hi Andi:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
since our recent release update, things have been moving a bit. We'd
like to give you the basic status of all our architectures for
Squeeze, for details please see the individual mails (and "basic
status" doesn't cover all details of cours
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 11:51 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > That package is currently called firmware-linux but will be renamed
> > shortly because we now also package the DFSG-free firmware from the
> > Linux tree as firmware-linux-free. (firmware-linux
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> That package is currently called firmware-linux but will be renamed
> shortly because we now also package the DFSG-free firmware from the
> Linux tree as firmware-linux-free. (firmware-linux will then become a
> metapackage.)
Thanks a lot for this advic
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 12:13:45PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:19:10PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Also, I haven't looked into either one in enough detail, but how does
> your approach differ from ucf?
ucf has a rather crude upgrade strategy: either accept ups
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luca Bruno
* Package name: anjuta-extras
Version : 2.28.0
Upstream Author : Naba kumar
* URL : http://projects.gnome.org/anjuta
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C, C++, Python
Description : plugins and extras
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:01 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Martin Ågren wrote:
> > I believe one of us misread Russell. :) I thought he meant "While I
> > understand that you'll be crapped on if a kernel upload eats data, I
> > think it would be ok to ...". As I read it, he's no
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 04:41:43PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 13 2009, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > > Both libreadline-dev (>= 6.0) and libreadline6-dev are now available
> > > in unstable and testing. If possible,
* brian m. carlson:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:13:59PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Except the issue is not about dual licensing, but about intent being
>> different to what the license actually says. i.e. The GPL3 the code is
>> supposed to be released under doesn't have these obligations, and
On Oct 07, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> may be a fail of the dissident test, as there is the word "must".
Which would not make it non-free either, as it is not part of the DFSG.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:19:10PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > Also, I haven't looked into either one in enough detail, but how does
> > your approach differ from ucf?
> ucf has a rather crude upgrade strategy: either accept upstream or keep your
> file or use your favorite editor.
That's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Goirand skrev:
> Please do not start a 100 post thread in this ITP if this has been
> discussed in the past (let's not loose time twice on a bad license). I
> just would like to have a link here to the archive of the old discussion
> about if on
Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> As I mentioned on the intel-gfx list. For KMS on Intel you'll need to
> boot with video=i915:modeset=1
>
> Also, make sure you're using 0.93.4 or later of initramfs-tools.
>
> Having this more widely documented would probably be a good idea, as
> upstream have just ripped
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:10:27PM +, The Fungi wrote:
[...]
> ...so I guess just adding i915.modeset=1 to the kernel command line
> should make it go.
[...]
Just to follow up, Sven Arvidsson confirmed over on intel-...@lfdo
that video=i915:modeset=1 on the kernel command line coupled with
ini
brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:13:59PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Except the issue is not about dual licensing, but about intent being
>> different to what the license actually says. i.e. The GPL3 the code is
>> supposed to be released under doesn't have these obligations, a
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 15:10 +, The Fungi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:40:09PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521596#10
> >
> > I don't remember how to enable it, though.
>
> I do see this this in the changelog for 2.6.29-1:
>
> * [x86] u
On Wed, Oct 07 2009, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Manoj Srivastava]
>>> Is CONCURRENCY set in /etc/init.d/rc ? I used to have it set there.
>>
>> /etc/init.d/rc:CONCURRENCY=none
>
> Could it be a bootchart problem instead, graphing the wrong file or
> something? The version in unstable was bro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Oswald
* Package name: libapp-daemon-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Mike Schilli
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~mschilli/App-Daemon-0.06/
* License : Artistic, GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Description
Hello Eric
Le mercredi 7 octobre 2009 13:09:06, vous avez écrit :
> I don't really want to add a dependency on another package for such a
> simple task.
Simple, but it may be repetitive. Here a real life comment made by one of your
users on #debian-perl:
(03:02:23 PM) dusty: ddumont1: thanks f
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:40:09PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521596#10
>
> I don't remember how to enable it, though.
I do see this this in the changelog for 2.6.29-1:
* [x86] unset DRM_I915_KMS due to upgrade path from Lenny override
with modes
Your email program does not support HTML. To view an online version of this
email, please click the link below.
http://eb11.emailsparkle.com/rwcode/content.asp?SID=1&SiteID=95923&Section=579127&EmailID=33626872&HitID=1254925239000
To unsubscribe, click the link below.
http://eb11.emailsparkle.c
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 04:13:59PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Except the issue is not about dual licensing, but about intent being
> different to what the license actually says. i.e. The GPL3 the code is
> supposed to be released under doesn't have these obligations, and
> anybody not contributing
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 02:24:36PM +, The Fungi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:01:13AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> [...]
