Re: relocation error: ABI change?

2009-11-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> ... or by application having broken dependency information ... application package I mean -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: relocation error: ABI change?

2009-11-24 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> Hi, > If you see en error message like this one (from [1]): > > qutecom: relocation error: /usr/lib/qutecom/libphapi.so: symbol > CRYPTO_malloc_debug_init, version OPENSSL_0.9.8 not defined in file > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 with link time reference > > does it mean than openssl changed ABI without an

Re: -fPIC, libraries, and overriding a lintian error

2009-11-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Roberto C. Sánchez writes: > In the process of preparing a new oprofile package with a fix for > #537744, I have encountered a peculiar situation. The fix recommended > by the submitter is to link statically against /usr/lib/libbfd.a, rather > than dynaimcally against -lbfd. However, doing that

Re: Tool suggestions for new formats?

2009-11-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Rodrigo Gallardo writes: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:30:40AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:43:42AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: >> > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:28:39 -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote: >> > > Part of my usual workflow with the 1.0 format is to do an interdiff o

relocation error: ABI change?

2009-11-24 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
Hi, If you see en error message like this one (from [1]): qutecom: relocation error: /usr/lib/qutecom/libphapi.so: symbol CRYPTO_malloc_debug_init, version OPENSSL_0.9.8 not defined in file libcrypto.so.0.9.8 with link time reference does it mean than openssl changed ABI without an SO chanage? Or

Bug#557892: RFH: hfsprogs -- mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems

2009-11-24 Thread Rogério Brito
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I would kindly request assistance with maintaining the hfsprogs package, which is a pair of programs for mkfs and fsck for HFS/HFS+ filesystems. The package is developed by Apple, but only a small fraction of the package is actually used. The current packages in Deb

Re: -fPIC, libraries, and overriding a lintian error

2009-11-24 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:43:12PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > Does that mean that I am permitted to override the lintian error? > Please disregard. It turns out that the proposed fix causes a FTBFS on amd64, which is not acceptable. Overriding the lintian error will clearly not help t

-fPIC, libraries, and overriding a lintian error

2009-11-24 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
In the process of preparing a new oprofile package with a fix for #537744, I have encountered a peculiar situation. The fix recommended by the submitter is to link statically against /usr/lib/libbfd.a, rather than dynaimcally against -lbfd. However, doing that results in the following lintian err

Re: DEP3 and even more incompatible "RFC-2822" formats

2009-11-24 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:04:19PM +0100, Carl Fürstenberg a écrit : > I took my time reading DEP3 (http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/) and > notice they introduce an new "RFC-2822-like" format. This time they > introduce an ambiguous rules where either the Description or the > Subject field and cont

Bug#557882: ITP: libextutils-manifest-perl -- utilities to write and check a MANIFEST file

2009-11-24 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Charles Plessy Package name: libextutils-manifest-perl Version : 1.57 Upstream Author : Andreas Koenig andreas.koe...@anima.de URL : http://search.cpan.org/~rkobes/ExtUtils-Manifest-1.57/ License : Perl Programmin

Re: Switch on compiler hardening defaults

2009-11-24 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
["Followup-To:" header set to gmane.linux.debian.devel.general.] On 2009-11-05, Kees Cook wrote: >> The majority of distributions does turn on these options during >> package build time, which IMO is the right thing to do. Debian >> should do the same. There's now Raphael's new framework in place

Re: uscan weirdness

2009-11-24 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Daniel Leidert wrote: > >> Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2009, 18:28 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: >> >>>   Does anyone knows why uscan is not working as I would expect: >>> >>> There is directory: >>> ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x

Re: uscan weirdness

2009-11-24 Thread Raphael Geissert
Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2009, 18:28 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > >> Does anyone knows why uscan is not working as I would expect: >> >> There is directory: >> ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/195.22/ >> >> However latest version detected is 190.42.2

Bug#557835: ITP: jug -- Pure java UUID generator

2009-11-24 Thread Onkar Shinde
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Onkar Shinde * Package name: jug Version : 2.0.0 Upstream Author : Tatu Saloranta * URL : http://jug.safehaus.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 and LGPL 2.1 Programming Lang: Java Description : Pure java UUID generato

