The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 442 (new: 8)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 133 (new: 3)
Total number of packages request
forcemerge 542647 527040
thanks
Hello Aron,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:18:41AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> Subject: gmchess
> Package: gmchess
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I would like to pack gmchess for debian.
There is already an ITP (Intent to Package) about gmchess, tracked by
#527040.
You may co
Joss wrote:
>Le mercredi 19 août 2009 à 08:55 -0300, Rogério Brito a écrit :
>> |
>> | Please, if an existing package has not been updated for some time, just
>> | publicize this fact more conspicuously. Let us engage the existing (and
>> | prospective) maintainers in taking care of aging, bu
Package: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.1
Severity: wishlist
Excerpts from gregor herrmann's message of Thu Aug 20 11:53:56 -0700 2009:
> Wow, cool, thanks a lot!
No problem.
> Can you image to take a look at the Developers' Reference too? AFAIK
> the only mentioning of teams there is in 5.12
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:15:00 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > The interesting question is how to encourage people to join teams;
> > some thoughts from DebConf can be found here:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2009/07/msg00083.html
> > (especially point 3)
> One thought captured in those notes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ondřej Surý"
* Package name: opendnssec
Version : 1.0a2
Upstream Author : Roy Arends, Rickard Bondesson, Alex Dalitz, John A.
Dickinson, Jelte Jansen, Sion Lloyd, Matthijs Mekking, Stephen Morris, Jakob
Schlyter, Patrik Wallström
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ondřej Surý"
* Package name: libnet-dns-sec-maint-zone
Version : 0.012
Upstream Author : Olaf M. Kolkman
* URL : http://www.ripe.net/disi/dnssec_maint_tool/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : D
In <20090820133354.gb2...@ime.usp.br>, Rogério Brito wrote:
>The reason why I posted to both is that I see a trend in -mentors that
>many new contributors seem to create an artificial need as a reason to
>get their contributions in the distribution and choose to package a new
>program.
Instead you
Subject: gmchess
Package: gmchess
Severity: wishlist
I would like to pack gmchess for debian. gmchess is available under GPLv2.
gmChess can let you play Chinese chess (Xiangqi) with human or
computer, read many chess manual and improve your skill.
It can be downloaded at http://code.google.com/p/g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Andres Klode
* Package name: python-fstab
Version : 1.4
Upstream Author : Lars Wirzenius
* URL : https://launchpad.net/python-fstab
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : read, manipulate
Excerpts from gregor herrmann's message of Thu Aug 20 02:25:09 -0700 2009:
> There's a central place for teams in Debian:
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams
That's an excellent resource, yes.
> The interesting question is how to encourage people to join teams;
> some thoughts from DebConf can be fou
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Andres Klode
* Package name: computer-janitor
Version : 1.12.1
Upstream Author : Lars Wirzenius
* URL : http://launchpad.net/computer-janitor
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : clean
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christine Spang
* Package name: libtest-http-server-simple-stashwarnings-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Shawn Moore
* URL :
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-HTTP-Server-Simple-StashWarnings
* License : Perl (Arti
Hi, Gregor and everybody else.
On Aug 20 2009, gregor herrmann wrote:
> [Any reason why this thread happens on both -devel and -mentors?]
I am not subscribed to -devel (only to -mentors; I asked to be CC'ed on
the original message).
The reason why I posted to both is that I see a trend in -mento
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le jeudi 20 août 2009 à 19:07 +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
> > Perhaps a good way to point it out on an ongoing basis would be a
> > central clearing house for “specific teams that a newcomer should
> > consider joining”. Is there such a list (and where is it maintained
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com (20/08/2009):
> I am lost, why is the versionned boost1.39 back then ? How should
> one write control file using let say: libboost-math-dev ? Should I
> do libboost-math-dev | libboost-math1.39-dev ?
The -defaults package provides versionless -dev packages who pull
Steve,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the upload of boost-defaults, a new package
that supplies unversioned -dev packages for Boost (libboost-dev, etc.)
that simply depend on the current "default" Boost version (today, it
is Boost 1.38.0)
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:07:42 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
[Any reason why this thread happens on both -devel and -mentors?]
> Josselin Mouette writes:
> > It is never pointed out enough that the core packaging teams are
> > seriously understaffed. Please, before uploading your pet package to
> > the
Le jeudi 20 août 2009 à 19:07 +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
> Perhaps a good way to point it out on an ongoing basis would be a
> central clearing house for “specific teams that a newcomer should
> consider joining”. Is there such a list (and where is it maintained)?
> Would such a list even make se
Josselin Mouette writes:
> It is never pointed out enough that the core packaging teams are
> seriously understaffed. Please, before uploading your pet package to
> the archive, consider joining one of the packaging teams looking for
> more maintainers: eglibc, Mozilla, KDE, GNOME, Xfce, Utopia,
n Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:03:18 +, Leinier Cruz Salfran
wrote:
> I see this post and I would ask the team that keep the old version of
> theses packages in order to allow me to use my old integrated video card
> 'ati radeon xpress 200'
This card works without any problem with radeon driver. B
Josselin Mouette wrote:
It is never pointed out enough that the core packaging teams are
seriously understaffed. Please, before uploading your pet package to the
archive, consider joining one of the packaging teams looking for more
maintainers: eglibc, Mozilla, KDE, GNOME, Xfce, Utopia, Apache, K
Josselin Mouette writes:
> It is never pointed out enough that the core packaging teams are
> seriously understaffed. Please, before uploading your pet package to
> the archive, consider joining one of the packaging teams looking for
> more maintainers: eglibc, Mozilla, KDE, GNOME, Xfce, Utopia,
On 2009-08-19, Andreas Moog wrote:
> Another way to fix this is to have the scripts use /bin/bash as shell
> (as Daniel Leidert suggested, this is a problem with dash as /bin/sh).
I guess I need to point out that dash as default will propagate to the
buildds when chroots are redone. (Which does
Le mercredi 19 août 2009 à 08:55 -0300, Rogério Brito a écrit :
> | It is with sadness that I see many NEW packages uploaded to the Debian
> | repository and little thought about some packages that are already in
> | the distribution, but that are bit-rotting.
> |
> | Please, if an existing packa
Le mercredi 19 août 2009 à 21:50 +0200, Pierre Chifflier a écrit :
> * License : GPLv3
> sidenote: while the project has a COPYING file containing the GPLv3
> text, almost all source files have a BSD-license header, and none of
> them have the GPL header ?!
IIRC this can be caused by aut
Hi all,
As you all know and hate, the various source control management systems
that are set up on Alioth were mostly managed by hand. The reason was
that FusionForge (and SourceForge and GForge before that) didn't have any
integration for anything but CVS and Subversion.
This recently changed
27 matches
Mail list logo