> > But it has been pointed out a few times (including a couple of
> > private messages) that experimental has what I desire (thanks for
> > the advice everyone).
> [.
Marcus Better wrote:
> This is non-free. Please keep it out of Debian.
>
> Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing.
> There is no need to repeat that story here, let me just point to this page:
> http://www.extjs.com/company/dual.php
>
> Here they make claims that d
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Alexey Salmin wrote:
>> I think it's reasonable for package maintainers to check compatibility
>> with the kernel from the
>> distribution they upload package to. Especialy here when package is
>> newer then kernel driver.
>> It's of course harder to supervise the situation w
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:01:13AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
[...]
> But it has been pointed out a few times (including a couple of
> private messages) that experimental has what I desire (thanks for
> the advice everyone).
[...]
Now if only it had CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS and CONFIG_HID_WACOM enable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Goirand skrev:
>> Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing.
> Hell, I missed it.
Oh well :-)
> This doesn't appear at all on the license.txt. Do you
> think I could still package it for the non-free archive?
I don
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:58:45PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Oct 2009, Marcus Better wrote:
> > This is non-free. Please keep it out of Debian.
> >
> > Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing.
> >
> > There is no need to repeat that story here, let me
On Wed, 07 Oct 2009, Marcus Better wrote:
> This is non-free. Please keep it out of Debian.
>
> Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing.
>
> There is no need to repeat that story here, let me just point to this page:
> http://www.extjs.com/company/dual.php
>
> Here
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name: python-nipype
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : NIPY Developers
* URL : http://nipy.sourceforge.net/nipype/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Analysis pipelin
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Martin Ågren wrote:
> I believe one of us misread Russell. :) I thought he meant "While I
> understand that you'll be crapped on if a kernel upload eats data, I
> think it would be ok to ...". As I read it, he's not expecting them to
> do anything *more* than they already do, j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is non-free. Please keep it out of Debian.
Surely you are aware of the huge controversy around Ext JS licensing.
There is no need to repeat that story here, let me just point to this page:
http://www.extjs.com/company/dual.php
Here they make c
Dear Webmaster,
I am a SEO optimizer. As a part of ongoing promotion of my clients I want
to exchange links with you. Please add me in your contact list for further
communication.
arind...@indusnet.co.in
I have many sites related to different themes to exchange links like Health,
Auto, Finance
Upcoming birthdays
Hello Hacked By hacker Save ur ac,
Only 5 more days until http://www.unyk.com/Default.asp?LastPage=%2FMyContacts%2FAddressBookDetails.asp%3FMemberID%3D9E96A8A779758BA6&cmpid=en-US-0009&Redirect=1&DisplayFirst=506&Change=1&Lang=2&cid=9E96A6AA7E7A859F&mid=9E96A8A779758BA6&cemai
2009/10/7 Josselin Mouette :
> Le mercredi 07 octobre 2009 à 14:12 +1100, Russell Coker a écrit :
>> I expect that the kernel team tends to be more careful about uploads to
>> Unstable than most package maintainers due to the scope of damage that a bad
>> kernel can cause.
>
> I think it is unreaso
I think it's reasonable for package maintainers to check compatibility
with the kernel from the
distribution they upload package to. Especialy here when package is
newer then kernel driver.
It's of course harder to supervise the situation when kernel pass
ahead of user-space packages
but it's also
[Manoj Srivastava]
>> Is CONCURRENCY set in /etc/init.d/rc ? I used to have it set there.
>
> /etc/init.d/rc:CONCURRENCY=none
Could it be a bootchart problem instead, graphing the wrong file or
something? The version in unstable was broken because some Java
library changed its API. I uploaded
Le mercredi 07 octobre 2009 à 14:12 +1100, Russell Coker a écrit :
> I expect that the kernel team tends to be more careful about uploads to
> Unstable than most package maintainers due to the scope of damage that a bad
> kernel can cause.
I think it is unreasonable to ask them to check interac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: libjs-extjs
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Author : Ext JS LLC
* URL : http://www.extjs.com/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Javascript, PHP
Description : a cross-browser JavaScript l
Le mardi 6 octobre 2009 17:09:05, Dominique Dumont a écrit :
> The patch for approx is much simpler (See attachment):
Ahem, here's the patch in attachment. Sorry.
All the best
diff -Naur approx-4.0/debian/approx.postinst approx-dev/debian/approx.postinst
--- approx-4.0/debian/approx.postinst 2009
39 matches
Mail list logo