Re: uscan weirdness

2009-11-24 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2009, 18:28 +0100 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre: > Does anyone knows why uscan is not working as I would expect: > > There is directory: > ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/195.22/ > > However latest version detected is 190.42.2 > http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/

Re: GDM, getty and VTs

2009-11-24 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue,24.Nov.09, 15:26:33, Jon Dowland wrote: > What I would like to see is something like the following. > I've no idea whether it is achievable technically, but I'd > be interested to know what others thought. > > * the display manager gets the first VT. If there is no > display manager conf

uscan weirdness

2009-11-24 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi there, Does anyone knows why uscan is not working as I would expect: There is directory: ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/195.22/ However latest version detected is 190.42.2 http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/report.php?package=nvidia-graphics-drivers Thanks, -- Mathieu -- To

Re: Tool suggestions for new formats?

2009-11-24 Thread Rodrigo Gallardo
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:30:40AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 03:43:42AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 17:28:39 -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote: > > > Part of my usual workflow with the 1.0 format is to do an interdiff on > > > the .diff.gz from the pr

Re: Lintian based autorejects

2009-11-24 Thread James Vega
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:02:05PM +, Philipp Kern wrote: >>> Everybody should pipe his uploads through lintian.  That's nothing >>> that should be in the upload tool, IMHO.  A unixy

Bug#557808: ITP: gtksheet -- a spreadsheet-like matrix for GTK+

2009-11-24 Thread Luke Faraone
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Luke Faraone * Package name: gtksheet Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Victor M. Hernández-Rocamora * URL : http://vhernandez.github.com/gtksheet/ * License : GPL-2, portions LGPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description

Re: GDM, getty and VTs

2009-11-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
I believe it would be useful to be able to configure preallocated VTs. I know a few people whose first action at boot is starting something like a monitoring application on VT6, dynamic allocation would break this habit. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Re: Lintian based autorejects

2009-11-24 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, Nov 24 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:02:05PM +, Philipp Kern wrote: >> Everybody should pipe his uploads through lintian. That's nothing >> that should be in the upload tool, IMHO. A unixy tool does one job, >> not two. > > Counter example: everybody sh

Re: nexuiz-data does not fit on a single CD

2009-11-24 Thread Jon Dowland
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:38:29AM +, Philip Hands wrote: > That way, not only can the game and first levels be on the > CDs, with the bulk of the levels either being tacked on to > later CDs (or simply left off), but if someone wants to > have a look at the game to see if they like it, they do

Re: GDM, getty and VTs

2009-11-24 Thread Jon Dowland
What I would like to see is something like the following. I've no idea whether it is achievable technically, but I'd be interested to know what others thought. * the display manager gets the first VT. If there is no display manager configured, a TTY is assigned instead. (really, in the absenc

Bug#557788: ITP: libjson-c -- JSON manipulation library

2009-11-24 Thread Fbo
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Fbo * Package name: libjson-c Version : 0.9 Upstream Author : Metaparadigm Pte. Ltd. * URL : http://oss.metaparadigm.com/json-c/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: C Description : JSON manipulation library --

Re: Bits from the FTPMaster meeting

2009-11-24 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:01:06 +0100 Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 22:22:52 +, Neil Williams wrote: > > On Sun, 15, Nov, 2009 at 02:37:56PM -0500, Joey Hess spoke thus.. > > > Note that debootstrap does not support data.tar.bz2. > > ar -p "./$pkg" data.tar.gz | zcat |

Re: New source package formats now available

2009-11-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Raphael Hertzog writes: > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> > Bugs as of today. >> > * Packages with different patch systems like linux-2.6. In this case >> > dpkg-source ignores failures to register a patch and produces >> > sources without the changes. (#557618) >> >> As

Re: Lintian based autorejects

2009-11-24 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:02:05PM +, Philipp Kern wrote: > Everybody should pipe his uploads through lintian. That's nothing > that should be in the upload tool, IMHO. A unixy tool does one job, > not two. Counter example: everybody should pipe his .changes through debchange. Still the chec

Re: Auto Backporting (Was: Backports of scientific packages)

2009-11-24 Thread Francesco Pietra
Hello: As the initial trigger of these interventions, may I ask if anything has been done to provide version 4.0 of GROMACS for amd64 lenny? thanks francesco pietra On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > [Reply-To set to debian-devel because this topic belongs here.] > > On Fri,