Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Dear Robert and everybody,
The native package doc-central looks abandonned by its listed maintainer,
Guilherme de S. Pastore (gpastore), whose last upload was four years ago. It
currently has 298 popcon users, and has been updated two times in NMU by Robert
Luberda
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Description: Debian shared library package building helper scripts
Shared library packages in Debian need some special catering to do
with regards to which files go where. This package contains
programs which try to help automate the process and catch simple
err
HI Dear,
please add my ID for Link Ex.
i have new Back links.
--
*Best Regards*
Anika
(¨`•.•´¨) Always
`•.¸(¨`•.•´¨) Keep
(¨`•.•´¨)¸.•´ Smiling!
`•.¸.•´
Thank you Very much.:)
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:38:42AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 06:14:15PM -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > reading your message made me worry that the ftp team were moving the
> > line for archive acceptance without discussion, when reading the bug log
> > shows that
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:11:23PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> > The current practice is that verbatim is not a clearly defined term and
> > people are using a common-sense, and imprecise, definition.
> Then let's face the comp
Le Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:11:23PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> The current practice is that verbatim is not a clearly defined term and
> people are using a common-sense, and imprecise, definition.
Then let's face the complex reality and document what you described in the
Policy. What is sure
Charles Plessy writes:
> Le Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:48:39PM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
>> Especially in combination with your later points (that the copyright
>> notices can't be “corrected”, which I take to imply that aggregation
>> and re-phrasing of the notices is also verboten), there seems
Le Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 02:48:39PM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
>
> Especially in combination with your later points (that the copyright
> notices can't be “corrected”, which I take to imply that aggregation and
> re-phrasing of the notices is also verboten), there seems to be little
> point reprod
package: wnpp
severity: wishlist
owner: hartm...@debian.org
name: krb5-appl
URL: http://web.mit.edu/kerberos/dist/krb5-appl
License: MIT Kerberos license
(roughly MIT license plus a requirement that if you modify the
software you must mark it as modified)
description: Contains fairly anci
Le Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 06:14:15PM -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> reading your message made me worry that the ftp team were moving the
> line for archive acceptance without discussion, when reading the bug log
> shows that they're simply trying to determine on which side of the existing
> line
This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format.
If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails.
You can read the original version online:
http://ymlp129.com/zrcVPo
-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul McEnery
* Package name: ipheth
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Diego Giagio
Upstream Author : Daniel Borca
* URL : http://giagio.com/wiki/moin.cgi/iPhoneEthernetDriver
* License : (GPL, BSD)
Programming Lang:
Witam!
Chcia³bym spytaæ czy istnieje mo¿liwoæ, aby wysy³aæ do Ciebie informacje o
zmianach w serwisie kartkowo.net - serwis umo¿liwia otrzymywanie kartek
pocztowych za darmo od innych u¿ytkowników serwisu. Oczywicie nie musisz siê
zgadzaæ na otrzymywanie mailingu - wtedy po prostu nie odpowiad
On 20.01.10 23:04, Martin Koegler wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:06:21PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 21:04:30 +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
I need pthsem, so I only want a working version with all features I
need.
All I care about is that there is an agreement between
22.01.2010 16:41, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Hi,
my naïve questions for today :
1) is graphicsmagick really better than imagemagick ?
it advertises it's twice as fast, scales better, and 'contains'
imagemagick.
This fork was created primarily for legal/licensing reasons.
2) if so, why graphicsmagick
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mats Erik Andersson
* Package name: libcache-historical-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Mike Schilli
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Cache-Historical/
* License : GPL or Artistic
Programming Lang: Perl
Desc
tangke writes:
> On 2010å¹´01æ20æ¥ 23:39, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Norbert Preining writes:
>>
>>
>>> On Mo, 28 Dez 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>>
> Mind that git-buildpackage with normal 1.0 source format does NOT pollute
> the git repository, so my expectation is t
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> If I had unapplied all patches of debian/patches and later I start with
> debuild, then dpkg-source works with the unpatched sources - it doesn't
> apply the patches as in format 1.0. Is there a chance that dpkg-source
> see the patches and can recogniz
Hello,
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, tangke wrote:
> > why not apply the patches when build automatically,
>
> This is the case when you build the source package (i.e. dpkg-source does
> it if it was not yet done).
>
> > and make clean to unapply the patches?
>
> The clean proc
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 2) if so, why graphicsmagick is not widely used ?
> The migration "looks" easy. I feel i'm missing something.
Probably a simple matter of mindshare and inertia. imagemagick has
been around for longer. graphicsmagick probably hasn't done enoug
Hi,
my naïve questions for today :
1) is graphicsmagick really better than imagemagick ?
it advertises it's twice as fast, scales better, and 'contains'
imagemagick.
2) if so, why graphicsmagick is not widely used ?
The migration "looks" easy. I feel i'm missing something.
Jérémy.
--
To UNS
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010, tangke wrote:
> why not apply the patches when build automatically,
This is the case when you build the source package (i.e. dpkg-source does
it if it was not yet done).
> and make clean to unapply the patches?
The clean process is controlled by the maintainer. You could in
22 matches
Mail list logo
