. It embeds
copies of code of php-based software not present in the archive, in
particular propel, doctrine, swift and phing. I am currently working
in one of them
Stefan Fritsch writes:
> On Saturday 20 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> > I don't see any valid reason to convert packages which already
>> > use a patch system such as dpatch to the new thing. Debian is in
>> > dire need of manpower taking care of our core infrastructure,
>> > converting dp
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I googled a bit and found this old mail about a klibc only initramfs:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2006/07/msg00400.html
>
> I would really like to do this and it has been close to 4 years since
> that mail. But it doesn't look like there has be
On Saturday 20 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I don't see any valid reason to convert packages which already
> > use a patch system such as dpatch to the new thing. Debian is in
> > dire need of manpower taking care of our core infrastructure,
> > converting dpatch-based packages to quilt is
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:15:10AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> First, I'd like to change the dpkg Pre-Depends from lzma to xz-utils,
> the latter is a bit bigger in size (lzma 172 KiB; xz-utils 504 KiB,
> 160 KiB in share/doc/ and liblzma2 304 KiB, 124 KiB in share/doc/) but
This just seems the
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 09:03:10AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
> wrote:
> >On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using
Marc Haber writes:
> I don't see any valid reason to convert packages which already use a
> patch system such as dpatch to the new thing. Debian is in dire need
> of manpower taking care of our core infrastructure, converting
> dpatch-based packages to quilt is a total waste of manpower.
This ig
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:51:11 +0100, Raphael Hertzog
wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:08:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> > * More than 1000 source packages[4] are already using the new source
>> > formats "3.0 (quilt)" and "3.0 (native)". Have
32 matches
Mail list logo
