almodhena desea chatear

--- almodhena desea mantener el contacto contigo a través de algunos de los mejores productos que Google ha lanzado recientemente. Si ya utilizas Gmail o Google Talk, visita: http://mail.google.com/mail/b-17b6dd4730-cfa92b467a-76

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

Peter Samuelson writes: > [Emilio Pozuelo Monfort] >> We haven't agreed on whether there should be one ddeb per source or >> per binary package, so I would leave this still opened. > Maybe I'm losing track of things here, but it seems to me that everyone > except you is saying one ddeb per binar

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort] > We haven't agreed on whether there should be one ddeb per source or > per binary package, so I would leave this still opened. Maybe I'm losing track of things here, but it seems to me that everyone except you is saying one ddeb per binary. And then you say "sure, we co

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

On Fri, Aug 14 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > Er, the point is that you've plucked this "apt-get debug" out of the > *Ubuntu* spec, ; that spec > is considered implemented, Ubuntu doesn't have such a debug command, > and Emilio's proposal at >

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

]] Emilio Pozuelo Monfort | > Because you're trying to debug a binary on your system that's linked | > against it. | | Then you should work on making your package build with the new library, since it | will be FTBFS anyway :) No, it won't. You're confusing changed ABI from changed API. Say y

Re: Is Emanuele Gentili MIA?

Hello Devid, On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 22:48, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > Hi, > Emanuele Gentili (emg...@ubuntu.com) is the Debian maintainer of > rapache package which is affected by an RC bug since a year. The RC > bug can be fixed in Debian (it is a package issue) but there are also > new rapac

seohubs has invited you to join Internet Marketing Strategy

seohubs has invited you to join the group: Internet Marketing Strategy. BlogCatalog.com is the fastest-growing social network for bloggers on the Internet. This is a community where bloggers connect, share ideas, and make things happen. To join BlogCatalog, follow the link below: http://www.blog

Is Emanuele Gentili MIA?

Hi, Emanuele Gentili (emg...@ubuntu.com) is the Debian maintainer of rapache package which is affected by an RC bug since a year. The RC bug can be fixed in Debian (it is a package issue) but there are also new rapache upstream releases that IMHO should be uploaded. Is he MIA? Thanks, Devid --

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:55:38PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> > Yes, dpkg, apt-get, aptitude and synaptic all work perfectly fine. > >> The debug command addresses my concerns here. > > You know this command doesn't actually exist, right? AFAIK it's only > > referenced in an Ubu

Re: default character encoding for everything in debian

Hi, (I want to see as much UTF-8 support. These days, it is not bad. Try using "sed" with UTF-8. It works! Of course with some understandable gliches.) On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 08:55:27PM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote: > On Mo, 10 Aug 2009, Roger Leigh wrote: > > Of course there's a penalty f

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

On Fri, Aug 14 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:42:55AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> > Yes, dpkg, apt-get, aptitude and synaptic all work perfectly fine. > >> The debug command addresses my concerns here.

Re: Situation of long threads in -devel

Josselin Mouette writes: > Le vendredi 14 août 2009 à 01:16 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : >> Joss going from "what's the point in Standards-Version?" to filing a >> Lintian bug asking for configuration capabilities to make it easier to >> ignore the tag in the course of what felt like less than a

Re: MBF for removal of python-gnome2-desktop binary package

Josselin Mouette wrote: > due to some upcoming changes in the list of supported modules upstream, > the python-gnome2-desktop binary package will be removed soon. Packages > must depend on the individual modules instead. ... > Kartik Mistry >ldtp > > Ara Pulido >ldtp (U) Fixed as #5414

Re: Automatic Debug Packages

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:42:55AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13 2009, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Yes, dpkg, apt-get, aptitude and synaptic all work perfectly fine. > The debug command addresses my concerns here. You know this command doesn't actually exist, righ

Re: Situation of long threads in -devel

Le vendredi 14 août 2009 à 01:16 -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > Joss going from "what's the point in Standards-Version?" to filing a > Lintian bug asking for configuration capabilities to make it easier to > ignore the tag in the course of what felt like less than a day (this is > subjective -- I

Re: Situation of long threads in -devel (was: Re: An apology to the mailing list and Charles Plessey)

On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: > Actually, these threads would indeed benefit a lot from a general > summary by the thread initiator. My current short view of them: > > - situation of new source packages format: I haven't followed that > one very much. It seems extinct as of now.

Re: Situation of long threads in -devel

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Russ Allbery wrote: > Christian Perrier writes: > >> I think that, in the very long threads that are currently cluttering up >> -devel, we would benefit from most participants to cool down and >> consider moving from the extreme positions I've seen when overreading

Re: Non-unified patches and dpkg source format ‘3.0 (quilt)’.

On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > - create directories that do not exist yet (patch will not do that for > > you AFAIK or at least that's the assumption that the current codebase > > made, it might have changed since this part of the code has been written) > > According to the ma

Re: Situation of long threads in -devel

Thank you for this message, Christian. It was really appreciated here. Christian Perrier writes: > I think that, in the very long threads that are currently cluttering up > -devel, we would benefit from most participants to cool down and > consider moving from the extreme positions I've seen wh

add me link exchang

hi add me link ex. thanks, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Situation of long threads in -devel (was: Re: An apology to the mailing list and Charles Plessey)

I take this message from Manoj as an opportunity: > Hi, > > Inadvertently, a draft copy of an email written in anger, and > not meant to be actually sent, was sent to the mailing list, instead > of a more reasoned response. > > For that I apologize. You may see from the second