Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I either need help with this package to have a DD who can sponsor
uploads on a regular basis or I'll be forced to put link-grammar up
for adoption, becuase lacking a sponsor I haven't gotten a new version
into the archive in ages. (Despite the fact that I've been kee
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:07:12PM +, David Claughton wrote:
[...]
> It is always possible to modify free software in ways that effectively
> make it non-free - for example if you remove all the copyright
> statements from a BSD covered program.
[...]
This is untrue, at least for modern 3-clau
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:28 AM, wrote:
> Total number of orphaned packages: 683 (new: 20)
> Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 147 (new: 0)
> Total number of packages requested help for: 53 (new: 0)
This is kinda depressing, it would be nice to see information on what
was adopte
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 683 (new: 20)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 147 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
Steve Langasek writes:
> I've put together a hand-rolled test package that demonstrates this:
> http://people.debian.org/~vorlon/test-package_1_all.deb
> lintian reports the 'wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid' error for this
> package, but you'll see that unpacking it results in a file
> /usr/share
The next upload of Lintian will remove the check for "Author(s)", since
it's very prone to false positives and isn't checking what it's supposed
to be checking. Thank you very much to Manoj for his work on verifying
this tag.
The copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate tag will
Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:45:36PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>
> 1. https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=udunits
> 2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=545653
> 3. https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=hdf-eos4
> 4. https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=hdf-eos5
H
The Fungi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:28:59PM +, David Claughton wrote:
> [...]
>> You might want to, but AFAICT you would not be able to distribute
>> the result if the user cannot be told how to get the source to the
>> AGPL parts you included. That doesn't mean the original software
> > > >
> > > > Sound good, Mike?
> >
> > Sounds too Firefoxy. Would you mind trying the Camino style for a while?
>
> Well, we've had some reports that Camino style is an improvement.
> Will you wind up using that or Flock style?
The UA
> > Andreas Marschke wrote:
> >> I've recently seen that there are problems with SoundJuicer and open for
> >> adoption maybe.
> >
> > Where did you see that it was up for adoption? It's not listed as
> > Orphaned or RFA'd? In fact it just had an upload on 10/31.
>
> I'd guess that was a misinte
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:28:59PM +, David Claughton wrote:
[...]
> You might want to, but AFAICT you would not be able to distribute
> the result if the user cannot be told how to get the source to the
> AGPL parts you included. That doesn't mean the original software
> isn't DFSG free, at le
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:45:36PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Charles Plessy (12/11/2009):
> Look at e.g. the history of non-buildability for Alastair McKinstry's
> packages. udunits[1,2] comes to mind. (Note I don't think I'm a
> carebear, but that I'm not that used to YELLING in bugreports.
Loïc Minier writes:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> If gcc maintainers agree include a dummy gcc-source-armel package with
>> Depends: gcc-source (= 1.2-3). That way the cross build package will
>> require the right source. It ensures they always enter/leave testing
>> as a
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Andreas Marschke wrote:
>> I've recently seen that there are problems with SoundJuicer and open for
>> adoption maybe.
>
> Where did you see that it was up for adoption? It's not listed as Orphaned or
> RFA'd? In fact it just had an upload
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Stupid question: with this wording of the AGPL, who, in his right mind,
>> will be licensing a DNS or POP server under this license ? (Except maybe
>> someone who didn't read it)
>
> There are lots of people who pick
Andreas Marschke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently seen that there are problems with SoundJuicer and open for
> adoption maybe. I think its a usefull tool for a fast rip of a cd.
> I would like to know if there is a way to adopt the package if necessary and
> if you can point me to a wiki page th
Hi,
I've recently seen that there are problems with SoundJuicer and open for
adoption maybe. I think its a usefull tool for a fast rip of a cd.
I would like to know if there is a way to adopt the package if necessary and
if you can point me to a wiki page that has a correct way to adopt a pack
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:42:17AM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> * Package name: fast-md5
MD5 is broken. Why do you start with a package that supports exactly
this one hash?
> * URL : http://www.twmacinta.com/myjava/fast_md5.php
The supplied tarball includes binaries, are you hand
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Onkar Shinde
* Package name: fast-md5
Version : 2.6.2
Upstream Author : Timothy W Macinta
* URL : http://www.twmacinta.com/myjava/fast_md5.php
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : fast implement
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: r-bioc-hilbertvis
Version : 1.5.0
* URL : http://www.bioconductor.org
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C, R
Description : GNU R package to visualise long vector data
This tool a
Dominique Dumont a écrit on 12/11/2009 15:02:
> On Wednesday 11 November 2009 20:16:08 Rodolphe Quiedeville wrote:
>> I would like to use a perl lib included in postgresql-common from a
>> postinst script. What have I to do ?
