Dear all,
recently I found out that the only arch where texworks is not build
is amd64 (the -2 debian release of texworks).
Looking into the buildd I see that *several* packages are hanging there
in the queue since up to 8(!) days.
Is that a problem on the buildd, can someone restart the queue t
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Can you please consider changing the above naming?
FWIW the actual reject messages are very clear and do not use these
terms (which I've changed in Git anyway, pending merge). Thanks.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian
check our website www.fakeutilitys.com
> | === modified file 'policy.sgml'
> | --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 +
> | +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 00:59:18 +
> | @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@
> |
> | It must start with the line #!/usr/bin/make -f,
[Tollef Fog Heen]
> This should probably also be changed to allow «
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 06:46:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Samstag, 31. Oktober 2009, sean finney wrote:
> > if it's regenerable, then i'd say /var/cache/munin/something is the
> > right place, and if isn't /var/lib/munin/something. if you seperate
> > the things that the user might want
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremy Lal
* Package name: node.js
Version : 0.1.15
Upstream Author : Ryan Dahl
* URL : http://nodejs.org
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C++, Javascript
Description : Event-based I/O for V8 javascript
Node
Bernd Eckenfels writes:
> you wrote:
>> getting around to filing bugs on policy MUST violations and others that
>> make the package too buggy to be in Debian
> I think packages which had no bug reports before are clearly not too
> buggy to be in Debian.
No bug reports could just be a sign that
In article <87hbtfxwyz@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> you wrote:
> getting around to filing bugs on policy MUST violations and others that
> make the package too buggy to be in Debian
I think packages which had no bug reports before are clearly not too buggy
to be in Debian.
Gruss
Bernd
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lukasz Janyst
* Package name: kwin-style-aurorae
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Martin Graesslin
* URL :
http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php/Aurorae+Theme+Engine?content=107158
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
On Sat, Oct 31 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mittwoch, 30. September 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'm still unconvinced by /srv personally - we've strived for years in
>> Debian to make things work as much as possible straight from initial
>> installation, yet now we're expected to del
On Sat, Oct 31 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Some examples of tags where I do not consider this reasonable until bugs
>> have been filed:
>> - statically-linked-binary
>> - mknod-in-maintainer-script
>> - debian-rules-not-a-makefile
>> - dir-or-file-in-var-www
>
> Again, +1.
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 06:46:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Samstag, 31. Oktober 2009, sean finney wrote:
> > if it's regenerable, then i'd say /var/cache/munin/something is the
> > right place, and if isn't /var/lib/munin/something. if you seperate
> > the things that the user might want
Hi,
On Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2009, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 at 15:06:07 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > The second category is named "error" and the tags listed can not be
> > overridden.
>
> I don't think it's appropriate to make, for instance,
> dir-or-file-in-var-www instantl
Hi sean,
On Samstag, 31. Oktober 2009, sean finney wrote:
> if it's regenerable, then i'd say /var/cache/munin/something is the
> right place, and if isn't /var/lib/munin/something. if you seperate
> the things that the user might want to configure (css, etc), where's
> the problem[1]?
that it's
hi holger,
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 05:51:26PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> +1 from yet. Yet I still don't know how to configure munin, so that it works
> out of the box (and so that the webpages it generates are served by a
> webserver) and conforms to FHS like some people read it.
>
> /var/li
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 30. September 2009, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm still unconvinced by /srv personally - we've strived for years in
> Debian to make things work as much as possible straight from initial
> installation, yet now we're expected to deliberately leave services
> unconfigured. I don't th
Hello,
I'm running "Debian sid" on "x86_64" and tried to build a "google-earth"
package today, which failed with
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for
/emul/ia32-linux/lib/libm.so.6 (used by ../usr/lib/googleearth/liblayer.so).
After some investigation into bi-arch a
]] Ben Finney
| === modified file 'policy.sgml'
| --- policy.sgml 2009-10-21 20:49:37 +
| +++ policy.sgml 2009-10-31 00:59:18 +
| @@ -1725,7 +1725,10 @@
|
| It must start with the line #!/usr/bin/make -f,
This should probably also be changed to allow «#! /usr/bin/make
18 matches
Mail list logo
