Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libforest-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Stevan Little
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Forest/
* License : A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com>
* Package name: jxplorer
Version : 3.2rc2
Upstream Author : Chris Betts
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/jxplorer/
* License : Computer Associates Open Source Software License
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmoosex-aliases-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Jesse Luehrs , Chris Prather
,
Justin Hunter
* URL : http://search.cpan
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libcolor-library-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Robert Krimen
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Color-Library/
* Licen
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 646 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 131 (new: 2)
Total number of packages request
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtest-json-perl
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : Curtis "Ovid" Poe
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-JSON/
* License
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 04:33:44PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2009-12-31, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > I know, according to rfc2606, "invalid" seems to be a choice for
> > the top level domain (TLD) to construct domain names that are sure to be
> > invalid from the Internet. But result is the same
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmoosex-storage-perl
Version : 0.23
Upstream Author : Chris Prather
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Storage/
* Lic
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> RFC 5322 doesn't mention "FQDN", "fully" or "qualified" either! Perhaps
> you meant RFC 5321, which uses "FQDN" with a different meaning, and uses
> "primary host name" for what is a FQDN here.
Sorry, yes, that's the one I meant. The mail format standard defines for
i
On 2009-12-31 12:37:25 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
> > On 2009-12-30 11:54:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> Vincent Lefevre writes:
>
> >>> "stanford.edu" is definitely wrong. First it's just a domain name, not a
> >>> FQDN (as required by the mailname(5) man page).
>
On 2009-12-31 16:35:58 +0100, Iustin Pop wrote:
> This is a personal opinion, but having the canonical name rely on
> “hostname --fqdn” is not a favorite of mine: hostname needs the resolver
> to be working and functioning (e.g. it talks to your nameservers if
> /etc/hosts doesn't contain your host
Vincent Lefevre writes:
> On 2009-12-30 11:54:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Vincent Lefevre writes:
>>> "stanford.edu" is definitely wrong. First it's just a domain name, not a
>>> FQDN (as required by the mailname(5) man page).
>> stanford.edu is an RFC 1035 FQDN.
> RFC 1035 (from /usr/sha
Dear debian-team, developers and community,
now as the year 2009 is over, I want to thank you for all the help, the joy
you gave me with debian and the time you spent for a better it-world for us
all.
To all of you I say: May you have great year 2010, stay always sane, may all
your dreams and
On 2009-12-31, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I know, according to rfc2606, "invalid" seems to be a choice for
> the top level domain (TLD) to construct domain names that are sure to be
> invalid from the Internet. But result is the same as choosing "local".
> (This was a choice which I used to use.)
Using
Hi,
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 03:18:51PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > I prefer to allocate such host names in a real domain, and give them just
> > TXT
> > records or 127.0.1.1 A records in some weird cases where I can't trust the
> > box to not do idiotic things like go to the D
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 04:12:30PM +0100, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2009, at 15:04, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > On 2009-12-31 14:10:46 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 02:02:36PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >>> POSIX says:
>
> Have we resolved where the can
> To whom it may concern
>
> I hope you can help us as we really desperate to solve a problem we
> currently facing with a product we imported from China that has a
> problem with the firmware
>
> The product is a 3.5 incn Hard disk media player that you can use to watch
> movies, download music ,
On Dec 31, 2009, at 15:04, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2009-12-31 14:10:46 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 02:02:36PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> POSIX says:
Have we resolved where the canonical hostname is going to reside or does
reside?
Debian's policy manual[0] s
On 2009-12-31 14:10:46 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 02:02:36PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > POSIX says:
> >
> > If the AI_CANONNAME flag is specified and the nodename argument is
> > not null, the function shall attempt to determine the canonical name
> > correspo
On 2009-12-30 15:33:05 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Better correct myself here. POSIX provides a way for apps to query the
> canonical host name, but DOES NOT REQUIRE IT TO BE A FQDN.
>
> So, it provided the notion of a "special name", the canonical host name.
>
> In practice, it
On 2009-12-30 11:54:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre writes:
> > "stanford.edu" is definitely wrong. First it's just a domain name, not a
> > FQDN (as required by the mailname(5) man page).
>
> stanford.edu is an RFC 1035 FQDN.
RFC 1035 (from /usr/share/doc/RFC/links/rfc1035.txt.g
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 02:02:36PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> POSIX says:
>
> If the AI_CANONNAME flag is specified and the nodename argument is
> not null, the function shall attempt to determine the canonical name
> corresponding to nodename (for example, if nodename is an alias or
>
On 2009-12-30 15:31:12 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2009-12-29 17:44:31 +0100, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> > > Mutt in testing/unstable use /etc/mailname.
> >
> > But not the official Mutt version.
>
> Who lets you configure the corre
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2009-12-30, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >> You don't switch to v6-only, you switch to dual stack IPv4+IPv6. One point
> >> being that with a v6-only host you're totally unable to reach IPv4 sites
>
On 2009-12-30, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> You don't switch to v6-only, you switch to dual stack IPv4+IPv6. One point
>> being that with a v6-only host you're totally unable to reach IPv4 sites
>> without the help of application-level proxies.
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 31 décembre 2009, vers 01:16, Sam
Morris disait :
>>> Adding meaningless configuration to work around programs that are
>>> broken by design does not seem like a good solution.
>>
>> There are a lot of programs requiring some kind of FQDN (for example
>
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:51 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote :
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:28:37PM +0100, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Albin Tonnerre
> > * Package name: e17-modules-svn
> > Version : 0.16.999.063
> > Upstream Author : e17 devel
27 matches
Mail list logo