>
> I assume you want to call this perl lib from a postinst outside of
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:51:41PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 09:58 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I actually never experienced problems that were not due to my DSL
> > connection, which means they can happen at any time. In which case I'd
> > dcut the last file and
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 09:58 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I actually never experienced problems that were not due to my DSL
> connection, which means they can happen at any time. In which case I'd
> dcut the last file and continue the upload. But when that happens in the
> middle of a file that takes
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 11.11.2009 at 23:46:59 +0100, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> Yes, this is one of the awkward things I find in the AGPL. If it's not
>> a webapp, what then?
>
> please see this:
>
> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> your app uses both libfoo and libbar. libbar uses libfoo. with ld, it
> is sufficient to do -lbar, and with gold you need -lfoo -lbar.
> in both cases, your app will have NEEDED entries for both libfoo and
> libbar.
If your app is using both libfoo and
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If gcc maintainers agree include a dummy gcc-source-armel package with
> Depends: gcc-source (= 1.2-3). That way the cross build package will
> require the right source. It ensures they always enter/leave testing
> as a pair.
I think that would
Hi
(We also had separate discussions Hector, Matthias and I, sometimes
including debian-embedded@ and/or Neil Williams -- I'm catching up on
the debian-devel@ thread.)
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009, Hector Oron wrote:
> I would like to do a little explanation on the ITP I have filled for
> {l
Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 14:18:51, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> Am Mittwoch, den 11.11.2009, 22:57 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > Daniel Leidert, le Wed 11 Nov 2009 17:36:05 +0100, a écrit :
> > > A question: I'm currently working with relaxNG and found, that we
> > > (Debian) AFAIK don't have t
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 20:16:08 Rodolphe Quiedeville wrote:
> I would like to use a perl lib included in postgresql-common from a
> postinst script. What have I to do ?
I assume you want to call this perl lib from a postinst outside of postgresql-
common package.
> Call directly from the
Am Mittwoch, den 11.11.2009, 22:57 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Daniel Leidert, le Wed 11 Nov 2009 17:36:05 +0100, a écrit :
> > A question: I'm currently working with relaxNG and found, that we
> > (Debian) AFAIK don't have the schemes for RNG [1] or XSD [2] packaged.
>
> I don't know very mu
Hi,
On Wed, 11.11.2009 at 23:46:59 +0100, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> Yes, this is one of the awkward things I find in the AGPL. If it's not
> a webapp, what then?
please see this:
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AGPLv3InteractingRemotely
It could eg. also be network file sys
Hi,
On Thu, 12.11.2009 at 12:51:56 +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:07:24PM -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:41:31PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > >-- The code is modified to interact with the user using a network
> > > > protocol
> > > >
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:07:24PM -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:41:31PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > >-- The code is modified to interact with the user using a network
> > > protocol
> > > that does not allow to display a prominent offer.
> >
> > Any exampl
Charles Plessy (12/11/2009):
> I am not the one who calls people sloppy, stupid or candid on this
> list.
You started talking about people being non sloppy, that was not my
language. (Or maybe I didn't dig enough to find another mention of it
earlier in the thread, my bad should that be the case.
Le Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 02:18:16AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>
> Nice to see you assert your gut feeling is right and that stupid
> people are candid enough to believe in myths.
>
> When you change your mind and actually start caring, try and check
> what you're talking about, try and dig
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Stupid question: with this wording of the AGPL, who, in his right mind,
> will be licensing a DNS or POP server under this license ? (Except maybe
> someone who didn't read it)
There are lots of people who pick a license without close reading.
Frank Lin PIAT a écrit :
> Russell Coker wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>>> First, network protocols that "do not allow to display" anything are
>>> abundant, since no network protocol "displays" anything -- clients that
>>> use the protocol do. This is true for HTTP, FTP, S
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 10, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
>> Due to changes in udev 147, squeeze will not support kernels earlier
>> than 2.6.27.
> I uploaded a 147-2 package which reverts the O_CLOEXEC change and allows
> 2.6.26, let's see if it works.
Big thanks for working on this issue. I hope i
Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> First, network protocols that "do not allow to display" anything are
>> abundant, since no network protocol "displays" anything -- clients that
>> use the protocol do. This is true for HTTP, FTP, SMTP, and whatnot.
>
> If you co
39 matches
Mail list logo
