Hi,
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Open questions AFAICT:
> - why was the previous upload accepted? Maybe less checks being run
>at the time, e.g. not involving dpkg-source?
At one point, dak was ignoring any unpack failure reported by dpkg-source.
That was the case until some
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Elliot Murphy
This bug report is about my intent to package python-whisper,
which is a part of the graphite project:
http://graphite.wikidot.com/faq
* Package name: python-whisper
Version : 0.9.5
Upstream Author : Chris Davis
* URL
Hi Gunnar,
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 03:27:49PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> libprawn-ruby uses the 3.0 (quilt) format and is built from three
> tarballs
> (libprawn-ruby_0.7.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz,libprawn-ruby_0.7.1+dfsg.orig-pdf-inspector.tar.gz
Gunnar Wolf (04/01/2010):
> It seems the problem is reproducible on all Lenny hosts - And it is
> quite likely to be a proper bug, as the file is for some reason
> recognized as a v2.0 source package.
>
> My previous (accepted) upload was done on 2009-11-25, and dpkg-dev
> dies the same way when
[ Following up to my earlier mail sent to debian-devel - Quoting in
full for context sake ]
Gunnar Wolf dijo [Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 03:27:49PM -0600]:
> Archive Administrator dijo [Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 06:03:24PM +]:
> >
> > Reject Reasons:
> > 'dpkg-source -x' failed for libprawn-ruby_0.7.1
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:34:14PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:36:32PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > (...) For maximum long-term security, I recommend a 3072-bit DSA key
> > (preferably with SHA-512) or a 4096-bit RSA key.
>
> I seriously recommend a RSA key
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:36:32PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:59:16PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> My main gpg public key seams to be a 1024 DSA key (1024D/9D025E87).
>> I would like to have a more robust main key. I've created to 4096 RSA
>> subkey to sign and
Archive Administrator dijo [Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 06:03:24PM +]:
>
> Reject Reasons:
> 'dpkg-source -x' failed for libprawn-ruby_0.7.1+dfsg-1.dsc [return code: 9].
> [dpkg-source output:] dpkg-source: warning: -sn is not a valid option for
> Dpkg::Source::Package::V3::quilt
> [dpkg-source ou
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:59:16PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My main gpg public key seams to be a 1024 DSA key (1024D/9D025E87).
> I would like to have a more robust main key. I've created to 4096 RSA
> subkey to sign and encrypt.
>
> However, is there a way to switch my main key
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:09:27PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> You may find [1] helpful, with the usual disclaimers.
Oops:
1: http://atom.smasher.org/gpg/gpg-migrate.txt
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A5
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 08:59:16PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> ยน: does anyone know if it is possible to extract a subkey from a gpg
> key and add it to another gpg key ?
You may find [1] helpful, with the usual disclaimers.
You cannot transfer signatures from one key to another, they must be
Hi,
My main gpg public key seams to be a 1024 DSA key (1024D/9D025E87).
I would like to have a more robust main key. I've created to 4096 RSA
subkey to sign and encrypt.
However, is there a way to switch my main key ? (ie to create a new
one and change it without loosing all my other keys and s
Good day list,
Is anyone else having a problem with the latest squeeze update of
gnome-panel?
When booting up, the entire desktop shows, icons and everything, and you can
work on it. But the panels take almost 5 minutes to come up... after that
it's fine. Anyone else experiencing this?
Regards
As discussed by a number of people in bug #562757 it appears that
nfs-kernel-server has kicked off a transition to the use of rpcbind - at
least, nfs-kernel-server has switched to needing rpcbind and we can't
have two things claiming the portmap port. Since a number of packages
currently rely on p
I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's
an invitation to create an account.
---
Pritam Bose has invited you to open a free Gmail account.
To accept this invitation and register for your account, vi
> We have had to carry that patch without any upstream support (or sharing
> with Novell, which eventually released SLES 11 with 2.6.27). As a
> result, the xen-flavour kernels for lenny are very buggy, particularly
> for domains with multiple vCPUs (though that *may* be fixed now).
Unfortunately
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to Paul Wise:
>
>>The Adobe CMap resources are now free software and licensed under the
>>BSD license. More information about this can be found here:
>>>http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/log/2009/09/24/adobe-data-freed/
>>http
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:42:53PM +0300, William Pitcock wrote:
> > That was opposed quite strongly by the kernel folks last time it was
> > attempted. Were there any fundamental changes in the Xen dom0 patches
> > since then?
> Only by the kernel folks which believe all of the crap that the KVM
18 matches
Mail list logo
